Group testing is an efficient method for classifying observations and estimating trait prevalence in a population. However, using appropriate group sizes is crucial for maximizing its benefits. Adaptive schemes have been developed to address improper group size selection issues. Existing adaptive schemes are based on a Binomial sampling model, requiring testing of all groups before recording successes. In certain scenarios, like infectious diseases, immediate reporting of estimates upon detection is necessary. A two-stage adaptive Negative Binomial group testing model for such cases was constructed. This adaptive model adjusted group sizes based on estimates from previous stages thus using optimal sizes to minimize the mean squared error and variance of the prevalence rate estimate. The maximum likelihood estimation method was employed to find the model’s parameter estimate, and its properties were also investigated. The comparative analysis highlighted the superiority of the adaptive model over the non-adaptive model especially under low prevalence emphasizing the importance of incorporating adaptivity in group testing procedures, particularly in disease screening and surveillance, such as for COVID-19.
Cite this paper
Akomboh, J. , Waliaula, W. R. , Tamba, C. and Okenye, J. O. (2023). Analysis of a Two-Stage Adaptive Negative Binomial Group Testing Model for Estimating Prevalence of a Rare Trait. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e960. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110960.
Dorfman, R. (1943) The Detection of Defective Members of Large Populations. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14, 436-440.
https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731363
Wanyonyi, R.W. (2015) Estimation of Proportion of a Trait by Batch Testing Model in a Quality Control Process. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 4, 610-613. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34
Bilder, C.R., Tebbs, J.M. and Chen, P. (2010) Informative Retesting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105, 942-955.
https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2010.ap09231
Thompson, K.H. (1962) Estimation of the Proportion of Vectors in a Natural Population of Insects. Biometrics, 18, 568-576. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527902
Nyongesa, L.K. (2004) Testing for the Presence of Disease by Pooling Samples. New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 46, 383-390.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.00337.x
Chiang, C.L. and Reeves, W.C. (1962) Statistical Estimation of Virus Infection Rates in Mosquito Vector Populations. American Journal of Epidemiology, 75, 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120259
Hughes-Oliver, J.M. and Swallow, W.H. (1994) A Two-Stage Adaptive Group-Testing Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 982-993. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476832
Katholi, C.R. and Unnasch, T.R. (2006) Important Experimental Parameters for Determining Infection Rates in Arthropod Vectors Using Pool Screening Approaches. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 74, 779-785.
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.779
Pritchard, N.A. and Tebbs, J.M. (2010) Estimating Disease Prevalence Using Inverse Binomial Pooled Testing. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 16, 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-010-0036-4
Okoth, A.W., Nyongesa, L.K. and Kwatch, B.O. (2017) Multi-Stage Adaptive Pool Testing Model with Test Errors; Improved Efficiency. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 13, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.9790/5728-1301024355
Turechek, W.W. and Madden, L.V. (2003) A Generalized Linear Modeling Approach for Characterizing Disease Incidence in a Spatial Hierarchy. Phytopathology, 93, 458-466. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.4.458
Xiong, W. (2015) The Optimal Group Size Using Inverse Binomial Group Testing Considering Misclassification. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 45, 4600-4610. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2014.923461
Swallow, W.H. (1985) Group Testing for Estimating Infection Rates and Probabilities of Disease Transmission. Phytopathology, 75, 882.
https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-75-882