全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2009 

Long-Term Potentiation in Isolated Dendritic Spines

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006021

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background In brain, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (NMDAR) activation can induce long-lasting changes in synaptic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-pr?opionate(AMPA) receptor (AMPAR) levels. These changes are believed to underlie the expression of several forms of synaptic plasticity, including long-term potentiation (LTP). Such plasticity is generally believed to reflect the regulated trafficking of AMPARs within dendritic spines. However, recent work suggests that the movement of molecules and organelles between the spine and the adjacent dendritic shaft can critically influence synaptic plasticity. To determine whether such movement is strictly required for plasticity, we have developed a novel system to examine AMPAR trafficking in brain synaptosomes, consisting of isolated and apposed pre- and postsynaptic elements. Methodology/Principal Findings We report here that synaptosomes can undergo LTP-like plasticity in response to stimuli that mimic synaptic NMDAR activation. Indeed, KCl-evoked release of endogenous glutamate from presynaptic terminals, in the presence of the NMDAR co-agonist glycine, leads to a long-lasting increase in surface AMPAR levels, as measured by [3H]-AMPA binding; the increase is prevented by an NMDAR antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5). Importantly, we observe an increase in the levels of GluR1 and GluR2 AMPAR subunits in the postsynaptic density (PSD) fraction, without changes in total AMPAR levels, consistent with the trafficking of AMPARs from internal synaptosomal compartments into synaptic sites. This plasticity is reversible, as the application of AMPA after LTP depotentiates synaptosomes. Moreover, depotentiation requires proteasome-dependent protein degradation. Conclusions/Significance Together, the results indicate that the minimal machinery required for LTP is present and functions locally within isolated dendritic spines.

