全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS Medicine  2008 

Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

References

[1]  Thaler RH (1988) Anomalies: The winner's curse. J Econ Perspect 2: 191–202.
[2]  Cox JC, Isaac RM (1984) In search of the winner's curse. Econ Inq 22: 579–592.
[3]  Dyer D, Kagel JH (1996) Bidding in common value auctions: How the commercial construction industry corrects for the winner's curse. Manage Sci 42: 1463–1475.
[4]  Harrison GW, List JA (2007) Naturally occurring markets and exogenous laboratory experiments: A case study of the winner's curse. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research. pp. 1–20. NBER Working Paper No. 13072.
[5]  Capen EC, Clapp RV, Campbell WM (1971) Competitive bidding in high-risk situations. J Petrol Technol 23: 641–653.
[6]  Cassing J, Douglas RW (1980) Implications of the auction mechanism in baseball's free-agent draft. South Econ J 47: 110–121.
[7]  Dessauer JP (1981) Book publishing: What it is, what it does. 2nd edition. New York: R. R. Bowker.
[8]  Hendricks K, Porter RH, Boudreau B (1987) Information, returns, and bidding behavior in OCS auctions: 1954–1969. J Ind Econ 35: 517–542.
[9]  Ioannidis JPA (2005) Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. J Am Med Assoc 294: 218–228.
[10]  Krzyzanowska MK, Pintilie M, Tannock IF (2003) Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. J Am Med Assoc 290: 495–501.
[11]  Stern JM (2006) Publication bias: Evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. Br Med J 315: 640–645.
[12]  Goodman SN (2008) Systematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefit. J Clin Epidemiol 61: 95–96.
[13]  Bassler D, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Briel M, Cook DJ, Devereaux PJ, et al. (2007) Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit. J Clin Epidemiol 60: 869–873.
[14]  Ioannidis JP (2008) Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology 19: 640–648.
[15]  Kavvoura FK, Liberopoulos G, Ioannidis JPA (2007) Selection in reported epidemiological risks: An empirical assessment. PLoS Med 4: e79. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040079.
[16]  Kyzas PA, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP (2007) Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results. Eur J Cancer 43: 2559–2579.
[17]  Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R (2008) Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Eng J Med 358: 252–260.
[18]  Ioannidis JPA, Trikalinos TA (2005) Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 58: 543–549.
[19]  Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2: e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
[20]  Easterbrook P, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR (1991) Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337: 867–872.
[21]  Ioannidis JP (2006) Evolution and translation of research findings: From bench to where. PLoS Clin Trials 1: e36. doi:10.1371/journal.pctr.0010036.
[22]  Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Ntzani E, Ioannidis JP (2003) Translation of highly promising basic science research into clinical applications. Am J Med 114: 477–484.
[23]  National Human Genome Research Institute (2008) The Cancer Genome Atlas. Available: http://www.genome.gov/17516564. Accessed 4 September 2008.
[24]  Frank RH, Cook PJ (1995) The winner-take-all society. New York: Free Press.
[25]  Goodman SN, Altman DG, George SL (1998) Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals: Caveat lector. J Gen Intern Med 13: 753–756.
[26]  Biomed Central (2008) Most viewed articles in past year. Available: http://www.biomedcentral.com/mostviewedb?yyear/. Accessed 4 September 2008.
[27]  The PLoS Medicine Editors (2006) The impact factor game. PLoS Med 3: e291. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
[28]  Smith R (2006) Commentary: The power of the unrelenting impact factor—Is it a force for good or harm. Int J Epidemiol 35: 1129–1130.
[29]  Andersen J, Belmont J, Cho CT (2006) Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 39: 436–443.
[30]  Ha TC, Tan SB, Soo KC (2006) The journal impact factor: Too much of an impact. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35: 911–916.
[31]  Song F, Eastwood A, Bilbody S, Duley L (1999) The role of electronic journals in reducing publication bias. Med Inform 24: 223–229.
[32]  Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill E (2007) Show me the data. J Exp Med 204: 3052–3053.
[33]  Chew M, Villanueva EV, van der Weyden MB (2007) Life and times of the impact factor: Retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994–2005) and their editors' views. J Royal Soc Med 100: 142–150.
[34]  Ronco C (2006) Scientific journals: Who impacts the impact factor. Int J Artif Organs 29: 645–648.
[35]  Ioannidis JPA (2006) Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: analysis of journal ecosystems. PLoS ONE 1: e5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000005.
[36]  Pan Z, Trikalinos TA, Kavvoura FK, Lau J, Ioannidis JP (2005) Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: An empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature. PLoS Med 2: e334. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020334.
[37]  Ireland NJ (1994) On limiting the market for status signals. J Public Econ 53: 91–110.
[38]  Becker GS (1991) A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. Polit Econ 99: 1109–1116.
[39]  Dasgupta P, David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res Pol 23: 487–521.
[40]  Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J Econ Perspect 12: 151–170.
[41]  Hirshleifer D, Teoh SH (2003) Herd behaviour and cascading in capital markets: A review and synthesis. Eur Financ Manage 9: 25–66.
[42]  Rzhetsky A, Lossifov I, Loh JM, White KP (2007) Microparadigms: Chains of collective reasoning in publications about molecular interactions. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 103: 4940–4945.
[43]  Nature (2008) Getting published in Nature: The editorial process. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/get?_published/index.html. Accessed 4 September 2008.
[44]  Science (2008) About Science and AAAS. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/help/about/abo?ut.dtl. Accessed 4 September 2008.
[45]  Merton RK (1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Am Sociol Rev 22: 635–659.
[46]  Olson CM, Rennie D, Cook D, Dickersin K, Flanagin A (2002) Publication bias in editorial decision making. J Am Med Assoc 287: 2825–2828.
[47]  Brown A, Kraft D, Schmitz SM, Sharpless V, Martin C (2006) Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4: 1445–1451.
[48]  Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JPA (2006) Origin and funding of the most equently cited papers in medicine: Database analysis. Br Med J 332: 1061–1064.
[49]  Bubela TM, Caulfield TA (2004) Do the print media “hype” genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers. Canad Med Assoc J 170: 1399–1407.
[50]  Polanyi M (1964) Science, faith and society. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[51]  Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr (1987) Publication bias and clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 8: 343–353.
[52]  Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C, Young G (1998) Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. J Am Med Assoc 280: 254–257.
[53]  Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58: 697–720.
[54]  Ioannidis JPA (2006) Journals should publish all “null” results and should sparingly publish “positive” results. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15: 185.
[55]  Popper K (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133