| [1] | Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM (1997) The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci 17: 4302–4311.
|
| [2] | Barton JJ, Press DZ, Keenan JP, O'Connor M (2002) Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology 58: 71–78.
|
| [3] | Harris A, Aguirre GK (2008) The representation of parts and wholes in face-selective cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 863–878.
|
| [4] | Harris A, Aguirre GK (2010) Neural tuning for face wholes and parts in human fusiform gyrus revealed by FMRI adaptation. J Neurophysiol 104: 336–345.
|
| [5] | Liu J, Harris A, Kanwisher N (2010) Perception of face parts and face configurations: an FMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 22: 203–211.
|
| [6] | Maurer D, Ocraven K, Legrand R, Mondloch C, Springer M, et al. (2007) Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing. Neuropsychologia 45: 1438–1451.
|
| [7] | Rhodes G, Michie PT, Hughes ME, Byatt G (2009) The fusiform face area and occipital face area show sensitivity to spatial relations in faces. European Journal of Neuroscience 30: 721–733.
|
| [8] | Rotshtein P, Geng JJ, Driver J, Dolan RJ (2007) Role of features and second-order spatial relations in face discrimination, face recognition, and individual face skills: behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging data. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 1435–1452.
|
| [9] | Yovel G, Kanwisher N (2004) Face PerceptionDomain Specific, Not Process Specific. Neuron 44: 889–898.
|
| [10] | Maurer D, Grand RL, Mondloch CJ (2002) The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci 6: 255–260.
|
| [11] | McKone E, Martini P, Nakayama K (2001) Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27: 573–599.
|
| [12] | Sergent J (1984) An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology 75: 221–242.
|
| [13] | Tanaka JW, Farah MJ (1993) Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A 46: 225–245.
|
| [14] | Young AW, Hellawell D, Hay DC (1987) Configurational information in face perception. Perception 16: 747–759.
|
| [15] | Schiltz C (2010) Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion. Journal of Vision 10: 1–16.
|
| [16] | Schiltz C, Rossion B (2006) Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. NeuroImage 32: 1385–1394.
|
| [17] | Cabeza R, Kato T (2000) Features are also important: contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychol Sci 11: 429–433.
|
| [18] | Diamond R, Carey S (1986) Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J Exp Psychol Gen 115: 107–117.
|
| [19] | Rhodes G (1988) Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception 17: 43–63.
|
| [20] | Barton JJ, Keenan JP, Bass T (2001) Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. Br J Psychol 92 Part 3: 527–549.
|
| [21] | Freire A, Lee K, Symons LA (2000) The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence. Perception 29: 159–170.
|
| [22] | Leder H, Bruce V (2000) When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A 53: 513–536.
|
| [23] | Riesenhuber M, Jarudi I, Gilad S, Sinha P (2004) Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271: S448–S450.
|
| [24] | Yovel G, Kanwisher N (2008) The representations of spacing and part-based information are associated for upright faces but dissociated for objects: evidence from individual differences. Psychon Bull Rev 15: 933–939.
|
| [25] | Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, Brent HP (2004) Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychol Sci 15: 762–768.
|
| [26] | Zhu Q, Li X, Chow K, Liu J (2009) The part task of the part-spacing paradigm is not a pure measurement of part-based information of faces. PLoS One 4: e6239.
|
| [27] | Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain M, Tanaka JN (1998) What is “special” about face perception? Psychol Rev 105: 482–498.
|
| [28] | Tanaka JW, Sengco JA (1997) Features and their configuration in face recognition. Mem Cognit 25: 583–592.
|
| [29] | Cox DD, Savoy RL (2003) Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex. NeuroImage 19: 261–270.
|
| [30] | Haxby JV, Gobbini MI, Furey ML, Ishai A, Schouten JL, et al. (2001) Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 293: 2425–2430.
|
| [31] | Haynes JD, Rees G (2006) Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 523–534.
|
| [32] | Norman KA, Polyn SM, Detre GJ, Haxby JV (2006) Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 424–430.
|
| [33] | Peelen MV, Downing PE (2007) Using multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data to interpret overlapping functional activations. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 4–5.
|
| [34] | Schurger A, Pereira F, Treisman A, Cohen JD (2010) Reproducibility distinguishes conscious from nonconscious neural representations. Science 327: 97–99.
|
| [35] | Xue G, Dong Q, Chen C, Lu Z, Mumford JA, et al. (2010) Greater neural pattern similarity across repetitions is associated with better memory. Science 330: 97–101.
|
| [36] | Li S, Mayhew SD, Kourtzi Z (2009) Learning Shapes the Representation of Behavioral Choice in the Human Brain. Neuron 62: 441–452.
|
| [37] | Raizada RDS, Tsao FM, Liu HM, Kuhl PK (2009) Quantifying the Adequacy of Neural Representations for a Cross-Language Phonetic Discrimination Task: Prediction of Individual Differences. Cerebral Cortex 20: 1–12.
|
| [38] | Williams MA, Dang S, Kanwisher NG (2007) Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance. Nature Neuroscience 10: 685–686.
|
| [39] | Hosie JA, Ellis HD, Haig ND (1988) The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces. Perception 17: 461–474.
|
| [40] | Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson AP (1993) What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition 47: 25–57.
|
| [41] | Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage 9: 179–194.
|
| [42] | Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage 9: 195–207.
|
| [43] | Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Moylan J, Skudlarski P, Gore JC, et al. (2000) The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J Cogn Neurosci 12: 495–504.
|
| [44] | Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Hendler T, Malach R (2000) The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nat Neurosci 3: 837–843.
|
| [45] | Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N (2001) Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293: 1506–1509.
|
| [46] | Rossion B, Dricot L, Devolder A, Bodart JM, Crommelinck M, et al. (2000) Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci 12: 793–802.
|
| [47] | Grill-Spector K, Knouf N, Kanwisher N (2004) The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nature Neuroscience 7: 555–562.
|
| [48] | Hirabayashi T, Miyashita Y (2005) Dynamically modulated spike correlation in monkey inferior temporal cortex depending on the feature configuration within a whole object. J Neurosci 25: 10299–10307.
|
| [49] | Pitcher D, Walsh V, Yovel G, Duchaine B (2007) TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing. Current Biology 17: 1568–1573.
|
| [50] | McCarthy G, Puce A, Belger A, Allison T (1999) Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb Cortex 9: 431–444.
|
| [51] | Rossion B, Caldara R, Seghier M, Schuller AM, Lazeyras F, et al. (2003) A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain 126: 2381–2395.
|
| [52] | Rotshtein P, Henson RN, Treves A, Driver J, Dolan RJ (2005) Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nat Neurosci 8: 107–113.
|
| [53] | Barlow HB (1972) Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Perception 1: 371–394.
|
| [54] | Lerner Y, Hendler T, Ben-Bashat D, Harel M, Malach R (2001) A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 11: 287–297.
|
| [55] | Tanaka K (1996) Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 19: 109–139.
|
| [56] | Yovel G, Kanwisher N (2005) The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect. Current Biology 15: 2256–2262.
|
| [57] | Zhu Q, Zhang J, Luo YL, Dilks DD, Liu J (2011) Resting-state neural activity across face-selective cortical regions is behaviorally relevant. J Neurosci 31: 10323–10330.
|
| [58] | Steeves JK, Culham JC, Duchaine BC, Pratesi CC, Valyear KF, et al. (2006) The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area. Neuropsychologia 44: 594–609.
|
