特殊理论导向结构化团体咨询研究范式的建构
Constructing a Research Paradigm on Special Theoretical Orientation Structuring Group Counseling

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2016.61008, PP. 59-64

Keywords: 询证医学，特殊理论取向，结构化团体咨询，评估性研究，研究范式
Evidence-Based Medicine, Special Theoretical Orientation, Structuring Group Counseling, Evaluation Research, Research Paradigm

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

基于特殊理论导向的结构化团体咨询是将一些特殊的心理治疗的理论和方法用于结构化团体咨询中，以提升结构化团体咨询的干预效能。本文借鉴“询证医学”的核心思想，提出了运用该类团体咨询进行干预研究的研究范式，即集调查研究和干预研究、单纯定量研究与质性–量化研究相互渗透的“分叉研究”的复合研究范式，使基于特殊基于理论导向的结构化团体咨询的方案设计具有更加可靠的理论和实证依据，并提高评估性研究的信效度。
Special Theoretical Orientation Structuring Group Counseling is a kind of structuring Group Counseling designed based on some special psychological or therapeutic theories in order to im-prove its efficacy. A research paradigm on “Special Theoretical Orientation Structuring Group Counseling” is proposed in this article based on the Evidence-Based Medicine thought by integrat-ing the Investigation and Intervention Research and combining the Quantitative Research Qualita-tive Research. This paradigm is expected to support the design of group-counseling on the reliable basis of theory and research to improve the reliability and the validity of its evaluation research.

References

[1]	陈向明(2000). 质的研究方法与社会科学研究. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
[2]	樊富珉(2005). 团体心理咨询. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
[3]	贾烜, 樊富珉(2011). 内地与台湾团体心理咨询研究现状比较分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(2).
[4]	威廉？劳伦斯？纽曼(2007). 社会研究方法: 定性和定量的取向. 人民邮电出版社: 23-24, 560-561.
[5]	张红川, 王耘(2001). 论定量与定性研究的结合问题及其对我国心理学研究的启示. 北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 4.
[6]	张天嵩, 钟文昭(2014). 实用循证医学方法学(第二版). 中南大学出版社.
[7]	周海涛(译) (2009). 案例研究: 设计与方法. 18, 26-27, 44-45, 52, 162-165. (罗伯特？K？殷, 2009)
[8]	Bowen, K. A. (2001). The Sin of Omission Punishable by Death to Internal Validity: An Argument for Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods to Strengthen Internal Validity. Human Connect Education.
[9]	Gorczynski, P. (Ed.) (2014). Examining the Efficacy and Feasibility of Exercise Counseling in Individuals with Schizophrenia: A Single-Case Experimental Study. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 1-7.
[10]	Greaves, A. E. (Ed.) (2012). A Multiple Single Case Design Study of Group Therapeutic Puppetry with People with Severe Mental Illness. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 39, 251-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2012.03.002
[11]	Hanevik, H., & Hestad, K. A. (Eds.) (2013). Expressive art Therapy for Psychosis: A Multiple Case Study. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 40, 312-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2013.05.011
[12]	Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1984). Qualitative and Quantitative Me-thods When Stories Converge. In Mark & Shotland (Eds.), Multiple Methods in Program Evaluation: New Directions for Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
[13]	Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Ap-proach.
[14]	Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. New bury Park: Sage.
[15]	Tsang, E. W. K. (2014). Case Studies and Generalization in Information Systems Research: A Critical Realist Perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23, 174-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2013.09.002

Full-Text