All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2014 

Effectiveness of Family Planning Policies: The Abortion Paradox

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091539

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Objective The relation between levels of contraceptive use and the incidence of induced abortion remains a topic of heated debate. Many of the contradictions are likely due to the fact that abortion is the end point of a process that starts with sexual activity, contraceptive use (or non-use), followed by unwanted pregnancy, a decision to terminate, and access to abortion. Trends in abortion rates reflect changes in each step of this process, and opposing trends may cancel each other out. This paper aims to investigate the roles played by the dissemination of contraception and the evolving norms of motherhood on changes in abortion rates. Methods Drawing data from six national probability surveys that explored contraception and pregnancy wantedness in France from 1978 through 2010, we used multivariate linear regression to explore the associations between trends in contraceptive rates and trends in (i) abortion rates, (ii) unwanted pregnancy rates, (iii) and unwanted birth rates, and to determine which of these 3 associations was strongest. Findings The association between contraceptive rates and abortion rates over time was weaker than that between contraception rates and unwanted pregnancy rates (p = 0.003). Similarly, the association between contraceptive rates and unwanted birth rates over time was weaker than that between contraceptive rates and unwanted pregnancy rates (p = 0.000).

References

[1]  Marston C, Cleland J (2003) Relationships between contraception and abortion: a review of the evidence. International Family Planning Perspectives 29: 6–13. doi: 10.2307/3180995
[2]  Erfani A (2011) Induced abortion in Tehran, Iran: estimated rates and correlates. International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health 37: 134–142. doi: 10.1363/3713411
[3]  Serbanescu F, Stupp P, Westoff C (2010) Contraception matters: two approaches to analyzing evidence of the abortion decline in Georgia. International Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health 36: 99–110. doi: 10.1363/33609910
[4]  Bongaarts J, Westoff CF (2000) The potential role of contraception in reducing abortion. Studies in family Planning 31: 193–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2000.00193.x
[5]  David HP (1992) Abortion in Europe, 1920-91: a public health perspective. Studies in Family Planning 23: 1–22. doi: 10.2307/1966824
[6]  Due?as JL, Lete I, Bermejo R, Arbat A, Pérez-Campos E, et al. (2011) Trends in the use of contraceptive methods and voluntary interruption of pregnancy in the Spanish population during 1997–2007. Contraception 83: 82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.010
[7]  Bajos N, Guillaume A, Kontula O (2003) Reproductive health behaviour of young Europeans. Council of Europe.
[8]  Bajos N, Bozon M, Beltzer N, Laborde C, Andro A, et al. (2010) Changes in sexual behaviours: from secular trends to public health policies. Aids 24: 1185–1191. doi: 10.1097/qad.0b013e328336ad52
[9]  Jones EF, Forrest JD (1992) Underreporting of abortion in surveys of US women: 1976 to 1988. Demography 29: 113–126. doi: 10.2307/2061366
[10]  Levels M, Need A, Nieuwenhuis R, Sluiter R, Ultee W (2012) Unintended Pregnancy and Induced Abortion in the Netherlands 1954–2002. European sociological review 28: 301–318. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcq065
[11]  Tsui AO, Casterline J, Singh S, Bankole A, Moore AM, et al. (2011) Managing unplanned pregnancies in five countries: Perspectives on contraception and abortion decisions. Global public health 6: S1–S24. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2011.597413
[12]  Spira A, Bajos N, Giami A, Michaels S (1998) Cross-national comparisons of sexual behavior surveys—methodological difficulties and lessons for prevention. American journal of public health 88: 730–731. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.5.730
[13]  Trussell J (2008) Contraceptive efficacy. In: R Hatcher, J Trussell, A Nelson, W Cates, F Stewart, D Kowal, editors. Contraceptive Technology: 20th revised edn. New York: Ardent Media Inc. pp. 773–845.
[14]  Rossier C (2003) Estimating induced abortion rates: a review. Studies in Family Planning 34: 87–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00087.x
[15]  Warszawski J, Messiah A, Lellouch J, Meyer L, Deville JC (1997) Estimating means and percentages in a complex sampling survey: application to a french national survey on sexual behaviour (ACSF). Statistics in medicine 16: 397–423. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970228)16:4<397::aid-sim391>3.3.co;2-k
[16]  Pison G (2010) France 2009 Mean age at childbearing reaches 30 years. Population & Sociétés 465: 1–4.
[17]  Beaujouan E, Toulemon L (2013) When a poor index becomes a good proxy: on the predictive value of individual fertility preferences at the cohort macro-level Congress of the International Union for the scientific study of Population. Busan.
[18]  Rencher AC, Christensen WF (2012) Methods of multivariate analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
[19]  Barrett G, Wellings K (2002) What is a ‘planned’pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Social Science & Medicine 55: 545–557. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00187-3
[20]  Juarez F, Bayer AM (2011) ‘Without a plan’but ‘keeping on track’: Views on contraception, pregnancy and abortion in Mexico City. Global public health 6: S90–S110. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2011.581674
[21]  Matsumoto Y, Yamabe S, Regushevskaya E, Dubikaytis T, Laanpere M, et al. (2010) After 10 years: has approval of oral contraceptives really decreased the rate of unintended pregnancy in Japan? Contraception 81: 389–390. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.007
[22]  Santelli JS (2008) Medical accuracy in sexuality education: Ideology and the scientific process. American Journal of Public Health 98: 1786. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2007.119602
[23]  Foster DG, Higgins JA, Biggs MA, McCain C, Holtby S, et al. (2012) Willingness to have unprotected sex. Journal of sex research 49: 61–68. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.572307
[24]  Bajos N, Bozon M (2012) Sexuality in France: Practices, Gender & Health. Bardwell Press.
[25]  Rossier C, Michelot F, Bajos N (2007) Modeling the process leading to abortion: an application to French survey data. Studies in family planning 38: 163–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00128.x
[26]  Sihvo S, Bajos N, Ducot B, Kaminski M (2003) Women’s life cycle and abortion decision in unintended pregnancies. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57: 601–605. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.8.601
[27]  Régnier-Loilier A (2009) Does the birth of a child change the division of household tasks between partners? Population & Sociétés 461: 1–4.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus