全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040259

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Proponents of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) claim that certain eye-movements are reliable indicators of lying. According to this notion, a person looking up to their right suggests a lie whereas looking up to their left is indicative of truth telling. Despite widespread belief in this claim, no previous research has examined its validity. In Study 1 the eye movements of participants who were lying or telling the truth were coded, but did not match the NLP patterning. In Study 2 one group of participants were told about the NLP eye-movement hypothesis whilst a second control group were not. Both groups then undertook a lie detection test. No significant differences emerged between the two groups. Study 3 involved coding the eye movements of both liars and truth tellers taking part in high profile press conferences. Once again, no significant differences were discovered. Taken together the results of the three studies fail to support the claims of NLP. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

References

[1]  Ekman P (2001) Telling lies. Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
[2]  Vrij A (2008) Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.
[3]  Bandler R, Grindler J (1975) The structure of magic I. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
[4]  Heap M (2008) The validity of some early claims of neuro-linguistic programming. Skeptical Intelligencer 11: 6–13.
[5]  Sharpley CF (1984) Predicate matching in NLP: A review of research on the preferred representational system. J Couns Psychol 31: 238–248.
[6]  Sharpley CF (1987) Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory? J Couns Psychol 34: 103–107.
[7]  Thomason TC, Arbuckle T, Cady D (1980) Test of the Eye Movement Hypothesis of Neurolinguistic Programming. Percept Mot Skills 51: 230.
[8]  Elich M, Thompson RW, Miller L (1985) Mental imagery as revealed by eye movements and spoken predicates: A test of neurolinguistic programming. J Couns Psychol 32: 622–625.
[9]  Beck CE, Beck EA (1984) Test of the Eye-Movement Hypothesis of Neurolinguistic Programming: A rebuttal of conclusions. Percept Mot Skills 58: 175–176.
[10]  Gray R (1991) Tools for the trade: Neuro-linguistic programming and the art of communication. Fed Probat 55: 11–16.
[11]  Rhoads SA, Solomon R (1987) Subconscious rapport building: Another approach to interviewing. The Police Chief 4: 39–41.
[12]  Vrij A, Lochun SK (1997) Neuro-linguistic programming and the police: Worthwhile or not? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 12: 25–31.
[13]  Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97–113.
[14]  Porter S, ten Brinke L (2010) The truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? Legal and Criminological Psychology 15: 57–75.
[15]  ten Brinke L, Porter S(in press) Cry me a river: Identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception. Law Hum Behav. Available at https://people.ok.ubc.ca/stporter/Public?ations_files/Cry%20Me%20a%20River%20-%20?in%20press.pdf.
[16]  Chapman LJ, Chapman JP (1967) Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. J Abnorm Psychol 72: 193–204.
[17]  Redelmeier DA Tversky A (1996) On the belief that arthritis pain is related to the weather. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 2895–6.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133