| [1] | Mishkin M, Forgays DG (1952) Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. J Exp Psychol 43: 43–48.
|
| [2] | Gazzaniga MS (2000) Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain 123: 1293–1326.
|
| [3] | Jordan TR, Paterson KB (2009) Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: a critical assessment of recent research. Neuropsychologia 47: 2341–2353.
|
| [4] | Lavidor M, Walsh V (2004) The nature of foveal representation. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 729–735.
|
| [5] | Lindell AK, Nicholls MER (2003) Cortical representation of the fovea: Implications for visual half-field research. Cortex 39: 111–117.
|
| [6] | Blakemore C (1969) Binocular depth discrimination and the nasotemporal division. J Physiol-London 205: 471–497.
|
| [7] | Brandt T, Stephan T, Bense S, Yousry TA, Dieterich M (2000) Hemifield visual motion stimulation: An example of interhemispheric crosstalk. Neuroreport 11: 2803–2809.
|
| [8] | Fendrich R, Wessinger CM, Gazzaniga MS (1996) Nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical meridian: Investigations with a callosotomy patient. Neuropsychologia 34: 637–646.
|
| [9] | Fukuda Y, Sawai H, Watanabe M, Wakakuwa K, Moriaiwa K (1989) Nasotemporal overlap of crossed and uncrossed retinal ganglion cell projections in the Japanese monkey (Macucuficuta). J Neurosci 9: 2353–2373.
|
| [10] | Gray LG, Galetta SL, Siegal T, Schatz NJ (1997) The central visual field in homonymous hemianopia: Evidence for unilateral foveal representation. Arch Neurol 54: 312–317.
|
| [11] | Jordan TR, Paterson KB (2010) Where is the evidence for split-fovea processing in word recognition? Neuropsychologia 48: 2782–2783.
|
| [12] | Leventhal AG, Ault SJ, Vitek DJ (1988) The nasotemporal division in primate retina: the neural bases of macular sparing and splitting. Science 240: 66–67.
|
| [13] | Marzi CA, Mancini F, Sperandio I, Savazzi S (2009) Evidence of midline retinal nasotemporal overlap in healthy human: A model for foveal sparing in hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 47: 3007–3011.
|
| [14] | Reinhard J, Trauzettel-Klosinski S (2003) Nasotemporal Overlap of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Humans: A Functional Study. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 4: 1568–1572.
|
| [15] | Stone J (1966) The naso-temporal division of the cat's retina. J Comp Neurol 126: 585–600.
|
| [16] | Stone J, Leicester J, Sherman SM (1973) The naso-temporal division of the monkey's retina. J Comp Neurol 150: 333–348.
|
| [17] | Sugishita M, Hamilton CR, Sakuma I, Hemmi I (1994) Hemispheric representations of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects. Neuropsychologia 32: 399–415.
|
| [18] | Tootell RB, Mendola JD, Hadjikhani NK, Liu AK, Dale AM (1998) The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. P Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 818–824.
|
| [19] | Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Reinhard J (1998) The vertical field border in hemianopia and its significance for fixation and reading. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 39: 2177–2186.
|
| [20] | Victor JD, Conte MM, Iadecola C (1991) Ocular dependence of hemifield visual evoked potentials: Relevance to bilateral cortical representation of central vision. Clin Vision Sci 4: 261–276.
|
| [21] | Kondo Y, Takada M, Kayahara T, Yasui Y, Nakano K, et al. (1992) Single retina ganglion cells sending axon collaterals to the bilateral superior colliculi: a fluorescent retrograde double-labeling study in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata). Brain Res 597: 155–161.
|
| [22] | Kondo Y, Takada M, Tokuno H, Mizuno N (1994) Single retinal ganglion cells projecting in bilaterally to the lateral geniculate nuclei or superior colliculi by way of axon collaterals in the cat. J Comp Neurol 346: 119–126.
|
| [23] | Wessinger CM, Fendrich R, Ptito A, Villemure J-G, Gazzaniga MS (1996) Residual vision with awareness in the field contralateral to a partial or complete functional hemispherectomy. Neuropsychologia 34: 1129–1137.
|
| [24] | Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Stachurski M (2008) Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance. Neuropsychology 22: 738–745.
|
| [25] | Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Kurtev S (2009) Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 9: 113–121.
|
| [26] | Friederici AD (2004) Event-related brain potential studies in language. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 4: 466–470.
|
| [27] | Hauk O, Davis MH, Ford M, Pulvermuller F, Marslen-Wilson WD (2006) The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage 30: 1383–1400.
|
| [28] | VanRullen R, Thorpe SJ (2001) The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making. J Cognitive Neurosci 13: 454–461.
|
| [29] | Martin CD, Thierry G, Démonet JF, Roberts M, Nazir T (2007) ERP evidence for the split fovea theory. Brain Res 1185: 212–220.
|
| [30] | Cornelissen P, Tarkiainen A, Helenius P, Salmelin R (2003) Cortical effects of shifting letter position in letter strings of varying length. J Cognitive Neurosci 15: 731–746.
|
| [31] | Sereno SC, Rayner K (2003) Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends Cogn Sci 7: 489–493.
|
| [32] | Tarkiainen A, Cornelissen PL, Salmelin R (2002) Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception. Brain 125: 1125–1136.
