全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

The Steppengrille (Gryllus spec./assimilis): Selective Filters and Signal Mismatch on Two Time Scales

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043975

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In Europe, several species of crickets are available commercially as pet food. Here we investigated the calling song and phonotactic selectivity for sound patterns on the short and long time scales for one such a cricket, Gryllus spec., available as “Gryllus assimilis”, the Steppengrille, originally from Ecuador. The calling song consisted of short chirps (2–3 pulses, carrier frequency: 5.0 kHz) emitted with a pulse period of 30.2 ms and chirp rate of 0.43 per second. Females exhibited high selectivity on both time scales. The preference for pulse period peaked at 33 ms which was higher then the pulse period produced by males. Two consecutive pulses per chirp at the correct pulse period were already sufficient for positive phonotaxis. The preference for the chirp pattern was limited by selectivity for small chirp duty cycles and for chirp periods between 200 ms and 500 ms. The long chirp period of the songs of males was unattractive to females. On both time scales a mismatch between the song signal of the males and the preference of females was observed. The variability of song parameters as quantified by the coefficient of variation was below 50% for all temporal measures. Hence, there was not a strong indication for directional selection on song parameters by females which could account for the observed mismatch. The divergence of the chirp period and female preference may originate from a founder effect, when the Steppengrille was cultured. Alternatively the mismatch was a result of selection pressures exerted by commercial breeders on low singing activity, to satisfy customers with softly singing crickets. In the latter case the prominent divergence between male song and female preference was the result of domestication and may serve as an example of rapid evolution of song traits in acoustic communication systems.

References

[1]  Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[2]  Huber F, Moore TEM, Loher W (1989) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
[3]  Otte D (1992) The evolution of cricket songs. J Orthoptera Res 1: 25–49.
[4]  Desutter- Grandcolas L, Robillard T (2003) Phylogeny and the evolution of calling songs in Gryllus (Insecta, Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Zool. Scripta 32: 173–183.
[5]  Schildberger K (1984) Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol A 155: 171–185.
[6]  Hedwig B, Poulet JFA (2004) Complex auditory behaviour emerges from simple reactive steering. Nature 430: 781–785.
[7]  Hennig RM (2009) Walking in Fourier's space: algorithms for the computation of periodicities in song patterns by the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 195: 971–987.
[8]  Hennig RM (2003) Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets? J Comp Physiol A 189: 589–598.
[9]  Doherty JA (1985) Trade-off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 156: 787–801.
[10]  Trobe D, Schuster R, R?mer H (2011) Fast and reliable decisions for a dynamic song parameter in field crickets. J Comp Physiol A 197: 131–135.
[11]  Grobe B, Rothbart MM, Hanschke A, Hennig RM (2012) Auditory processing at two time scales by the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Exp Biol 215: 1681–1690.
[12]  Deily JA, Schul J (2009) Seletive phonotaxis in Neoconocephalus nebrascensis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): call recognition at two temporal scales. J Comp Physiol A 195: 31–37.
[13]  Weissman DB, Walker TJ, Gray AD (2009) The field cricket Gryllus assimilis and two new sister species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 102: 367–380.
[14]  Walker TJ (1975) Effects of temperature on rates in poikilotherm nervous systems: evidence from the calling songs of meadow katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Orchelimum) and reanalysis of published data. J Comp Physiol 101: 57–69.
[15]  Schneider E, Hennig RM (2012) Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 198: 181–191.
[16]  Weber T, Thorson J, Huber F (1981) Auditory behaviour of the cricket. I. Dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the Kramer treadmill. J Comp Physiol 141: 215–232.
[17]  Verburgt L, Ferguson JWH, Weber T (2008) Phonotactic response of female crickets on the Kramer treadmill: methodology, sensory and behavioural implications. J Comp Physiol A 194: 79–96.
[18]  Poulet JFA, Hedwig B (2005) Auditory orientation in crickets: Pattern recognition controls reactive steering. PNAS 102: 15665–15669.
[19]  Schul J (1998) Song recognition by temporal cues in a group of closely related bushcricket species (genus Tettigonia). J Comp Physiol A183: 401–410.
[20]  Barber CB, Dobkin DP, Huhdanpaa HT (1996) The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 22: 469–483.
[21]  Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp S (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
[22]  Gerhardt HC (1991) Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav 42: 615–635.
[23]  Kostarakos K, Hennig RM, R?mer H (2009) Two matched filters and the evolution of mating signals in four species of cricket. Frontiers in Zoology 2009, 6: 22 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-22.
[24]  Alexander RD (1968) Life cycle origins, speciation and related phenomena in crickets. Quart Rev Biol 43: 1–41.
[25]  Schmidt AKD, R?mer H (2011) Solutions to the cocktail party problem in insects: selective filters, spatial release from masking and gain control in tropical crickets. PLoS ONE 6(12):e28593 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028593.
[26]  Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist 139: 125–153.
[27]  Anderson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[28]  Hack MA (1998) The energetics of male mating strategies in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllinae: Gryllidae). J Insect Behav 11: 853–867.
[29]  Hennig RM (1990) Neuronal control of the forewings in two different behaviours: Stridulation and flight in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus. J Comp Physiol A 167: 617–627.
[30]  Wiley C, Ellison CK, Shaw KL (2012) Widespread genetic linkage of mating signals and preferences in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Proc R Soc B 279: 1203–1209.
[31]  Zuk M, Rotenberry JT, Tinghitella RM (2006) Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol Lett 2006: 521–524.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133