References

[1]  Malenka RC, Nicoll RA (1999) Long-term potentiation–a decade of progress? Science 285: 1870–1874.
[2]  Park M, Penick EC, Edwards JG, Kauer JA, Ehlers MD (2004) Recycling endosomes supply AMPA receptors for LTP. Science 305: 1972–1975.
[3]  Malinow R, Malenka RC (2002) AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 25: 103–126.
[4]  Bredt DS, Nicoll RA (2003) AMPA receptor trafficking at excitatory synapses. Neuron 40: 361–379.
[5]  Collingridge GL, Isaac JT, Wang YT (2004) Receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 952–962.
[6]  Song I, Huganir RL (2002) Regulation of AMPA receptors during synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci 25: 578–588.
[7]  Ehlers MD (2000) Reinsertion or degradation of AMPA receptors determined by activity-dependent endocytic sorting. Neuron 28: 511–525.
[8]  Liang F, Huganir RL (2001) Coupling of agonist-induced AMPA receptor internalization with receptor recycling. J Neurochem 77: 1626–1631.
[9]  Bloodgood BL, Sabatini BL (2005) Neuronal activity regulates diffusion across the neck of dendritic spines. Science 310: 866–869.
[10]  Newpher TM, Ehlers MD (2009) Spine microdomains for postsynaptic signaling and plasticity. Trends Cell Biol.
[11]  Park M, Salgado JM, Ostroff L, Helton TD, Robinson CG, et al. (2006) Plasticity-induced growth of dendritic spines by exocytic trafficking from recycling endosomes. Neuron 52: 817–830.
[12]  Nichols RA, Sihra TS, Czernik AJ, Nairn AC, Greengard P (1990) Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II increases glutamate and noradrenaline release from synaptosomes. Nature 343: 647–651.
[13]  Rao A, Steward O (1991) Evidence that protein constituents of postsynaptic membrane specializations are locally synthesized: analysis of proteins synthesized within synaptosomes. J Neurosci 11: 2881–2895.
[14]  Fallon L, Moreau F, Croft BG, Labib N, Gu WJ, et al. (2002) Parkin and CASK/LIN-2 associate via a PDZ-mediated interaction and are co-localized in lipid rafts and postsynaptic densities in brain. J Biol Chem 277: 486–491.
[15]  Fallon L, Belanger CM, Corera AT, Kontogiannea M, Regan-Klapisz E, et al. (2006) A regulated interaction with the UIM protein Eps15 implicates parkin in EGF receptor trafficking and PI(3)K-Akt signalling. Nat Cell Biol 8: 834–842.
[16]  Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254.
[17]  Massicotte G, Kessler M, Lynch G, Baudry M (1990) N-Methyl-D-aspartate and quisqualate/DL-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5- methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptors: differential regulation by phospholipase C treatment. Mol Pharmacol 37: 278–285.
[18]  Cho KO, Hunt CA, Kennedy MB (1992) The rat brain postsynaptic density fraction contains a homolog of the Drosophila discs-large tumor suppressor protein. Neuron 9: 929–942.
[19]  De Camilli P, Harris SM Jr, Huttner WB, Greengard P (1983) Synapsin I (Protein I), a nerve terminal-specific phosphoprotein. II. Its specific association with synaptic vesicles demonstrated by immunocytochemistry in agarose-embedded synaptosomes. J Cell Biol 96: 1355–1373.
[20]  Phillips GR, Huang JK, Wang Y, Tanaka H, Shapiro L, et al. (2001) The presynaptic particle web: ultrastructure, composition, dissolution, and reconstitution. Neuron 32: 63–77.
[21]  Lee SH, Valtschanoff JG, Kharazia VN, Weinberg R, Sheng M (2001) Biochemical and morphological characterization of an intracellular membrane compartment containing AMPA receptors. Neuropharmacology 41: 680–692.
[22]  Husi H, Ward MA, Choudhary JS, Blackstock WP, Grant SG (2000) Proteomic analysis of NMDA receptor-adhesion protein signaling complexes. Nat Neurosci 3: 661–669.
[23]  Kennedy MB (2000) Signal-processing machines at the postsynaptic density. Science 290: 750–754.
[24]  Cooney JR, Hurlburt JL, Selig DK, Harris KM, Fiala JC (2002) Endosomal compartments serve multiple hippocampal dendritic spines from a widespread rather than a local store of recycling membrane. J Neurosci 22: 2215–2224.
[25]  Lu W, Man H, Ju W, Trimble WS, MacDonald JF, et al. (2001) Activation of synaptic NMDA receptors induces membrane insertion of new AMPA receptors and LTP in cultured hippocampal neurons. Neuron 29: 243–254.
[26]  Kim E, Sheng M (2004) PDZ domain proteins of synapses. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 771–781.
[27]  Frey U, Krug M, Reymann KG, Matthies H (1988) Anisomycin, an inhibitor of protein synthesis, blocks late phases of LTP phenomena in the hippocampal CA1 region in vitro. Brain Res 452: 57–65.
[28]  Bradshaw KD, Emptage NJ, Bliss TV (2003) A role for dendritic protein synthesis in hippocampal late LTP. Eur J Neurosci 18: 3150–3152.
[29]  Fonseca R, Vabulas RM, Hartl FU, Bonhoeffer T, Nagerl UV (2006) A balance of protein synthesis and proteasome-dependent degradation determines the maintenance of LTP. Neuron 52: 239–245.
