全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Dynamics of Passive and Active Particles in the Cell Nucleus

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045843

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Inspite of being embedded in a dense meshwork of nuclear chromatin, gene loci and large nuclear components are highly dynamic at C. To understand this apparent unfettered movement in an overdense environment, we study the dynamics of a passive micron size bead in live cell nuclei at two different temperatures ( and C) with and without external force. In the absence of a force, the beads are caged over large time scales. On application of a threshold uniaxial force (about 10 pN), the passive beads appear to hop between cages; this large scale movement is absent upon ATP-depletion, inhibition of chromatin remodeling enzymes and RNAi of lamin B1 proteins. Our results suggest that the nucleus behaves like an active solid with a finite yield stress when probed at a micron scale. Spatial analysis of histone fluorescence anisotropy (a measure of local chromatin compaction, defined as the volume fraction of tightly bound chromatin) shows that the bead movement correlates with regions of low chromatin compaction. This suggests that the physical mechanism of the observed yielding is the active opening of free-volume in the nuclear solid via chromatin remodeling. Enriched transcription sites at C also show caging in the absence of the applied force and directed movement beyond a yield stress, in striking contrast with the large scale movement of transcription loci at C in the absence of a force. This suggests that at physiological temperatures, the loci behave as active particles which remodel the nuclear mesh and reduce the local yield stress.