|
| [33] | Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Kurtev S, Xu M (2009) Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition? Neuropsychologia 47: 2004–2007.
|
| [34] | Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Kurtev S, Xu M (2010) Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: Effects of fixation location within words. Cortex 46: 298–309.
|
| [35] | Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Stachurski M (2009) Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length. Cortex 45: 495–505.
|
| [36] | Dehaene S, Cohen L, Sigman M, Vinckier F (2005) The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 335–341.
|
| [37] | Holcomb PJ, Grainger J (2006) On the time course of visual word recognition: an event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. J Cognitive Neurosci 18: 1631–1643.
|
| [38] | Mangun GR, Hillyard SA (1991) Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17: 1057–1074.
|
| [39] | Rossion B, Joyce CA, Cottrell GW, Tarr MJ (2003) Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. Neuroimage 20: 1609–1624.
|
| [40] | Hauk O, Pulvermuller F (2004) Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 1090–1103.
|
| [41] | Dien J (2009) The neurocognitive basis of reading single words as seen through early latency ERPs: a model of converging pathways. Biol Psychol 80: 10–22.
|
| [42] | Fuggetta G, Rizzo S, Pobric G, Lavidor M, Walsh V (2009) Functional representation of living and nonliving domains across the cerebral hemispheres: a combined event-related potential/transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cognitive Neurosci 21: 403–414.
|
| [43] | Schendan HE, Ganis G, Kutas M (1998) Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology 35: 240–251.
|
| [44] | Annett M (1970) A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Brit J Psychol 61: 303–321.
|
| [45] | Dragovic M, Hammond G (2007) A classification of handedness using the Annett Hand Preference Questionnaire. Brit J Psychol 98: 375–387.
|
| [46] | Dane A, Dane S (2004) Correlations among handedness, eyedness, monocular shifts from binocular focal point, and nonverbal intelligence in university mathematics students. Percept Motor Skill 99: 519–524.
|
| [47] | Porac C, Coren S (1976) The dominant eye. Psychol Bull 83: 880–897.
|
| [48] | Baayen RH, Piepenbrock R, Gulikers L (1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
|
| [49] | Drasdo N (1977) The neural representation of visual space. Nature 266: 554–556.
|
| [50] | Liversedge SP, White SJ, Rayner K (2006) Binocular co-ordination of eye movements during reading. Vision Res 46: 2363–2374.
|
| [51] | Paterson KB, Jordan TR, Kurtev S (2009) Binocular fixation disparity in single word displays. J Exp Psychol Human 35: 1961–1968.
|
| [52] | Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Kurtev S, Xu M (2010) Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: Effects of word length during monocular viewing. Cortex 46: 100–105.
|
| [53] | Saron CD, Davidson RJ (1989) Visual evoked potential measures of interhemispheric transfer time in humans. Behav Neurosci 103: 1115–1138.
|
| [54] | Binder JR, McKiernan KA, Parsons ME, Westbury CF, Possing ET, et al. (2003) Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition. J Cognitive Neurosci 15: 372–393.
|
| [55] | Grossberg S (1987) Competitive learning: From interactive activation to adaptive resonance. Cognitive Sci 11: 23–63.
|
| [56] | Friedrich CK, Kotz S, Friederici AD (2004) ERPs reflect lexical identification in word fragment priming. J Cognitive Neurosci 16: 541–52.
|
| [57] | Pyllk？nen L, Stringfellow A, Marantz A (2002) Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: An MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density. Brain Lang 81: 666–78.
|
| [58] | Grainger J, Holcomb PJ (2009) Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Lang Linguist Compass 3: 128–156.
|
| [59] | Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124: 372–422.
|
| [60] | Davis CJ, Perea M, Acha J (2009) Re(de)fining the orthographic neighbourhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbours in lexical decision and reading. J Exp Psychol Human 35: 1550–1570.
|
| [61] | Johnson RL, Perea M, Rayner K (2007) Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. J Exp Psychol Human 33: 209–229.
|
| [62] | Perea M, Pollatsek A (1998) The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. J Exp Psychol Human 24: 767–777.
|
| [63] | Brysbaert M (1994) Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli. Behav Brain Res 64: 151–161.
|
| [64] | Brysbaert M (2004) The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: a factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception. Brain Lang 88: 259–267.
|
| [65] | Hunter ZR, Brysbaert M, Knecht S (2007) Foveal word reading requires interhemispheric communication. J Cognitive Neurosci 19: 1373–1387.
|
| [66] | Lavidor M, Ellis AW, Shillcock R, Bland T (2001) Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of word length. Cogn Brain Res 12: 265–272.
|
| [67] | Van der Haegen L, Brysbaert M, Davis CJ (2009) How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory. Brain Lang 108: 112–121.
|
| [68] | Whitney C (2001) How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychon B Rev 8: 221–243.
|
| [69] | Whitney C, Lavidor M (2004) Why word length only matters in the left visual field. Neuropsychologia 42: 1680–1688.
|
| [70] | Almabruk AAA, Paterson KB, McGowan VA, Jordan TR (2010) Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: The evidence from Arabic. PLoS ONE. in press.
|
| [71] | Jordan TR, Almabruk AAA, McGowan VA, Paterson KB (2011) Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: The evidence from Arabic. Cortex. in press.
|
