全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Does Sex Speed Up Evolutionary Rate and Increase Biodiversity?

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002414

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Most empirical and theoretical studies have shown that sex increases the rate of evolution, although evidence of sex constraining genomic and epigenetic variation and slowing down evolution also exists. Faster rates with sex have been attributed to new gene combinations, removal of deleterious mutations, and adaptation to heterogeneous environments. Slower rates with sex have been attributed to removal of major genetic rearrangements, the cost of finding a mate, vulnerability to predation, and exposure to sexually transmitted diseases. Whether sex speeds or slows evolution, the connection between reproductive mode, the evolutionary rate, and species diversity remains largely unexplored. Here we present a spatially explicit model of ecological and evolutionary dynamics based on DNA sequence change to study the connection between mutation, speciation, and the resulting biodiversity in sexual and asexual populations. We show that faster speciation can decrease the abundance of newly formed species and thus decrease long-term biodiversity. In this way, sex can reduce diversity relative to asexual populations, because it leads to a higher rate of production of new species, but with lower abundances. Our results show that reproductive mode and the mechanisms underlying it can alter the link between mutation, evolutionary rate, speciation and biodiversity and we suggest that a high rate of evolution may not be required to yield high biodiversity.

References

[1]  Williams GC (1975) Sex and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 210 p.
[2]  Maynard Smith J (1978) The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 236 p.
[3]  Bell G (1982) The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. California: University of California Press. 635 p.
[4]  Misevic D, Kouyos RD, Bonhoeffer S (2009) Predicting the evolution of sex on complex fitness landscapes. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000510.
[5]  Mayr E (1970) Populations, Species and Evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 472 p.
[6]  Orr HA (1995) The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid in- compatibilities. Genetics 139: 1805–1813.
[7]  Coyne JA, Orr A (1998) The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos T Roy Soc B 353: 287–305.
[8]  Barraclough TG, Birky CJW, Burt A (2003) Diversification in sexual and asexual organisms. Evolution 57: 2166–2172.
[9]  Hillis DM (2007) Asexual evolution: Can species exist without sex? Curr Biol 17: R543–R544.
[10]  Fraser C, Hanage WP, Spratt BG (2007) Recombination and the nature of bacterial speciation. Science 315: 476–480.
[11]  Fontaneto D, Herniou EA, Boschetti C, Caprioli M, Melone G, et al. (2007) Inde- pendently evolving species in asexual bdelloid rotifers. PLoS Biol 5: e87.
[12]  Otto S (2009) The evolutionary enigma of sex. Am Nat 174: S1–S14.
[13]  Rainey PB, Travisano M (1998) Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394: 69–72.
[14]  Schluter D (2009) Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323: 737–741.
[15]  Butlin R, Bridle J, Schluter D (2009) Speciation and Patterns of Diversity. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press. 346 p.
[16]  Gavrilets S, Losos JB (2009) Adaptive radiation: Contrasting theory with data. Science 323: 732–737.
[17]  Butlin R, Debelle A, Kerth C, Snook RR, et al. The Marie Curie SPECIATION Network (2011) What do we need to know about speciation? Trends Ecol Evol 27: 27–39.
[18]  Kimura M, Ohta T (1971) Theoretical Aspects of Population Genetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 232 p.
[19]  Kirkpatrick M, Jenkins CD (1989) Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature 339: 300–301.
[20]  Rice WR, Chippindale AK (2001) Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection. Science 294: 555–559.
[21]  Butlin R (2002) The cost and benefits of sex: new insights from old asexual lineages. Nat Rev Genet 3: 311–317.
[22]  Poon A, Chao L (2004) Drift increases the advantage of sex in RNA bacteriophage Phi 6. Genetics 166: 19–24.
[23]  Goddard MR, Godfray HCJ, Burt A (2005) Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature 434: 636–640.
[24]  Livnat A, Papadimitriou C, Dushoff J, Feldman MW (2008) A mixability theory for the role of sex in evolution. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 19803–19808.
[25]  Kondrashov FA, Kondrashov AS (2001) Multidimensional epistasis and the disad- vantage of sex. P Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 12089–12092.
[26]  Futuyma DJ (2010) Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution 64: 1865–1884.
[27]  Gorelick R, Heng HHQ (2011) Sex reduces genetic variation: A multidisciplinary review. Evolution 65: 1088–1098.
[28]  Higgs PG, Derrida B (1992) Genetic distance and species formation in evolving populations. J Mol Evol 35: 454–465.
[29]  Manzo F, Peliti L (1994) Geographic speciation in the Higgs-Derrida model of species formation. J Phys A-Math Gen 27: 7079–7086.
[30]  Hoelzer GA, Drewes R, Meier J, Doursat R (2008) Isolation-by-distance and out- breeding depression are sufficient to drive parapatric speciation in the absence of environmental fluctuations. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000126.
[31]  de Aguiar MAM, Baranger M, Baptestini EM, Kaufman L, Bar-Yam Y (2009) Global patterns of speciation and diversity. Nature 460: 384–387.
[32]  Melían CJ, Alonso D, Vázquez DP, Regetz J, Allesina S (2010) Frequency-dependent selection predicts patterns of radiations and biodiversity. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000892.
[33]  Hubbell SP (2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 448 p.
