All Title Author
Keywords Abstract


How to Evaluate Interactions during a Debate of Ideas

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2017.84042, PP. 539-548

Keywords: Team Sport, Tactics, Debate of Ideas, Evaluation, Roadmap

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The idea of a debate of ideas is part of an innovative conception of the teaching/learning system at school, in which knowledge is developed with the help of peers and the teacher. The debate of ideas first appears as a situation of verbalization about action intended to make aware of the task to be carried out and the instructions that characterize it. To evaluate its effects, we will take data from the experimentation of Zerai (2009) and give us a triangulation between the result and the score of the encounters, quantitative data (balls played, balls conquered, etc.) and a qualitative data: the roadmap. We will try to test the contributions of peer interactions. The methodology used was to observe and retrieve data on a group of Tunisian second-year girls from Thala Secondary High School in a handball cycle. In this group of twenty girls, we organized four sub-groups to form the teams. The chosen triangulation allows an indirect measure of the effectiveness of the debate of ideas. The performance of the team (the ratio of shots to the number of goals) appears very quickly as a trigger for concertation between the players. The observation made collectively on the losses of the ball will also, very quickly generate reactions. The roadmap relies more on the planned strategy and the changes of roles within the team that it implies. In conclusion, comparing the selected indicators provides a realistic way of assessing the adequacy between interactions and progress in the game. This type of work emphasizes the time needed to succeed. One of the achievements of the research in didactics of collective sports at school is that the learning of a game can not be conceived without an important practice. For pupils, a real learning in collective sports games lies, in situations of problem gambling, to observe, to extract, to evaluate the information more and more relevant to reduce the time of analysis, and thus of decision to act on the opposition reports.

References

[1]  Berchebru, M. (2007). Didactics of the Teaching of Collective Sports. When the Use of Multimedia Technologies and Verbalization Improves the Teaching of Team Sports. Masters’ Dissertation, Besançon: University of Franche-Comté. (Unpublished)
[2]  Casetti, F., Lumbelli, L., & Wolf, M. (1981). Indagine su alcuneregole di genereteleviso. Ricerchesulla communicazione. Quaderni semestrali dell’Istituto A. Gemeli Franco Angeli n°3, Milan: Ikon, 11-122.
[3]  Chang, C. W. (2006). Towards a Constructivist Approach to Teaching Basketball in Taiwan. Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University. (Not published)
[4]  Conquet, P., & Devaluez, J. (1986) Design of Physical Education. In E.P.S Content and Didactics (pp. 91-103). Paris: SNEP.
[5]  Deleplace, R. (1979). Movement Rugby—Total Rugby. Paris: Physical Education and Sports.
[6]  Dugrand, M. (1985). Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Approaches to the Teaching of Football. The Example in Senegal. Thesis, Caen: University of Caen.
[7]  Fayol, M., & Monteil, J. M. (1994). Strategies for Learning/Earning Strategies. French Journal of Pedagogy, 106, 91-110.
[8]  Giordan, A. (Ed.) (1983). The Student and/or the Scientific Knowledge: Didactic Approach of the Construction of the Scientific Concepts by the Pupils. Bern: Peter Lang.
[9]  Gréhaigne, J. F. (Ed.) (2009). Around Time. Space, Learning, Projects in Team Sports. Besançon: Presses of the University of Franche-Comté.
[10]  Gréhaigne, J. F., Billard, M., & Laroche, J. Y. (1999). The Teaching of Collective Sports Games at School. Design, Construction, Evaluation. Brussels: De Boeck. (Sport Sci- ences and Practices Collection)
[11]  Gréhaigne, J. F., Caty, D., & Wallian, N. (2004). Authentic Evaluation and Balance of Power in Collective Sport. Measures and Evaluation in Education, 27, 25-39.
[12]  Gréhaigne, J. F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (1999). The Foundations of Tactics and Strategy in Team Sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18, 159-174.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.18.2.159
[13]  Gréhaigne, J. F., Wallian, N., & Godbout, P. (2005). Technological Approach and Didactic Modeling of Collective Sports at School. Impulse, 4, 59-79.
[14]  Jeu, B. (1977). Sport Emotion Space. Paris: Vigot.
[15]  Zerai, Z. (2006). How Do Girls Learn in Hand Ball? Contribution of Verbalization. Master’s Degree in Physical and Sports Activities, Tunis: ISEFC.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus