Un Modelo Lógico-Formal para el Estudio de los Argumentos Emocionales en los Procesos de Construcción de Acuerdos

arguments are part of a communicative process through which people try to influence the actions of others. gilbert (1994) identifies four modes of argumentation: (a) logical, (b) emotional, (c) visceral, and (d) kisceral. following the line of research in computational psychology proposed by ortony, clore and collins (1988), and the model of conflict resolution using argumentation-based negotiations proposed by jung and tambe (2001), this paper presents a logical-formal model for studying of emotional arguments within the context of consensus building framed in negotiation and coordination processes.