All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2012 

Ureteral Stent Retrieval Using the Crochet Hook Technique in Females

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029292

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Introduction We developed a method for ureteral stent removal in female patients that requires no cystoscopy or fluoroscopic guidance using a crochet hook. In addition, we also investigated the success rate, complications and pain associated with this procedure. Methods A total of 40 female patients (56 stents) underwent the removal of ureteral stents. All procedures were carried out with the patients either under anesthesia, conscious sedation, or analgesic suppositories as deemed appropriate for each procedure including Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL), Ureteroscopy (URS), Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and ureteral stent removal. At the time of these procedures, fluoroscopy and/or cystoscopy were prepared, but they were not used unless we failed to successfully remove the ureteral stent using the crochet hook. In addition, matched controls (comprising 50 stents) which were removed by standard ureteral stent removal using cystoscopy were used for comparison purposes. Results A total of 47 of the 56 stents (83.9%) were successfully removed. In addition, 47 of 52 (90.4%) were successfully removed except for two migrated stents and two heavily encrusted stents which could not be removed using cystoscopy. Ureteral stent removal using the crochet hook technique was unsuccessful in nine patients, including two encrustations and two migrations. Concerning pain, ureteral stent removal using the crochet hook technique showed a lower visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) score than for the standard technique using cystoscopy. Conclusions Ureteral stent removal using a crochet hook is considered to be easy, safe, and cost effective. This technique is also easy to learn and is therefore considered to be suitable for use on an outpatient basis.


[1]  Bultitude MF, Tiptaft RC, Glass JM, Dasgupta P (2003) Management of encrusted ureteral stents impacted in upper tract. Urology 62: 622–626.
[2]  Borboroglu PG, Kane CJ (2000) Current management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with a large associated stone burden. The Journal of urology 164: 648–650.
[3]  Mohan-Pillai K, Keeley FX Jr, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA (1999) Endourological management of severely encrusted ureteral stents. Journal of endourology/Endourological Society 13: 377–379.
[4]  Schulze KA, Wettlaufer JN, Oldani G (1985) Encrustation and stone formation: complication of indwelling ureteral stents. Urology 25: 616–619.
[5]  el-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, et al. (1991) Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. The Journal of urology 146: 1487–1491.
[6]  Bukkapatnam R, Seigne J, Helal M (2003) 1-step removal of encrusted retained ureteral stents. The Journal of urology 170: 1111–1114.
[7]  Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Aron M, Seth A, et al. (2001) Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors. Urology 58: 526–531.
[8]  Somers WJ (1996) Management of forgotten or retained indwelling ureteral stents. Urology 47: 431–435.
[9]  Xu C, Tang H, Gao X, Yang B, Sun Y (2009) Management of forgotten ureteral stents with holmium laser. Lasers in medical science 24: 140–143.
[10]  Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Yoshida M, Matsuzaki J (2011) Ureteral Stent Encrustation, Incrustation, and Coloring: Morbidity Related to Indwelling Times. J Endourol.
[11]  Chang RS, Liang HL, Huang JS, Wang PC, Chen MC, et al. (2008) Fluoroscopic guidance of retrograde exchange of ureteral stents in women. AJR American journal of roentgenology 190: 1665–1670.
[12]  Kim BM, Park SI (2008) Placement of double-J ureteric stent using the pull-through technique in patients with tight ureteric stenosis. Abdominal imaging 33: 237–240.
[13]  Ozkan O, Akinci D, Bozlar U, Ustunsoz B, Ozmen M, et al. (2009) Retrograde ureteral stent exchange under fluoroscopic guidance. Diagnostic and interventional radiology 15: 51–56.
[14]  Park SW, Cha IH, Hong SJ, Yi JG, Jeon HJ, et al. (2007) Fluoroscopy-guided transurethral removal and exchange of ureteral stents in female patients: technical notes. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 18: 251–256.
[15]  Ho CH, Huang KH, Chen SC, Pu YS, Liu SP, et al. (2009) Choosing the ideal length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent according to body height: study based on a Chinese population. Urologia internationalis 83: 70–74.
[16]  Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL (1967) Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. The Journal of urology 97: 840–844.
[17]  de Baere T, Denys A, Pappas P, Challier E, Roche A (1994) Ureteral stents: exchange under fluoroscopic control as an effective alternative to cystoscopy. Radiology 190: 887–889.
[18]  Taylor WN, McDougall IT (2002) Minimally invasive ureteral stent retrieval. The Journal of urology 168: 2020–2023.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal