All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Learning as a Merged Phenomenon of the Learner and the Content to Be Learned

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2016.710143, PP. 1382-1391

Keywords: Non-Dualism, Variation Theory, Language Acquisition, Instruction, Learning

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


This paper aims to contribute to knowledge of education based on a non-dualistic perspective on learning, by considering how a variation theoretical perspective seeing learning as a merged phenomenon of the learner and the object to be learnt affects instruction. In this project, teachers’ theoretical non-dualistic awareness was developed through the introduction of variation theory as a guiding principle during a school-based research project. Based on a non-dualistic epistemological standpoint, the analysis focuses on the characteristics of instruction and learning from an assumption that the learner and the content learned cannot be separated. The data used for the analysis is from an example of instruction on learning to communicate in a foreign language. The analysis aimed to answer the questions: How do teachers orientate learners, carry out teaching and consolidate learners’ knowledge? And how does this non-dualistic standpoint affect assessment? The results show in what way teachers transform and enact the curriculum objectives in teaching activities based on the learners’ perspectives, which in turn describes how they change their way of assessing the students’ learning in line with the theoretical assumptions by testing context-situated video-recorded group assessment, which are individually analysed.


[1]  Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on Activity Theory. Educational Review, 61, 197-210.
[2]  Damasio, A. (2010). Descartes Error Revisited. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences: Basic and Clinical Perspectives, 10, 192-194.
[3]  Danisch, R. (2013). The Absence of Rhetorical Theory in Richard Rorty’s Linguistic Paradigm. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 46, 156-181.
[4]  de Waal, F. (2008). Putting the Altruism Back into Altruism: The Evolution of Empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279-300.
[5]  Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and Education. West Lafayette, Ind.: Kappa Delta Pi.
[6]  Dudley, P. (2012). Lesson Study Development in England: From School Networks to National Policy. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1, 85-100.
[7]  Hammond, M. (2013). The Contribution of Pragmatism to Understanding Educational Action Research: Value and Consequences. Educational Action Research, 21, 603-618.
[8]  Holmqvist, M. (2011). Teachers’ Learning in a Learning Study. Instructional Science, 39, 497-511.
[9]  Holmqvist, M., Holmquist, P.-O., & Cheung, W. M. (2010). The Same Lesson in Two Different Cultures—What Differs and What Is the Same? A Learning Study on Reading Comprehension in Sweden and Hong Kong. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 21, 71-82.
[10]  James, W. (1907/2014). Pragmatism. A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[11]  Krikeben, G. (2010). Descartes Embodies Psychology: Descartes or Damasios Error? Journal of the History of the Neurosciences: Basic and Clinical Perspectives, 10, 173-191.
[12]  Kullberg, A. (2010). What Is Taught and What Is Learned. Professional Insights Gained and Shared by Teachers of Mathematics. Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
[13]  Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How Should Research Contribute to Instructional Improvement? The Case of Lesson Study. Educational Researcher, 31, 3-14.
[14]  Ling, L. M., & Marton, F. (2012). Towards a Science of the Art of Teaching. Using Variation Theory as a Guiding Principle of Pedagogical Design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1, 7-22.
[15]  Lo, M. L. (2012). Variation Theory and the Improvement of Teaching and Learning. Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
[16]  Marton, F. (2014). Necessary Conditions of Learning. New York: Routledge.
[17]  Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[18]  Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2005). Learning Theory as Teaching Resource: Enhancing Students’ Understanding of Economic Concepts. Instructional Science, 33, 159-191.
[19]  Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). Classroom Discourse and the Space of Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[20]  McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research. New York: Routledge.
[21]  Morgan, D. (2014). Pragmatism as a Paradigm for Social Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 1045-1053.
[22]  National Agency of Education (2011).Skolverket: Laroplaner [National Agency of Education: Curriculum].

[23]  Pang, M. F., & Lo, M. L. (2011). Learning Study: Helping Teachers to Use Theory, Develop Professionally, and Produce New Knowledge to Be Shared. Instructional Science, 40, 589-606.
[24]  Pring, R. (2015). Philosophy of Educational Research. London: Bloomsbury.
[25]  Runesson, U., Kullberg, A., & Maunula, T. (2011). Sensitivity to Student Learning—A Possible Way of Learning to Enhance Learning? In O. Zaslawski, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Constructing Knowledge for Teaching Secondary Mathematics: Tasks to Enhance Prospective and Practicing Teacher Learning (pp. 263-278). New York: Springer.
[26]  Selin, P., & Holmqvist Olander, M. (2015). Transformning New Curriculum Objectives into Classroom Instruction with the Aid of Learning Studies. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4, 401-415.
[27]  Shawer, S. (2010). Communicative-Based Curriculum Innovations between Theory and Practice: Implications for EFL Curriculum Development and Student Cognitive and Affective Change. The Curriculum Journal, 21, 333-359.
[28]  Sundin, O., &. Johannisson, J. (2005). Pragmatism, Neo-Pragmatism and Sociocultural Theory: Communicative Participants as a Perspective in LIS. Journal of Documentation, 61, 23-43.
[29]  Wolf, M. K., Farnsworth, T., & Herman, J. (2008).Validity Issues in Assessing English Language Learners’ Language Proficiency. Educational Assessment, 13, 80-107.
[30]  Yin, R. (2014). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Los Angeles: SAGE.


comments powered by Disqus