References

[1]  Pombo A, Branco MR (2007) Functional organisation of the genome during interphase. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 451–455.
[2]  Banerjee B, Bhattacharya D, Shivashankar GV (2006) Chromatin structure exhibits spatio-temporal heterogeneity within the cell nucleus. Biophys J 91: 2297–2303.
[3]  Tseng Y, Lee JSH, Kole TP, Jiang I, Wirtz D (2004) Micro-organization and viscoelasticity of the interphase nucleus revealed by particle nanotracking. J Cell Sci 117: 2159–2167.
[4]  Smith CL, Peterson CL (2005) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Curr Top Dev Biol 65: 115–148.
[5]  Sinha DK, Banerjee B, Maharana S, Shivashankar GV (2008) Probing the dynamic organization of transcription compartments and gene loci within the nucleus of living cells. Biophys J 95: 5432–5438.
[6]  Platani M, Goldberg I, Lamond AI, Swedlow JR (2002) Cajal body dynamics and association with chromatin are ATP-dependent. Nat Cell Biol 4: 502–508.
[7]  Shav-Tal Y, Darzacq X, Shenoy SM, Fusco D, Janicki SM, et al. (2004) Dynamics of single mRNPs in nuclei of living cells. Science 304: 1797–1800.
[8]  Bhattacharya D, Mazumder A, Miriam SA, Shivashankar GV (2006) EGFP-tagged core and linker histones diffuse via distinct mechanisms within living cells. Biophys J 91: 2326–2336.
[9]  Gorisch SM, Wachsmuth M, Ittrich C, Bacher CP, Rippe K, et al. (2004) Nuclear body movement is determined by chromatin accessibility and dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 13221–13226.
[10]  Dahl KN, Engler AJ, Pajerowski JD, Discher DE (2005) Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures. Biophys J 89: 2855–2864.
[11]  Guigas G, Kalla C, Weiss M (2007) Probing the nanoscale viscoelasticity of intracellular fluids in living cells. Biophys J 93: 316–323.
[12]  Soutoglou E, Misteli T (2007) Mobility and immobility of chromatin in transcription and genome stability. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 435–442.
[13]  Lusser A, Kadonaga JT (2003) Chromatin remodeling by ATP-dependent molecular machines. Bioessays 25: 1192–1200.
[14]  Varga-Weisz PD, Becker PB (2006) Regulation of higher-order chromatin structures by nucleosome-remodelling factors. Curr Opin Genet Dev 16: 151–156.
[15]  Gowrishankar K, Ghosh S, Saha S, Rumamol C, Mayor S, et al. (2012) Active Remodeling of Cortical Actin Regulates Spatiotemporal Organization of Cell Surface Molecules. Cell 149: 1353–1368.
[16]  Mazumder A, Roopa T, Basu A, Mahadevan L, Shivashankar GV (2008) Dynamics of chromatin decondensation reveals the structural integrity of a mechanically prestressed nucleus. Biophys J 95: 3028–3035.
[17]  Mason TG, Weitz DA (1995) Linear viscoelasticity of colloidal hard sphere suspensions near the glass transition. Phys Rev Lett 74: 1250–1254.
[18]  MacKintosh FC, Schmidt CF (1999) Microrheology. Current Opinion in Coll & Interf Sci 4: 300.
[19]  Lau ACW, Hoffman BD, Davies A, Crocker JC, Lubensky TC (2003) Microrheology, stress fluctuations and active behavior of living cells. Phys Rev Lett 91: 198101.
[20]  Hatwalne Y, Ramaswamy S, Rao M, Simha RA (2004) Rheology of active-particle suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 92: 118101.
[21]  Basu A, Joanny JF, Julicher F, Prost J (2008) Thermal and non-thermal fluctuations in active polar gels. Eur Phys J E 27: 149–160.
[22]  Wirtz D (2009) Particle-tracking microrheology of living cells: principles and applications. Ann Rev Biophys 38: 301–326.
[23]  Hameed FM, Soni GV, Krishnamurthy H, Shivashankar GV (2009) Probing structural stability of chromatin assembly sorted from living cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 385: 518–522.
[24]  Toth KF, Knoch TA, Wachsmuth M, Frank-Stohr M, Stohr M, et al. (2004) Trichostatin A-induced histone acetylation causes decondensation of interphase chromatin. J Cell Sci 117: 4277–4287.
[25]  Robertson J, Orrenius S, Zhivotovsky B (2000) Nuclear events in apoptosis. Eur J Pharmacol 129: 346–358.
[26]  Gruenbaum Y, Margalit A, Goldman RD, Shumaker DK, Wilson KL (2005) The nuclear lamina comes of age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 21–31.
[27]  Martin C, Chen S, Maya-Mendoza A, Lovric J, Sims JF, et al. (2009) Lamin B1 maintains the functional plasticity of nucleoli. J Cell Sci 122: 1551–1562.
[28]  Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E, Meuleman W, Faza MB, et al. (2008) Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453: 948–951.
[29]  Taniura H, Glass C, Gerace L (1995) A chromatin binding site in the tail domain of nuclear lamins that interacts with core histones. J Cell Biol 131: 33–44.
[30]  Shimi T, Pfleghaar k, Kojima SI, Pack CG, Solovei I, et al. (2008) The A- and B-type nuclear lamin networks: microdomains involved in chromatin organization and transcription. Genes Dev 22: 3409–3421.
[31]  Maharana S, Sharma D, Xianke S, Shivashankar GV (2012) Dynamic organization of transcription factories is dependent on functional nuclear architecture. Biophys J in press.
[32]  Lackowicz JR (2004) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Second Edition. Springer Science, NY.
[33]  Eyring H (1936) Viscosity, Plasticity, and Diffusion as Examples of Absolute Reaction Rates. J Chem Phys 4: 283–291.
[34]  Cohen MH, Turnbull D (1959) Molecular Transport in Liquids and Glasses. J Chem Phys 31: 1164–1169.
[35]  Weber SC, Spakowitz AJ, Theriot JA (2012) Nonthermal ATP-dependent fluctuations contribute to the in vivo motion of chromosomal loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 7338–7343.
[36]  Celedon A, Hale CM, Wirtz D (2011) Magnetic Manipulation of Nanorods in the Nucleus of Living Cells. Biophys J 101: 1880–1886.
[37]  Chaudhuri A, Bhattacharya B, Gowrishankar K, Mayor S, Rao M (2011) Spatiotemporal regulation of chemical reactions by active cytoskeletal remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 14825–14830.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133