[30]  Tanaka J, Horiike Y, Matsuzaki M, Miyazaki T, Ellis-Davies GC, et al. (2008) Protein synthesis and neurotrophin-dependent structural plasticity of single dendritic spines. Science 319: 1683–1687.
[31]  Abraham WC, Williams JM (2008) LTP maintenance and its protein synthesis-dependence. Neurobiol Learn Mem 89: 260–268.
[32]  Bingol B, Schuman EM (2006) Activity-dependent dynamics and sequestration of proteasomes in dendritic spines. Nature 441: 1144–1148.
[33]  Ehlers MD (2003) Activity level controls postsynaptic composition and signaling via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Neurosci 6: 231–242.
[34]  Tai HC, Schuman EM (2008) Ubiquitin, the proteasome and protein degradation in neuronal function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 826–838.
[35]  Yi JJ, Ehlers MD (2007) Emerging roles for ubiquitin and protein degradation in neuronal function. Pharmacol Rev 59: 14–39.
[36]  Patrick GN, Bingol B, Weld HA, Schuman EM (2003) Ubiquitin-mediated proteasome activity is required for agonist-induced endocytosis of GluRs. Curr Biol 13: 2073–2081.
[37]  Guo L, Wang Y (2007) Glutamate stimulates glutamate receptor interacting protein 1 degradation by ubiquitin-proteasome system to regulate surface expression of GluR2. Neuroscience 145: 100–109.
[38]  Feng W, Zhang M (2009) Organization and dynamics of PDZ-domain-related supramodules in the postsynaptic density. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 87–99.
[39]  Vaithianathan T, Manivannan K, Kleene R, Bahr BA, Dey MP, et al. (2005) Single channel recordings from synaptosomal AMPA receptors. Cell Biochem Biophys 42: 75–85.
[40]  Hunt CA, Schenker LJ, Kennedy MB (1996) PSD-95 is associated with the postsynaptic density and not with the presynaptic membrane at forebrain synapses. J Neurosci 16: 1380–1388.
[41]  Moon IS, Apperson ML, Kennedy MB (1994) The major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in the postsynaptic density fraction is N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 2B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 3954–3958.
[42]  Bernard J, Massicotte G, Baudry M (1992) Potassium-induced depolarization of rat telencephalic synaptoneurosomes increases [3H]amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-?propionatereceptor binding. J Neurochem 58: 387–389.
[43]  Feligioni M, Holman D, Haglerod C, Davanger S, Henley JM (2006) Ultrastructural localisation and differential agonist-induced regulation of AMPA and kainate receptors present at the presynaptic active zone and postsynaptic density. J Neurochem 99: 549–560.
[44]  Lu W, Ziff EB (2005) PICK1 interacts with ABP/GRIP to regulate AMPA receptor trafficking. Neuron 47: 407–421.
[45]  Osten P, Khatri L, Perez JL, Kohr G, Giese G, et al. (2000) Mutagenesis reveals a role for ABP/GRIP binding to GluR2 in synaptic surface accumulation of the AMPA receptor. Neuron 27: 313–325.
[46]  Beique JC, Lin DT, Kang MG, Aizawa H, Takamiya K, et al. (2006) Synapse-specific regulation of AMPA receptor function by PSD-95. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A..
[47]  Matsuzaki M, Honkura N, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H (2004) Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature 429: 761–766.
[48]  Lee SJ, Escobedo-Lozoya Y, Szatmari EM, Yasuda R (2009) Activation of CaMKII in single dendritic spines during long-term potentiation. Nature 458: 299–304.
[49]  Ju W, Morishita W, Tsui J, Gaietta G, Deerinck TJ, et al. (2004) Activity-dependent regulation of dendritic synthesis and trafficking of AMPA receptors. Nat Neurosci 7: 244–253.
[50]  Araya R, Jiang J, Eisenthal KB, Yuste R (2006) The spine neck filters membrane potentials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 17961–17966.
[51]  Noguchi J, Matsuzaki M, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H (2005) Spine-neck geometry determines NMDA receptor-dependent Ca2+ signaling in dendrites. Neuron 46: 609–622.
[52]  Lang C, Barco A, Zablow L, Kandel ER, Siegelbaum SA, et al. (2004) Transient expansion of synaptically connected dendritic spines upon induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 16665–16670.
[53]  Tada T, Sheng M (2006) Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine morphogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16: 95–101.
[54]  Correia SS, Bassani S, Brown TC, Lise MF, Backos DS, et al. (2008) Motor protein-dependent transport of AMPA receptors into spines during long-term potentiation. Nat Neurosci 11: 457–466.
[55]  Wang Z, Edwards JG, Riley N, Provance DW Jr, Karcher R, et al. (2008) Myosin Vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity. Cell 135: 535–548.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133