[34]  Chave J, Muller-Landau HC, Levin SA (2002) Comparing classical community mod- els: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. Am Nat 159: 1–23.
[35]  Allen AP, Savage VM (2007) Setting the absolute tempo of biodiversity dynamics. Ecol Lett 10: 637–646.
[36]  Etienne RS, Apol MEF, Olff H, Weissing FJ (2007) Modes of speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity. Oikos 116: 241–258.
[37]  Mouillot D, Gaston KJ (2007) Geographic range size heritability: what do neutral models with different modes of speciation predict? Global Ecol Biogeogr 16: 367–380.
[38]  Leigh EG (2007) Neutral theory: a historical perspective. J Evolution Biol 20: 2075–2091.
[39]  Haegeman B, Etienne RS (2009) Neutral models with generalized speciation. B Math Biol 71: 1507–1519.
[40]  Beeravolu CR, Couteron P, Pélissier R, Munoz F (2009) Studying ecological com- munities from a neutral standpoint: A review of models' structure and parameter estimation. Ecol Model 220: 2603–2610.
[41]  Rosindell J, Cornell SJ, Hubbell SP, Etienne RS (2010) Protracted speciation revi- talizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 13: 716–727.
[42]  O'Dwyer JP, Green JL (2010) Field theory for biogeography: a spatially explicit model for predicting patterns of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 13: 87–95.
[43]  Etienne RS, Haegeman B (2011) The neutral theory of biodiversity with random fission speciation. Theor Ecol 4: 87–109.
[44]  Etienne RS, Rosindell J (2011) Prolonging the past counteracts the pull of the present: protracted speciation can explain observed slowdowns in diversification. Syst Biol. In press.
[45]  Wiens JJ (2004) What is speciation and how should we study it? Am Nat 163: 914–923.
[46]  Rousset F (2004) Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 288 p.
[47]  Mallet J (2008) A species definition for the Modern Synthesis. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 294–299.
[48]  Wagner A (2008) Neutralism and selectionism: a network-based reconciliation. Nat Rev Genet 9: 965–974.
[49]  Bateson W (1909) Heredity and variation in modern lights. In: Seward AC, editor. Darwin and Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 85–101.
[50]  Dobzhansky T (1936) Studies on hybrid sterility. ii. localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21: 113–135.
[51]  Muller HJ (1942) Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol Symp 6: 71–125.
[52]  Coyne JA (1992) Genetics and speciation. Nature 355: 511–515.
[53]  Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Massachusetts: Sinauer, Sunderland. 545 p.
[54]  Welch JJ (2004) Accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities: Reconciling theory and data. Evolution 58: 1145–1156.
[55]  Kirkpatrick M, Ravigńe V (2002) Speciation by natural and sexual selection: mod- els and experiments. Am Nat 159: S22–S35.
[56]  Moritz C, Schneider CJ (1992) Evolutionary relationships within the ensatina es- chscholtzii complex confirm the ring species interpretation. Syst Biol 41: 273–291.
[57]  Gavrilets S (2004) Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton: Prince- ton University Press. 432 p.
[58]  Goldschmidt RB (1949) The intersexual males of the beaded minute combination in drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 35: 314–316.
[59]  Hubbell SP, Lake J (2003) The Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, and Beyond. In: Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, editors. Macroecology: patterns and processes. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 45–63.
[60]  Colegrave N (2002) Sex releases the speed limit on evolution. Nature 420: 664–666.
[61]  Arjan J, de Visser GM, Elena SF (2007) The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift. Nat Rev Genet 8: 139–149.
[62]  Heubel KU, Rankin DJ, Kokko H (2009) How to go extinct by mating too much: Population consequences of male mate choice and efficiency in a sexual-asexual species complex. Oikos 118: 513–520.
[63]  Bell G (2010) Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments. Philos T Roy Soc B 365: 87–97.
[64]  Oren A (2004) Prokaryote diversity and taxonomy: Current status and future chal- lenges. Philos T Roy Soc B 359: 623–638.
[65]  Fraser C, Alm EJ, Polz MF, Spratt BG, Hanage WP (2009) The bacterial species challenge: making sense of genetic and ecological diversity. Science 323: 741–746.
[66]  Malecot G (1970) The Mathematics of Heredity. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. 92 p.
[67]  Rosindell J, Wong Y, Etienne RS (2008) Coalescence methods for spatial neutral ecology. Ecol Inform 3: 259–271.
[68]  Lynch FAGM (2000) The origins of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am Nat 156: 590–605.
[69]  Lynch M (2007) The Origins of Genome Architecture. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates. 340 p.
[70]  Ma J, Ratan A, Raney BJ, Suh BB, Miller W, et al. (2008) The infinite sites model of genome evolution. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 14254–14261.
[71]  Bikard D, Patel D, Le Mette C, Giorgi V, Camilleri C, et al. (2009) Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 323: 623–626.
[72]  Goldberg EE, Kohn JR, Lande R, Robertson KA, Smith SA, et al. (2010) Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science 330: 493–495.
[73]  Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN, editor. Mammalian Protein Metabolism. New York: Academic Press. pp. 21–132.
[74]  Kimura M (1983) The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press. 384 p.
[75]  Durrett R (2008) Probability Models for DNA Sequence Evolution. New York: Springer. 432 p.
[76]  Derrida B, Peliti L (1991) Evolution in a flat fitness landscape. B Math Biol 53: 355–382.
[77]  Serva M, Peliti L (1991) A statistical model of an evolving population with sexual reproduction. J Phys A-Math Gen 24: L705–L709.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133