Background The relationship between population trends in delaying childbirth and rising rates of primary cesarean delivery is unclear. The aims of the present study were (1) to characterize the association between maternal age and the outcome of labor, (2) to determine the proportion of the increase in primary cesarean rates that could be attributed to changes in maternal age distribution, and (3) to determine whether the contractility of uterine smooth muscle (myometrium) varied with maternal age. Methods and Findings We utilized nationally collected data from Scotland, from 1980 to 2005, and modeled the risk of emergency cesarean section among women delivering a liveborn infant in a cephalic presentation at term. We also studied isolated myometrial strips obtained from 62 women attending for planned cesarean delivery in Cambridge, England, from 2005 to 2007. Among 583,843 eligible nulliparous women, there was a linear increase in the log odds of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age from 16 y upwards, and this increase was unaffected by adjustment for a range of maternal characteristics (adjusted odds ratio for a 5-y increase 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48–1.51). Increasing maternal age was also associated with a longer duration of labor (0.49 h longer for a 5-y increase in age, 95% CI 0.46–0.51) and an increased risk of operative vaginal birth (adjusted odds ratio for a 5-y increase 1.49, 95% CI 1.48–1.50). Over the period from 1980 to 2005, the cesarean delivery rate among nulliparous women more than doubled and the proportion of women aged 30–34 y increased 3-fold, the proportion aged 35–39 y increased 7-fold, and the proportion aged ≥40 y increased 10-fold. Modeling indicated that if the age distribution had stayed the same over the period of study, 38% of the additional cesarean deliveries would have been avoided. Similar associations were observed in multiparous women. When studied in vitro, increasing maternal age was associated with reduced spontaneous activity and increased likelihood of multiphasic spontaneous myometrial contractions. Conclusions Delaying childbirth has significantly contributed to rising rates of intrapartum primary cesarean delivery. The association between increasing maternal age and the risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery is likely to have a biological basis.
References
[1]
Ecker JL, Frigoletto FD Jr. (2007) Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus. N Engl J Med 356: 885–888.
[2]
Guihard P, Blondel B (2001) Trends in risk factors for caesarean sections in France between 1981 and 1995: lessons for reducing the rates in the future. BJOG 108: 48–55.
[3]
Joseph KS, Young DC, Dodds L, O'Connell CM, Allen VM, et al. (2003) Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 102: 791–800.
[4]
Lee SI, Khang YH, Yun S, Jo MW (2005) Rising rates, changing relationships: caesarean section and its correlates in South Korea, 1988–2000. BJOG 112: 810–819.
[5]
Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH (2005) The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG 112: 205–209.
[6]
Main DM, Main EK, Moore DH (2000) The relationship between maternal age and uterine dysfunction: a continuous effect throughout reproductive life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182: 1312–1320.
[7]
Adashek JA, Peaceman AM, Lopez-Zeno JA, Minogue JP, Socol ML (1993) Factors contributing to the increased cesarean birth rate in older parturient women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169: 936–940.
[8]
Gareen IF, Morgenstern H, Greenland S, Gifford DS (2003) Explaining the association of maternal age with Cesarean delivery for nulliparous and parous women. J Clin Epidemiol 56: 1100–1110.
[9]
Bell JS, Campbell DM, Graham WJ, Penney GC, Ryan M, et al. (2001) Do obstetric complications explain high caesarean section rates among women over 30? A retrospective analysis. BMJ 322: 894–895.
[10]
O'Leary CM, de Klerk N, Keogh J, Pennell C, de Groot J, et al. (2007) Trends in mode of delivery during 1984–2003: can they be explained by pregnancy and delivery complications. BJOG 114: 855–864.
[11]
Parrish KM, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Connell FA, LoGerfo JP (1994) Effects of changes in maternal age, parity and birth weight distribution on primary Cesarean section rates. JAMA 271: 443–447.
[12]
Declercq E, Menacker F, Macdorman M (2006) Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991–2002. Am J Public Health 96: 867–872.
[13]
Cole S (1980) Scottish maternity and neonatal records. 8th Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. pp. 39–52.
[14]
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[15]
Smith GCS, Wood AM, Pell JP, White IR, Crossley JA, et al. (2004) Second-trimester maternal serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein and the subsequent risk of sudden infant death syndrome. N Engl J Med 351: 978–986.
[16]
Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES (2001) Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185: 883–887.
[17]
Macara LM, Murphy KW (1994) The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171: 71–77.
[18]
Ferreira CJ, Odendaal HJ (1994) Does coupling of uterine contractions reflect uterine dysfunction. S Afr Med J 84: 20–23.
[19]
Hertelendy F, Zakar T (2004) Regulation of myometrial smooth muscle functions. Curr Pharm Des 10: 2499–2517.
