All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

The Potential Impact of Incentives on Managed Lane Travel

DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2018.84014, PP. 255-272

Keywords: Managed Lanes, Incentives, Stated Preference Survey

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


The use of managed lanes to control and maximize freeway throughput is increasing. One way of encouraging more managed lane use is through the implementation of incentives. In the Dallas-Fort Worth area, a managed lane is being added to the I-30 (Tom Landry freeway) and incentives to maximize the use of this lane were planned. Since the managed lanes were not yet open and the incentives were hypothetical, a stated preference survey was used to gauge the potential impact of the incentives on traveler behavior. The stated preference questions were designed using Db-efficient and random adaptive designs. The incentives were chosen by looking at other programs around the country and through discussion with transportation experts. Once ready, the survey was administered online to travelers in the area and a total of 898 usable responses were gathered. From the responses, a mixed-logit model was developed to describe and predict traveler behavior. From the model, elasticities were calculated to predict the impact of the incentives on mode choice. The model found that incentives with discounts and free trips (a transit fare discount, express bus service to downtown, a free trip for every X number of paid trips, and a discount offered to select businesses) were more effective at encouraging managed lane use. The other incentives (gift card worth $5 for every X number of trips and $5 in credit for every X number of trips taken by transit) had less of an impact.


[1]  Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2013) Managed Lanes: A Primer.
[2]  Goodin, G., Benz, R., Burris, M., Brewer, M., Wood, N. and Geiselbrecht, T. (2013) Katy Freeway: An Evaluation of a Second-Generation Managed Lanes Project (No. FHWA/TX-13/0-6688-1).
[3]  Clean Air Campaign (2009) Commuter Rewards: Cash for Commuters.
[4]  Commuter Connections. Poll Rewards for Carpools.
[5]  Metro ExpressLanes (2014) How It Works.
[6]  Merugu, D., Prabhakar, B.S. and Rama, N. (2009) An Incentive Mechanism for Decongesting the Roads: A Pilot Program in Bangalore. Proceedings of ACM NetEcon Workshop, Standford, July 2009.
[7]  Leblanc, R. and Walker, J. L. (2013) Which Is the Biggest Carrot? Comparing Nontraditional Incentives for Demand Management. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington DC, 13-17 January 2013.
[8]  Zhang, Z., Fujii, H. and Managi, S. (2014) How Does Commuting Behavior Change Due to Incentives? An Empirical Study of the Beijing Subway System. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 17-26.
[9]  Bianco, M. (2000) Effective Transportation Demand Management: Combining Parking Pricing, Transit Incentives, and Transportation Management in a Commercial District of Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1711, 46-54.
[10]  Ettema, D., Knockaert, J. and Verhoef, E. (2010) Using Incentives as Traffic Management Tool: Empirical Results of the “Peak Avoidance” Experiment. Transportation Letters, 2, 39-51.
[11]  Ben-Elia, E. and Ettema, D. (2011) Rewarding Rush-Hour Avoidance: A Study of Commuters’ Travel Behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45, 567-582.
[12]  Bliemer, M.C., Dicke-Ogenia, M. and Ettema, D. (2009) Rewarding for Avoiding the Peak Period: A Synthesis of Three Studies in The Netherlands. 12th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Jaipur, 13-18 December 2009.
[13]  Georgia Department of Transportation (2009) Cash for Commuters: Survey Key Findings.
[14]  Dulles Greenway (2014) VIP Program Overview.
[15]  iCommute. Prize List.
[16]  Florida Department of Transportation. 595 Express Bus Overview.
[17]  Higueros, E. (2014) Metro ExpressLanes, Transit Rewards Program.
[18]  Prabhakar, B. (2014) Active Demand Management (Part 1). Active Transportation and Demand Management Webinar Series.
[19]  Rose, J.M., Bliemer, M.C., Hensher, D.A. and Collins, A.T. (2008) Designing Efficient Stated Choice Experiments in the Presence of Reference Alternatives. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42, 395-406.
[20]  Wood, N., Burris, M., Geiselbrecht, T., Bettger, N. and Lamers, D. (2017) Application of Traffic Thermostat for the I-30 Managed Lanes in Dallas, Texas. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2616, 104-113.
[21]  Harline, C. (2013) The Impact of Traffic Images on Mode Choice in Stated-Preference Surveys. Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station.
[22]  LBJ TEXpress. How Pricing Is Determined.
[23]  DART Fares.
[24]  Chum, G. and Burris, M. (2008) Potential Mode Shift from Transit to Single-Occupancy Vehicles on a High-Occupancy Toll Lane. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2072, 10-19.
[25]  Han, N. (2015) The Impact of Incentives on Managed Lane Travel. Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal