全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Rivers of Resilience: Assessing Hydrological Baseline Data for Nature-Based Conservation in the Yala River Watershed

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1111207, PP. 1-22

Subject Areas: Environmental Sciences

Keywords: Yala River Watershed, Hydrological Monitoring, Water Quality Assessment, Nature-Based Conservation, River Discharge, Sub Catchment Confluences, Water Resource Management, RUSLE Analysis, Aquatic Environment,Environmental Impact, Ecosystem Conservation, Water Fund Project, East Africa Rivers, Water Resource Sustainability, Environmental Monitoring

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The Yala River Watershed, like many other catchment areas worldwide, faces a multitude of environmental challenges that threaten its ecological integrity and the sustainability of the communities it supports. The “Yala River Watershed Catchment Protection Project” aims to implement nature-based conservation measures to preserve the ecological integrity of the Yala River watershed. This research publication presents the methodology and results of a hydrological and water quality assessment carried out at six monitoring points strategically located at sub-catchment confluences within the watershed. The data collected from these monitoring points provide valuable insights into the current state of the hydrological regime and water quality parameters in the region. To establish the baseline hydrological conditions, discharge measurements were conducted using an Acoustic Doppler Current Velocimeter (ADV) at each monitoring point. The results revealed substantial variations in discharge rates across the points. The Cheplelachbei monitoring point showed a discharge of 0.5687 cubic meters per second, Kesses recorded 0.864 cubic meters per second, Kiutany had 0.297 cubic meters per second, Kipgorgot exhibited 1.240 cubic meters per second, Yala at Tindinyo had 18.750 cubic meters per second, and Chepkumia displayed 0.4361 cubic meters per second. Water quality analysis was also conducted at these monitoring points, including pH levels, turbidity, and nitrate concentrations. Cheplelachbei and Kiutany rivers showed acceptable pH levels, falling within the range of 5.5 - 9.5, indicating a relatively balanced aquatic environment. However, Cheplelachbei exhibited elevated turbidity levels at 40.5 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (N.T.U), surpassing the standard maximum limit of 25 N.T.U, while Kiutany displayed turbidity of 100 N.T.U. Kiutany’s nitrate concentration of 10 mg  L-1 was well below the standard maximum limit of 45 mgNO3 - L-1, implying a positive sign for human health and aquatic life. In conclusion, the findings indicated alarming levels of sedimentation, increased soil erosion, and declining water quality, attributing these issues to human activities. Based on the results, one recommendation is to implement targeted afforestation and reforestation programs in erosion-prone areas to minimize soil erosion and sedimentation. Such measures can effectively reduce the sediment load entering water bodies, thereby improving water quality and supporting biodiversity. The findings from this study serve as a crucial baseline for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed nature-based conservation measures. By establishing the current hydrological and water quality conditions, this research provides essential data to assess the impact of future conservation efforts on the Yala River watershed. The results will aid in the formulation of targeted conservation strategies, ensuring the sustainable management of water resources and the protection of aquatic ecosystems in the region. As the “Yala Water Fund” project progresses, these research-based findings will play a pivotal role in guiding evidence-based decisions for the preservation of this vital watershed.

Cite this paper

Wanjala, W. S. N. , Olutende, O. M. , Rose, W. , Joab, O. , Omuterema, O. S. and Steve, O. (2024). Rivers of Resilience: Assessing Hydrological Baseline Data for Nature-Based Conservation in the Yala River Watershed. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e1207. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111207.

References

[1]  LVBC (Lake Victoria Basin Commission) (2018) Integrated Water Resources Management Strategy for the Lake Victoria Basin.
https://www.lvbcom.org/the-lake-victoria-basin-integrated-water-resources-management-programme-lvb-iwrmp-marks-international-day-for-biological-diversity-2022/
[2]  Clausen, J.C. (2020) Water Quality and Monitoring. In: CRC Press, Ed., Fresh Water and Watersheds, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 7 p.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429441042-36
[3]  Good Practices for the Collection of Biodiversity Baseline Data (2018) Brill.
https://publications.iadb.org/en/good-practices-collection-biodiversity-baseline-data
[4]  Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) (2012) Springer-Verlag.
https://www.fao.org/land-water/land/land-governance/land-resources-planning-toolbox/category/details/ru/c/1236444/
[5]  Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment in a Developing Country (2012) InTech.
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/35065
[6]  Williams, P., Biggs, J., Stoate, C., Szczur, J., Brown, C. and Bonney, S. (2020) Nature Based Measures Increase Freshwater Biodiversity in Agricultural Catchments. Biological Conservation, 244, Article 108515.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108515
[7]  Rabotyagov, S.S., Jha, M.K. and Campbell, T. (2010) Impact of Crop Rotations on Optimal Selection of Conservation Practices for Water Quality Protection. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 65, 369-380. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.6.369
[8]  Salmiati, Arman, N.Z. and Salim, M.R. (2017) Water Quality Status of Selected Rivers in Kota Marudu, Sabah, Malaysia and its Suitability for Usage. Sains Malaysiana.
[9]  Mekong River Commission (2017) Mekong River Report Card on Water Quality. Mekong River Commission.
https://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/2017-Lower-Mekong-Regional-Water-Quality-Monitoring-Report-7July19.pdf
[10]  Mekong River Commission Secretariat (2022) State of the Basin Report 2022. Mekong River Commission.
https://reliefweb.int/report/cambodia/mekong-river-commission-annual-report-2022-part-i-key-achievements-and-impact-stories#:~:text=2022%20was%20the%20second%20year,Countries%20largely%20returned%20to%20normal
[11]  Salmiati, Arman, N.Z. and Salim, M.R. (2017) Integrated Approaches in Water Quality Monitoring for River Health Assessment: Scenario of Malaysian River. In: Tutu, H., Ed., Water Quality, IntechOpen, London, 24-39.
https://doi.org/10.5772/65703
[12]  Al-Asadi, S.A., Al-Qurnawi, W.S., Al Hawash, A.B., Ghalib, H. and Alkhlifa, N.A.H.A. (2020) Water Quality and Impacting Factors on Heavy Metals Levels in Shatt Al-Arab River, Basra, Iraq. Journal of Water and Health, 18, 735-748.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01196-1
[13]  Ahmad, W., Iqbal, J., Nasir, M.J., Ahmad, B., Khan, M.T., Khan, S.N. and Adnan, S. (2021) Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Changes on Water Quality and Human Health in District Peshawar Pakistan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, Article 3127.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96075-3
[14]  US Geological Survey (2018) Water Quality in the Sacramento River Basin, California. US Geological Survey.
https://deltacouncil.ca.gov/pdf/isb/products/2018-07-26-isb-2018-water-quality-review.pdf
[15]  Ekwere, A. and Kudamnya, E. (2022) Temporal Assessment of River Stages and Discharge Regimes of the Cross River Basin, SE-Nigeria.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1975626/v1
[16]  Imaran, M., Chakraborty, A. and Tripathy, S. (2021) Skill Assessment of GloFAS-ERA5 Operational River Discharge for the Major Indian River Catchments. ESS Open Archive. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10508045.1
[17]  Sato, Y., Kojiri, T., Michihiro, Y., Suzuki, Y. and Nakakita, E. (2013) Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on River Discharge in Japan Using the Super-High-Resolution MRI-AGCM. Hydrological Processes, 38, 3264-3279.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9828
[18]  Khaleefa, O. and Kamel, A.H. (2021) On the Evaluation of Water Quality Index: Case Study of Euphrates River, Iraq. Knowledge-Based Engineering and Sciences, 2, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.51526/kbes.2021.2.2.35-43

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413