Detecting signs that someone is a member of a hostile outgroup can depend on very subtle cues. How do ecology-relevant motivational states affect such detections? This research investigated the detection of briefly-presented enemy (versus friend) insignias after participants were primed to be self-protective or revenge-minded. Despite being told to ignore the objectively nondiagnostic cues of ethnicity (Arab vs. Western/European), gender, and facial expressions of the targets, both priming manipulations enhanced biases to see Arab males as enemies. They also reduced the ability to detect ingroup enemies, even when these faces displayed angry expressions. These motivations had very different effects on accuracy, however, with self-protection enhancing overall accuracy and revenge-mindedness reducing it. These methods demonstrate the importance of considering how signal detection tasks that occur in motivationally-charged environments depart from results obtained in conventionally motivationally-inert laboratory settings.
References
[1]
Neuberg SL, Kenrick DT, Schaller M (2011) Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35: 1042–1051.
[2]
Haselton MG, Buss DM (2000) Error Management Theory: A New Perspective on Biases in Cross-Sex Mind Reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 81–91.
[3]
Haselton MG, Nettle D (2006) The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10: 47–66.
[4]
Bugental DB (2000) Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin 126: 187–219.
[5]
Kenrick DK, Neuberg SL, Griskevicius V, Becker DV, Schaller M (2010) Goal-Driven Cognition and Functional Behavior: The Fundamental Motives Framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19: 63–67.
[6]
Becker DV, Neuberg SL, Maner JK, Shapiro JR, Ackerman JM, et al. (2010) More Memory Bang for the Attentional Buck: Adaptively Efficient Encoding of Interpersonal Threats. Social Psychological and Personality Science 1: 182–189.
[7]
Navarrete CD, Olsson A, Ho AK, Mendes WB, Thomsen L, et al. (2009) Fear extinction to an outgroup face: The role of target gender. Psychological Science 20: 155–158.
[8]
Shapiro JR, Ackerman JM, Neuberg SL, Maner JK, Becker DV, et al. (2009) Following in the wake of anger: When not discriminating is discriminating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35: 1356–1367.
[9]
Fiske ST, Neuberg SL (1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). New York: Academic Press.
[10]
Macrae CN, Quadflieg S (2010) Perceiving people. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, editors. The handbook of social psychology (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[11]
Fox E, Russo R, Dutton K (2001) Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition and emotion 16: 355–379.
[12]
Kurzban R, Neuberg SL (2005) Managing ingroup and outgroup relationships. In: Buss D, editor. Handbook of evolutionary psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 653–675.
[13]
Diamond J (1997) Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W.W. Norton & Company.
[14]
Van Vugt M, De Cremer D, Janssen D (2007) Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science 18: 19–23.
[15]
Brewer MB (1979) Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin 86: 307–324.
[16]
Ackerman JM, Shapiro JR, Neuberg SL, Kenrick DT, Becker DV, et al. (2006) They all look the same to me (unless they're angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science 17: 836–840.
[17]
Maner JK, Kenrick DT, Becker DV, Robertson T, Hofer B, et al. (2005) Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88: 63–78.
[18]
Daly M, Wilson M (1988) Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
[19]
Eberhardt JL, Goff PA, Purdie VJ, Davies PG (2004) Seeing Black: Race, Crime, and Visual Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87: 876–893.
[20]
Miller SL, Maner JK, Becker DV (2010) Self-protective biases in group categorization: Threat cues shape the psychological boundary between “us” and “them”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99: 62–77.
[21]
Correll J, Park B, Judd CM, Wittenbrink B (2002) The police officer's dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 1314–1329.
[22]
Plant EA, Peruche BM (2006) The Consequences of Race for Police Officers' Responses to Criminal Suspects. Psychological Science 16: 180–183.
[23]
Payne BK (2001) Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 181–192.
[24]
Plant EA, Devine PG (2003) The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 790–801.
[25]
Ferguson MJ, Bargh JA (2004) Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87: 557–572.
