全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2008 

A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002554

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been able to replicate the sound quality of these classical instruments. The vibration and sound radiation characteristics of a violin are determined by an instrument's geometry and the material properties of the wood. New test methods allow the non-destructive examination of one of the key material properties, the wood density, at the growth ring level of detail. The densities of five classical and eight modern violins were compared, using computed tomography and specially developed image-processing software. No significant differences were found between the median densities of the modern and the antique violins, however the density difference between wood grains of early and late growth was significantly smaller in the classical Cremonese violins compared with modern violins, in both the top (Spruce) and back (Maple) plates (p = 0.028 and 0.008, respectively). The mean density differential (SE) of the top plates of the modern and classical violins was 274 (26.6) and 183 (11.7) gram/liter. For the back plates, the values were 128 (2.6) and 115 (2.0) gram/liter. These differences in density differentials may reflect similar changes in stiffness distributions, which could directly impact vibrational efficacy or indirectly modify sound radiation via altered damping characteristics. Either of these mechanisms may help explain the acoustical differences between the classical and modern violins.

References

[1]  Sacconi SF (1979) The “Secrets” of Stradivari. Cremona, Italy: Libreria Del Convegno.
[2]  Loen JS, Borman T, King AT (2005) A path through the woods; thickness and density of Guarneri del Gesu's violins. The Strad 116: 68–75.
[3]  Schelling JC (2007) On the physical effects of violin varnish, III Estimation of acoustical effects. CAS Journal 8: 17–24.
[4]  Schleske M (1998) On the acoustical properties of violin varnish. CAS Journal 3: 27–43.
[5]  Wegst UGK (2006) Wood for Sound. American Journal of Botany 93: 1439–1448.
[6]  McIntyre ME, Woodhouse J (1988) On measuring the elastic and damping constants of orthotropic sheet materials. Acta Metallurgica 36: 1397–1416.
[7]  Haines D (1979) On Musical Instrument Wood Part l. CAS Newletter 31: 23–32.
[8]  Haines D (1980) On Musical Instrument Wood Part II. Surface finishes, plywood, light and water exposure. CAS Newletter 33: 19–23.
[9]  Bucur V (2006) Acoustics of Wood. CRC Press.
[10]  Butterfield BG (2003) Wood anatomy in relation to wood quality. In: Barnett JR, Jeronimidis G, editors. Wood quality and its biological basis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 30–52.
[11]  Zink-Sharp A (2003) Mechanical Properties of Wood. In: Barnett JR, Jeronimidis G, editors. Wood Quality and Its Biological Basis. Oxfordshire, UK: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 197–209.
[12]  Schleske M (2002) Empirical Tools in Contemporary Violin Making: Part II. Psychoacoustic Analysis and Use of Acoustical Tools. CAS Journal 4: 50–64.
[13]  Gattoni F, Melgara C, Sicola C, Uslenghi CM (1999) [Unusual application of computerized tomography: the study of musical instruments]. Radiol Med (Torino) 97: 170–173.
[14]  Sirr SA, Waddle JR (1997) CT analysis of bowed stringed instruments. Radiology 203: 801–805.
[15]  Skolnick AA (1997) CT scans probe secrets of Italian masters' violins. JAMA 278: 2128–2130.
[16]  Stoel BC, Stolk J (2004) Optimization and Standardization of Lung Densitometry in the Assessment of Pulmonary Emphysema. Invest Radiol 39: 681–688.
[17]  Loen JS (2005) Thickness Graduation Maps Classic violins, Violas and Cellos. Kenmore.
[18]  Saranp?? P (2003) Wood density and growth. In: Barnett JR, Jeronimidis G, editors. Wood quality and its biological basis. London & Boca Raton, FL: Blackwell & CRC Press. pp. 87–117.
[19]  Koubaa A, Zhang SYT, Makni S (2002) Defining the transition from early wood to latewood in black spruce based on intra-ring wood density profiles from X-ray densitometry. Ann For Sci 59: 511–518.
[20]  Wilhelmsson L, Arlinger J, Sp?ngberg K, Lundqvist S-O, Hedenber ?, et al. (2002) Models for Predicting Wood Properties in Stems of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17: 330–350.
[21]  Giordano G (1971) Tecnologia del Legno. Torino, Italy: UTET.
[22]  Di Bella A, Piasentini RZ (2002) Violin Top Wood Qualification: Influence of Growth Ring Distance on Acoustical Properties of Red Spruce. CAS Journal 4: 22–25.
[23]  Eriksson K-EL, Blanchette RA, Ander P (1990) Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Wood and Wood Components. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[24]  Barlow CY, Woodhouse J (1990) Bordered pits in spruce from old Italian violins. Journal of Microscopy 160: 203–211.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133