Background Measuring the impact of capacity strengthening support is a priority for the international development community. Several frameworks exist for monitoring and evaluating funding results and modalities. Based on its long history of support, we report on the impact of individual and institutional capacity strengthening programmes conducted by the UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) and on the factors that influenced the outcome of its Research Capacity Strengthening (RCS) activities. Methodology and Principal Findings A mix of qualitative and quantitative methods (questionnaires and in-depth interviews) was applied to a selected group of 128 individual and 20 institutional capacity development grant recipients that completed their training/projects between 2000 and 2008. A semi-structured interview was also conducted on site with scientists from four institutions. Most of the grantees, both individual and institutional, reported beneficial results from the grant. However, glaring inequities stemming from gender imbalances and a language bias towards English were identified. The study showed that skills improvement through training contributed to better formulation of research proposals, but not necessarily to improved project implementation or communication of results. Appreciation of the institutional grants' impact varied among recipient countries. The least developed countries saw the programmes as essential for supporting basic infrastructure and activities. Advanced developing countries perceived the research grants as complementary to available resources, and particularly suitable for junior researchers who were not yet able to compete for major international grants. Conclusion The study highlights the need for a more equitable process to improve the effectiveness of health research capacity strengthening activities. Support should be tailored to the existing research capacity in disease endemic countries and should focus on strengthening national health research systems, particularly in the least developing countries. The engagement of stakeholders at country level would facilitate the design of more specific and comprehensive strategies based on local needs.
References
[1]
Lansang MA, Dennis R (2004) Building capacity in health research in the developing world. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 82: 764–770.
[2]
Nuyens I (2005) No Development without research. Global Forum for Health Research. Helping correct the 10/90 gap. Available: www.globalforumhealth.org.
[3]
UNDP (1998) Capacity assessment and development in a system and strategic management. Bureau for Development Policy, UNDP, New York, Technical Advisory panel N0 3.
[4]
Gadsby EW (2011) Research capacity strengthening: donor approaches to improving and assessing its impact in low and middle-income countries. Int J Health Plann Mgmt 26: 89–106. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1031
[5]
Kilama WL (2009) The 10/90 gap in sub Saharan Africa: resolving inequities in health research. Acta Tropica 112: S8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.08.015
[6]
Cooke J (2005) A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Family Practice 6: 44–55. Available: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296-6-44.
[7]
Bates I, Akoto AYO, Ansong D, Karikari P, Bedu-Addo G, et al. (2006) Evaluating health research capacity building: an evidence-based tool. PLoS Medicine 3(8): e299. DOI:10.1371/journal/pmed.0030299.
[8]
Jones N, Bailey M, Lytik？unen M (2007) Research capacity in Africa: ends, gaps and opportunity. Overseas Development Institute, London.
[9]
ESSENCE (2011) Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation. Framework for capacity strengthening in health research. ESSENCE Good practice document series. Available://apps.who.int/tdr/svc/publications/non-？tdr-publications/essence-framework.
[10]
Nuyens I (2007) 10 best resources for…health research capacity strengthening. Health Policy and Planning 22: 274–276. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm019
[11]
TDR (2008) Our 30 year history: 30 years of research and capacity building in tropical diseases. Available: http://apps.who.int/tdr/svc/publications？/about-tdr/30-year-history.
[12]
Ghaffar A, IJsselmuiden C, Zicker F (2005) Changing mindsets. Research capacity strengthening in low and middle income countries. Online://apps.who.int/tdr/svc/publications/tdr-？research-publications/changing_mindsets).
[13]
Vlassoff C, Manderson L (1994) Evaluating agency initiatives: building social science capability in tropical disease research. Acta Tropica 57: 103–22. doi: 10.1016/0001-706X(94)90002-7
[14]
Sonnert G (1996) Who succeeds in Science? The gender dimension. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
[15]
Baker D (2002) Where is gender and equity in science education? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(8): 659–663. doi: 10.1002/tea.10044
[16]
Alger J, Gomez L, Jamarillo A, Saravia NG, Cuervo LG, et al. (2010) Reunion de la red inter-regional de centros de referencia para capacitacion en cursos de la planeacion y evaluacion effectivas de proyectos de investigagion para la salud, Cali, Colombia, Abril 2010. Rev Med Hondur 78: 96–99.
[17]
Siegfried N, Bussgeeth K, Certain E (2006) Scope and geographical distribution of African medical journals active in 2005. S Afr Med J 96(6): 533–538.
[18]
Gilson L, Raphaely N (2008) The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle countries: a review of published literature 1994–2007. Health Policy and Planning 23: 294–307. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn019
[19]
IJsselmuiden C, Matlin S (2006) Why health research? Research for health: policy briefings. Council on health research for Development and Global Forum for Health Research.Available: www.gohre.org or www.globalforumhealth.org.
[20]
Pittman P, Almeida C (2006) Cross sector learning among research and policy makers: the search of new strategies to enable the use of research results. Cad Saude Publica 22: S97–108. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2006001300019
