全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Qualitative Research: Essence, Types and Advantages

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1111001, PP. 1-9

Subject Areas: Sociology

Keywords: Ethnography, Narrative, Phenomenology, Qualitative Research, Purposive Sampling, Interviews

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The main aim of qualitative research is to explore and provide deeper, comprehensive and detailed description of phenomena from non-numeric data, rather than quantifying and testing hypotheses using numeric data as is the case with quantitative research. Notably, qualitative research describes and explains relationships, individual experiences and group norms. The objective of this article is, thus, to explore and describe the essence, nature and advantages of qualitative research through a systematic review of related literature. Accordingly, the types of qualitative research are: narrative design, grounded theory, phenomenological design, case study design and ethnographic design. Moreover, sampling methods under qualitative research are mainly, purposive, criterion, convenience and snowballing, while data are collected by use of interview guides/schedules, focus group discussions, document analysis and observation (non-participant or participant). Consequently, the advantages of qualitative studies include: flexibility and spontaneity (allows for the adaptation of interview items as the research progresses and need arises), does not require a large study sample, offers the opportunity to meet the respondents, encourages discussion with the participants, allows for the collection and interpretation of non-verbal cues (smiles, frowns, tears) and offers the opportunity to seek clarification and gain deeper understanding of phenomena under study. Notably, the direct involvement of the researcher provides them the opportunity to get insightful and relevant responses from the participants.

Cite this paper

Oranga, J. and Matere, A. (2023). Qualitative Research: Essence, Types and Advantages. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e1001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001.

References

[1]  Corner, E.J., Murray, E.J. and Brett, S.J. (2019) Qualitative, Grounded Theory Exploration of Patients’ Experience of Early Mobilisation, Rehabilitation and Recovery after Critical Illness. BMJ Open, 9, e026348. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443050/
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026348
[2]  Cleland, J.A. (2017) The Qualitative Orientation in Medical Education Research. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 29, 61-71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465434/
https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2017.53
[3]  Soratto, J., Pires, D.E.P. and Friese, S. (2019) Thematic Content Analysis Using Atlas.ti Software: Potentialities for Research in Health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73, e20190250. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32321144/
https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0250
[4]  Moser, A. and Korstjens, I. (2018) Series: Practical Guidance to Qualitative Research. Part 3: Sampling, Data Collection and Analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24, 9-18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774281/
https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
[5]  Tscholl, D.W., Handschin, L., Rössler, J., Weiss, M., Spahn, D.R. and Nöthiger, C.B. (2019) It’s Not You, It’s the Design—Common Problems with Patient Monitoring Reported by Anesthesiologists: A Mixed Qualitative and Quantitative Study. BMC Anesthesiology, 19, Article No. 87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6540409/
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.238/v3
[6]  Foley, G. and Timonen, V. (2015) Using Grounded Theory Method to Capture and Analyze Health Care Experiences. Health Services Research, 50, 1195-1210. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545354/
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12275
[7]  Grossoehme, D.H. (2014). Overview of qualitative research. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 20, 109-122. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24926897
https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2014.925660
[8]  Smith, J.A. and Osborn, M. (2003) Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In Smith, J., Ed., Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Methods, Sage Publications.
[9]  Overcash, J., Ford, N., Erdeljac, H.P., Fugett, S., Knauss, B., Kress, E., Utendorf, C. and Noonan, A. (2018) Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Oncology: Best Practices in Caring for Older Patients. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 9, 640-644. https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2018.9.6.6
[10]  Zamawe, F.C. (2015) The Implication of Using NVivo Software in Qualitative Data Analysis: Evidence-Based Reflections. Malawi Medical Journal, 27, 13-15. https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v27i1.4
[11]  Palermo, C., King, O., Brock, T., Brown, T., Crampton, P., Hall, H., Macaulay, J., Morphet, J., Mundy, M., Oliaro, L., Paynter, S., Williams, B., Wright, C., and Charlotte, E.R. (2019) Setting Priorities for Health Education Research: A Mixed Methods Study. Medical Teacher, 41, 1029-1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1612520
[12]  Houghton, C., Murphy, K., Meehan, B., Thomas, J., Brooker, D. and Casey, D. (2017) From Screening to Synthesis: Using NVIVO to Enhance Transparency in Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26, 873-881. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27324875
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13443
[13]  Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. and Craig, J. (2007) Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349-357. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17872937
https://doi.org/10.1037/t74064-000

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413