Primate behavioural and cognitive research is increasingly conducted on direct public view in zoo settings. The potential of such facilities for public engagement with science is often heralded, but evidence of tangible, positive effects on public understanding is rare. Here, the effect of a new zoo-based primate research centre on visitor behaviour, learning and attitudes was assessed using a quasi-experimental design. Zoo visitors approached the primate research centre more often when a scientist was present and working with the primates, and reported greater awareness of primates (including conservation) compared to when the scientist was not present. Visitors also reported greater perceived learning when the scientist was present. Installation of information signage had no main effect on visitor attitudes or learning. Visitors who interacted with the signage, however, demonstrated increased knowledge and understanding when asked about the specific information present on the signs (which was related to the ongoing facial expression research at the research centre). The findings show that primate behaviour research centres on public view can have a demonstrable and beneficial effect on public understanding of science.
References
[1]
Bowler MT, Buchanan-Smith HM, Whiten A (2012) Assessing public engagement with science in a university primate research centre in a national zoo. PloS one 7: e34505.
[2]
Ross SR, Gillespie KL (2009) Influences on Visitor Behavior at a Modern Immersive Zoo Exhibit. Zoo Biology 28: 462–472.
[3]
Ross SR, Lukas KE (2005) Zoo visitor behaviour at an african ape exhibit. Visitor Studies Today 8: 4–12.
[4]
Borun M, Chambers M, Cleghorn A (1996) Families are learning in science museums. Curator 39: 123–138.
[5]
Ross SR, Lukas KE, Lonsdorf EV, Stoinski TS, Hare B, et al. (2008) Science priorities - Inappropriate use and portrayal of chimpanzees. Science 319: 1487–1487.
[6]
Ross SR, Vreeman VM, Lonsdorf EV (2011) Specific Image Characteristics Influence Attitudes about Chimpanzee Conservation and Use as Pets. Plos One 6.
[7]
Heinrich CJ, Birney BA (1992) Effects of live animal demonstrations on zoo visitors retention of information. Anthrozoos 5: 113–121.
[8]
Visscher NC, Snider R, Stoep GV (2009) Comparative Analysis of Knowledge Gain Between Interpretive and Fact-Only Presentations at an Animal Training Session: An Exploratory Study. Zoo Biology 28: 488–495.
[9]
Micheletta J, Waller BM (2012) Friendship affects gaze following in a tolerant species of macaque, Macaca nigra. Animal Behaviour 83: 459–467.
[10]
Waller BM, Micheletta J Facial expression in non-human animals. Emotion Review In press.
[11]
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour - sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.
[12]
Guggisberg AG, Mathis J, Schnider A, Hess CW (2010) Why do we yawn? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 34: 1267–1276.
[13]
Hadidian J (1980) Yawning in an Old World monkey, Macaca nigra (Primates: Cercopithecidae). Behaviour 75: 133–147.
[14]
Anderson US, Kelling AS, Pressley-Keough R, Bloomsmith MA, Maple TL (2003) Enhancing the zoo visitor's experience by public animal training and oral interpretation at an otter exhibit. Environment and Behavior 35: 826–841.
[15]
Hasserd J (2002) Accelerating achievement for every student: Using differentiated instruction, inquiry-based science and other high impact strategies for your classroom: Northington-Hearn Publishers.
