全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Structural Design Principles of Complex Bird Songs: A Network-Based Approach

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044436

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Bird songs are acoustic communication signals primarily used in male-male aggression and in male-female attraction. These are often monotonous patterns composed of a few phrases, yet some birds have extremely complex songs with a large phrase repertoire, organized in non-random fashion with discernible patterns. Since structure is typically associated with function, the structures of complex bird songs provide important clues to the evolution of animal communication systems. Here we propose an efficient network-based approach to explore structural design principles of complex bird songs, in which the song networks–transition relationships among different phrases and the related structural measures–are employed. We demonstrate how this approach works with an example using California Thrasher songs, which are sequences of highly varied phrases delivered in succession over several minutes. These songs display two distinct features: a large phrase repertoire with a ‘small-world’ architecture, in which subsets of phrases are highly grouped and linked with a short average path length; and a balanced transition diversity amongst phrases, in which deterministic and non-deterministic transition patterns are moderately mixed. We explore the robustness of this approach with variations in sample size and the amount of noise. Our approach enables a more quantitative study of global and local structural properties of complex bird songs than has been possible to date.

References

[1]  Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2008) Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition.
[2]  Marler P, Tamura M (1962) Song ‘dialects’ in three populations of white-crowned sparrows. Condor 64: 368–377.
[3]  Zann RA (1996) The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies. Oxford University Press.
[4]  Lemon RE, Dobson CW, Clifoton PG (1993) Songs of American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla): sequencing rules and their relationships to repertoire size. Ethology 93: 198–210.
[5]  Okanoya K (2004) Song syntax in Bengalese finches: proximate and ultimate analyses. Advances in the Study of Behavior 34: 297–346.
[6]  Kroodsma DE (2005) The Singing Life of Birds: The Art and Science Listening to Birdsong. Houghton Mifflin.
[7]  Byers BE, Kroodsma DE (2009) Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Animal Behaviour 77: 13–22.
[8]  Marler P, Slabbekoorn H, editors (2004) Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong, Academic Press. 39–79.
[9]  Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton University Press.
[10]  Kipper S, Kiefer S (2010) Age-Related Changes in Birds' Singing Styles: On Fresh Tunes and Fading Voices? Advances in the Study of Behavior 41: 77–118.
[11]  Garamszegi LZ, Balsby TJS, Bell BD, Borowiec M, Byers BE, et al. (2005) Estimating the complexity of bird song by using capture-recapture approaches from community ecology. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57: 305–317.
[12]  Chatfield C, Lemon RE (1970) Analysing Sequences of Behavioural Events. Journal of Theoretical Biology 29: 427–445.
[13]  Dobson WC, Lemon ER (1979) Markov sequences in songs of American thrushes. Behaviour 68: 86–105.
[14]  Todt D, Hultsch H (1998) How songbirds deal with large amounts of serial information: retrieval rules suggest a hierarchical song memory. Biological Cybernetics 79: 487–500.
[15]  Kakishita Y, Sasahara K, Nishino T, Takahasi M, Okanoya K (2009) Ethological data mining: an automata-based approach to extract behavioral units and rules. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 18: 446–471.
[16]  Jin DZ, Kozhevnikov AA (2011) A compact statistical model of the song syntax in Bengalese finch. PLoS Computational Biology 7: e1001108.
[17]  Cody ML (1998) California Thrasher (Toxostoma redivivum). The Birds of North America Online; (A Poole, Ed) Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online http://bnabirdscornelledu/bna/species/32?3 doi:102173/bna323.
[18]  Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 20: 273–297.
[19]  Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45: 167–256.
[20]  Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, et al. (2002) Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298: 824–827.
[21]  Bollobás B (2001) Random graphs. Cambridge University Press.
[22]  Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393: 440–442.
[23]  Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL (2000) The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407: 651–654.
[24]  Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabási AL, Oltvai ZN (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411: 41–42.
[25]  Lusseau D (2003) The emergent properties of a dolphin social network. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270: S186–S188.
[26]  Humphries MD, Gurney K (2008) Network ‘small-world-ness’: a quantitative method for determining canonical network equivalence. PLoS ONE 3: e0002051.
[27]  Ferrer i Cancho R, Sole RV (2001) The small world of human language. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 268: 2261–2265.
[28]  Wey T, Blumstein DT, Shen W, Jordan F (2008) Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Animal Behaviour 75: 333–344.
[29]  Fehér O, Wang H, Saar S, Mitra PP, Tchernichovski O (2009) De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finch. Nature 459: 564–568.
[30]  SearcyWA (1984) Song repertoire size and female preferences in song sparrows. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 14: 281–286.
[31]  Baker MC, Bjerke TK, Lampe H, Espmark Y (1986) Sexual-response of female great tits to variation in size of males' song repertoires. The American Naturalist 128: 491–498.
[32]  Hiebert SM, Stoddard PK, Arcese P (1989) Repertoire size, territory acquisition and reproductive success in the song sparrow. Animal Behaviour 37: 266–273.
[33]  Catchpole CK (1980) Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Complex Songs Among European Warblers of the Genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74: 149–165.
[34]  Sasahara K, Ikegami T (2007) Evolution of Birdsong Syntax by Interjection Communication. Artificial Life 13: 259–77.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133