All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

PLOS ONE  2012 

Motion Extrapolation in the Central Fovea

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033651

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Neural transmission latency would introduce a spatial lag when an object moves across the visual field, if the latency was not compensated. A visual predictive mechanism has been proposed, which overcomes such spatial lag by extrapolating the position of the moving object forward. However, a forward position shift is often absent if the object abruptly stops moving (motion-termination). A recent “correction-for-extrapolation” hypothesis suggests that the absence of forward shifts is caused by sensory signals representing ‘failed’ predictions. Thus far, this hypothesis has been tested only for extra-foveal retinal locations. We tested this hypothesis using two foveal scotomas: scotoma to dim light and scotoma to blue light. We found that the perceived position of a dim dot is extrapolated into the fovea during motion-termination. Next, we compared the perceived position shifts of a blue versus a green moving dot. As predicted the extrapolation at motion-termination was only found with the blue moving dot. The results provide new evidence for the correction-for-extrapolation hypothesis for the region with highest spatial acuity, the fovea.


[1]  Krekelberg B, Lappe M (2001) Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends in Neurosciences 24: 335–339.
[2]  Nijhawan R (2002) Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 387.
[3]  Nijhawan R (2008) Visual prediction: psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 179–198; discussion 198–239.
[4]  Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M (2002) Through the eye, slowly: delays and localization errors in the visual system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3: 191–215.
[5]  Ogmen H, Patel SS, Bedell HE, Camuz K (2004) Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect. Vision research 44: 2109–2128.
[6]  Nijhawan R (1994) Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370: 256–257.
[7]  Whitney D, Murakami I (1998) Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience 1: 656–657.
[8]  Patel SS, Ogmen H, Bedell HE, Sampath V (2000) Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. Science 290: 1051.
[9]  Purushothaman G, Patel SS, Bedell HE, Ogmen H (1998) Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396: 424.
[10]  Baldo MV, Klein SA (1995) Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature 378: 565–566.
[11]  Brenner E, Smeets JB (2000) Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 40: 1645–1648.
[12]  Krekelberg B, Lappe M (2000) The position of moving objects. Science 289: 1107.
[13]  Eagleman DM, Sejnowski TJ (2007) Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions. Journal of Vision 7: 3.
[14]  Eagleman DM, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287: 2036–2038.
[15]  Nijhawan R (1992) Misalignment of contours through the interaction of the apparent and real motion systems. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 33: 1415.
[16]  Kerzel D (2000) Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research 40: 3703–3715.
[17]  Koch C, Poggio T (1999) Predicting the visual world: silence is golden. Nature Neuroscience 2: 9–10.
[18]  Rao RP, Ballard DH (1999) Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience 2: 79–87.
[19]  Holy TE (2007) A public confession: the retina trumpets its failed predictions. Neuron 55: 831–832.
[20]  Schwartz G, Taylor S, Fisher C, Harris R, Berry MJ 2nd (2007) Synchronized firing among retinal ganglion cells signals motion reversal. Neuron 55: 958–969.
[21]  Desimone R (1998) Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 353: 1245–1255.
[22]  Maus GW, Nijhawan R (2006) Forward displacements of fading objects in motion: the role of transient signals in perceiving position. Vision Research 46: 4375–4381.
[23]  Maus GW, Nijhawan R (2009) Going, going, gone: localizing abrupt offsets of moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35: 611–626.
[24]  Maus GW, Nijhawan R (2008) Motion extrapolation into the blind spot. Psychological Science 19: 1087–1091.
[25]  Hecht E (2002) Optics. Addison-Wesley.
[26]  Nussbaum JJ, Pruett RC, Delori FC (1981) Historic perspectives. Macular yellow pigment. The first 200 years. Retina 1: 296–310.
[27]  Isobe K, Motokawa K (1955) Functional structure of the retinal fovea and Maxwell's spot. Nature 175: 306–307.
[28]  Komatsu H (2006) The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7: 220–231.
[29]  Magnussen S, Spillmann L, Sturzel F, Werner JS (2001) Filling-in of the foveal blue scotoma. Vision Research 41: 2961–2967.
[30]  Fr?hlich FW (1923) über die Messung der Empfindungszeit (Measuring the time of sensation). Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 54:
[31]  Kirschfeld K, Kammer T (1999) The Fr?hlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research 39: 3702–3709.
[32]  Müsseler J, Aschersleben G (1998) Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Frohlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics 60: 683–695.
[33]  Shi Z, Nijhawan R (2008) Behavioral significance of motion direction causes anisotropic flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-repulsion, and movement-mislocalization effects. Journal of Vision 8: 24 21–14.
[34]  Nijhawan R, Wu S (2009) Compensating time delays with neural predictions: are predictions sensory or motor? Philosophical Transactions Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 367: 1063–1078.
[35]  Dassonville P (1995) Haptic localization and the internal representation of the hand in space. Experimental Brain Research 106: 434–448.
[36]  Nijhawan R, Kirschfeld K (2003) Analogous mechanisms compensate for neural delays in the sensory and the motor pathways: evidence from motor flash-lag. Current Biology 13: 749–753.
[37]  Stevens M, Yule DH, Ruxton GD (2008) Dazzle coloration and prey movement. Proceedings Biological sciences/The Royal Society 275: 2639–2643.
[38]  Stevens M, Merilaita S (2009) Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences 364: 423–427.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal