| [1] | Birkhead TR, M？ller AP (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. New York: Academic Press.
|
| [2] | Simmons LW (2001) The evolution of polyandry: an examination of the genetic incompatibility and good-sperm hypotheses. Journal Evolutionary Biology 14: 585–594.
|
| [3] | Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2001) Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Animal Behaviour 61: 1051–1063.
|
| [4] | Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: Sperm competition, sperm selection and offspring viability. Annual Reviews of Ecology & Systematics 36: 125–146.
|
| [5] | Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews 75: 21–64.
|
| [6] | Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology 14: 19–38.
|
| [7] | Kokko H, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2006) Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 43–66.
|
| [8] | Birkhead TR, Moller AP, Sutherland WJ (1993) Why Do Females Make It So Difficult for Males to Fertilize Their Eggs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 161: 51–60.
|
| [9] | Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
|
| [10] | Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology 14: 19–38.
|
| [11] | Bilde T, Maklakov AA, Schilling N (2007) Inbreeding avoidance in spiders: evidence for rescue effect in fecundity of female spiders with outbreeding opportunity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1237–1242.
|
| [12] | Teng ZQ, Kang L (2007) Egg-hatching benefits gained by polyandrous female locusts are not due to the fertilization advantage of nonsibling males. Evolution 61: 470–476.
|
| [13] | Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2006) Outbred embryos rescue inbred half-siblings in mixed-paternity broods of live-bearing females. Nature 439: 201–203.
|
| [14] | Dunn PO, Lifjeld JT, Whittingham LA (2009) Multiple paternity and offspring quality in tree swallows. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63: 911–922.
|
| [15] | Yasui Y (1998) The ‘genetic benefits’ of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13: 246–250.
|
| [16] | Arnqvist G (1989) Multiple Mating in a Water Strider - Mutual Benefits or Intersexual Conflict. Animal Behaviour 38: 749–756.
|
| [17] | Hughes AR, Inouye BD, Johnson MTJ, Underwood N, Vellend M (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecology Letters 11: 609–623.
|
| [18] | Oldroyd BP, Rinderer TE, Harbo JR, Buco SM (1992) Effects of Intracolonial Genetic Diversity on Honey-Bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae) Colony Performance. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 85: 335–343.
|
| [19] | Ridley M (1993) Clutch Size and Mating Frequency in Parasitic Hymenoptera. American Naturalist 142: 893–910.
|
| [20] | Loman J, Madsen T, Hakansson T (1988) Increased Fitness from Multiple Matings, and Genetic-Heterogeneity - a Model of a Possible Mechanism. Oikos 52: 69–72.
|
| [21] | Cunningham EJA, Russell AF (2000) Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404: 74–77.
|
| [22] | Evans JP, Zane L, Francescato S, Pilastro A (2003) Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 421: 360–363.
|
| [23] | Ivy TM (2007) Good genes, genetic compatibility and the evolution of polyandry: use of the diallel cross to address competing hypotheses. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 479–487.
|
| [24] | Dziminski MA, Roberts JD, Simmons LW (2008) Fitness consequences of parental compatibility in the frog Crinia georgiana. Evolution 62: 879–886.
|
| [25] | Bode M, Marshall DJ (2007) The quick and the dead? Sperm competition and sexual conflict in the sea. Evolution.
|
| [26] | Marshall DJ, Evans JP (2005) The benefits of polyandry in the free-spawning polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa. J Evol Biol 18: 735–741.
|
| [27] | Marsden JR, Anderson DT (1981) Larval development and metamorphosis of the serpulid polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa Lamark. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 32: 667–680.
|
| [28] | Marshall DJ, Evans JP (2005) Does egg competition occur in marine broadcast spawners? J Evol Biol 18: 1244–1252.
|
| [29] | Marshall DJ, Evans JP (2007) Context dependent genetic benefits of polyandry in a marine hermaphrodite. Biology Letters 3: 685–688.
|
| [30] | Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press. 537 p.
|
| [31] | Evans JP, Marshall DJ (2005) Male x female interactions influence fertilisation success and mediate the benefits of polyandry in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Evolution 59: 106–112.
|
| [32] | Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2003) Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: Polyandry, conflict and incompatibility (Invited article). Ethology 109: 929–950.
|
| [33] | Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ (2004) Genetic diversity and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ant societies. Evolution 58: 1251–1260.
|
| [34] | Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2007) Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness. Science 317: 362–364.
|
| [35] | Griffiths SW, Armstrong JD (2001) The benefits of genetic diversity outweigh those of kin association in a territorial animal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 268: 1293–1296.
|
| [36] | Barton NH, Post RJ (1986) Sibling Competition and the Advantage of Mixed Families. Journal of Theoretical Biology 120: 381–387.
|
| [37] | Forsman A, Ahnesjo J, Caesar S (2007) Fitness benefits of diverse offspring in pygmy grasshoppers. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9: 1305–1318.
|
| [38] | Manahan DT (1990) Adaptations by invertebrate larvae for nutrient acquisition from seawater. American Zoologist 30: 147–160.
|
| [39] | Evans JP, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Marshall DJ (2007) Sources of genetic and phenotypic variation in sperm performance and larval traits in a sea urchin. Evolution 61: 2832–3838.
|
| [40] | Marshall DJ, Bolton TF (2007) Effects of egg size on the development time of non-feeding larvae. Biological Bulletin 212: 6–11.
|
| [41] | Marshall DJ (2002) In situ measures of spawning synchrony and fertilization success in an intertidal, free-spawning invertebrate. Marine Ecology Progress Series 236: 113–119.
|
| [42] | Marshall DJ, Semmens D, Cook C (2004) Consequences of spawning at low tide: limited gamete dispersal for a rockpool anemone. Marine Ecology Progress Series 266: 135–142.
|
| [43] | Castilla JC, Manriquez PH, Delgado AP, Gargallo L, Leiva A, et al. (2007) Bio-foam enhances larval retention in a free-spawning marine tunicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 18120–18122.
|
| [44] | Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: Sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 36: 125–146.
|
| [45] | Klemme I, Ylonen H, Eccard JA (2008) Long-term fitness benefits of polyandry in a small mammal, the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275: 1095–1100.
|
| [46] | Pai A, Feil S, Yan G (2007) Variation in polyandry and its fitness consequences among populations of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Evolutionary Ecology 21: 687–702.
|
| [47] | Dunn DW, Sumner JP, Goulson D (2005) The benefits of multiple mating to female seaweed flies, Coelopa frigida (Diptera: Coelpidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58: 128–135.
|
| [48] | Maklakov AA, Lubin Y (2006) Indirect genetic benefits of polyandry in a spider with direct costs of mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 31–38.
|
| [49] | Tregenza T, Wedell N (1998) Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52: 1726–1730.
|
| [50] | Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1997) The evolution of polyandry.2. Post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 264: 69–75.
|
