全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Analyzing Research Hotspots and Frontiers in Global Research on Digital Grassroots Governance through CiteSpace

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110927, PP. 1-15

Subject Areas: Information Science

Keywords: Digital Grassroots Governance, Smart City, Foreign Literature, CiteSpace

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

In order to explore the research hotspots and development trends of digital grassroots governance abroad, this study focuses on 227 documents related to “Digital Grassroots Governance” within the Scopus database, covering a span of nearly 20 years (2005-2023). We utilized CiteSpace software to perform a visual analysis of these documents. Subsequently, we constructed keyword co-occurrence networks and cluster maps to better comprehend the landscape of “digital grassroots governance”. The study reveals that foreign research on Digital Grassroots Governance primarily revolves around three core areas: public participatory governance, regional research on digital grassroots governance, and aspects related to smart city technology and services. Based on these key thematic areas, we can summarize three major research directions in foreign digital grassroots governance. All of these directions are intertwined with the governance of smart cities, encompassing smart citizen participatory governance, the digital transformation of smart city infrastructure, and the sustainable development of smart cities.

Cite this paper

Li, X. , Zhang, Y. and Xie, L. (2023). Analyzing Research Hotspots and Frontiers in Global Research on Digital Grassroots Governance through CiteSpace. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e927. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110927.

References

[1]  Ma, H.D. (2023) The Importance of Digitalization of Grassroots Governance and the Path to Improvement. Zhejiang Academic Journal, No. 5, 5-11.
[2]  Chen, Y., Chen, C.M., Liu, Z.Y., et al. (2015) The Methodology Function of CiteSpace Mapping Knowledge Domains. Studies in Science of Science, 33, 242-253.
[3]  Font, J. and Blanco, I. (2007) Procedural Legitimacy and Political Trust: The Case of Citizen Juries in Spain. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 557-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00701.x
[4]  Waema, T.M. (2009) E-Local Governance: A Case Study of Financial Management System Implementation in Two Municipal Councils in Kenya. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 2, 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2009.024964
[5]  Lim, J.H. (2010) Empowering Citizens’ Voices in the Era of e-Government: Implications from South Korean Cases. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 7, 19-31.
[6]  Martinez, J., Pfeffer, K. and Van Dijk, T. (2011) E-Government Tools, Claimed Potentials/Unnamed Limitations: The Case of Kalyan-Dombivli. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 2, 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/097542531100200206
[7]  Kim, B.J., Kavanaugh, A.L. and Hult, K.M. (2011) Civic Engagement and Internet Use in Local Governance: Hierarchical Linear Models for Understanding the Role of Local Community Groups. Administration and Society, 43, 807-835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711413873
[8]  Batty, M., Axhausen, K.W., Giannotti, F., et al. (2012) Smart Cities of the Future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214, 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
[9]  Arts, K., Van Der Wal, R. and Adams, W.M. (2015) Digital Technology and the Conservation of Nature. Ambio, 44, 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0705-1
[10]  Salvia, M., Cornacchia, C., Di Renzo, G.C., et al. (2016) Promoting Smartness among Local Areas in a Southern Italian Region: The Smart Basilicata Project. Indoor and Built Environment, 25, 1024-1038. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X16659328
[11]  Marsal-Llacuna, M.L. (2016) City Indicators on Social Sustainability as Standardization Technologies for Smarter (Citizen-Centered) Governance of Cities. Social Indicators Research, 128, 1193-1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1075-6
[12]  Patel, S., Sliuzas, R. and Georgiadou, Y. (2016) Participatory Local Governance in Asian Cities: Invited, Closed or Claimed Spaces for Urban Poor? Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 7, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425315619044
[13]  Mcdonald, L., Hickey, A. and Reynolds, P. (2016) Discerning the Air: Locating Local Government Community Engagement Practice-Reflections on Selected Australian Experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 38, 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2016.1213034
[14]  Leleux, C. and Webster, W. (2018) Delivering Smart Governance in a Future City: The Case of Glasgow. Media and Communication, 6, 163-174. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1639
[15]  Janssen, M. and Helbig, N. (2018) Innovating and Changing the Policy-Cycle: Policy-Makers Be Prepared! Government Information Quarterly, 35, S99-S105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.009
[16]  Benmansour, N.A., Lari, N.A. and Shockley, B. (2019) Exploring Local Governance and e-Services in Qatar. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 6, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.2019100101
[17]  Sgantzos, K. and Grigg, I. (2019) Artificial Intelligence Implementations on the Blockchain. Use Cases and Future Applications. Future Internet, 11, Article No. 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11080170
[18]  Kang, J. and Wang, X. (2020) The Organizational Structure and Operational Logic of an Urban Smart Governance Information Platform: Discussion on the Background of Urban Governance Transformation in China. Complexity, 2020, Article ID: 6638958. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6638958
[19]  Li, Y., Fan, Y. and Nie, L. (2023) Making Governance Agile: Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in China’s Local Governance. Public Policy and Administration, 1-26.
[20]  Krasuska, M., Williams, R., Sheikh, A., et al. (2021) Driving Digital Health Transformation in Hospitals: A Formative Qualitative Evaluation of the English Global Digital Exemplar Programme. BMJ Health and Care Informatics, 28, e100429.
[21]  Bakowska-Waldmann, E. and Kaczmarek, T. (2021) The Use of PPGIS: Towards Reaching a Meaningful Public Participation in Spatial Planning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10, Article No. 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10090581
[22]  Xu, Y.E. and Li, Z.H. (2023) Research Hotspots and Trend Analysis of Big Data Governance Based on Knowledge Graph. Information Science, 1-19.
[23]  Masik, G. and Studzińska, D. (2018) Evolution of the Smart City Concept and of Research into It. Przeglad Geograficzny, 90, 557-571. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2018.4.2
[24]  Malek, J.A., Lim, S. and Yigitcanlar, T. (2021) Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13, Article No. 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010376
[25]  Lee-Geiller, S. and Lee, T.D. (2019) Using Government Websites to Enhance Democratic E-Governance: A Conceptual Model for Evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 36, 208-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003
[26]  Kaluarachchi, Y. (2022) Implementing Data-Driven Smart City Applications for Future Cities. Smart Cities, 5, 455-474. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5020025
[27]  Parygin, D., Sadovnikova, N., Gamidullaeva, L., et al. (2022) Tools and Technologies for Sustainable Territorial Development in the Context of a Quadruple Innovation Helix. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14, Article No. 9086.
[28]  Pinto, F., Macadar, M.A. and Pereira, G.V. (2023) The Potential of eParticipation in Enlarging Individual Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. Information Technology for Development, 29, 276-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2136129
[29]  Laramee, R.S., Turkay, C. and Joshi, A. (2018) Visualization for Smart City Applications. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 38, 36-37. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2018.053491729
[30]  Chatterji, T. (2018) Digital Urbanism in a Transitional Economy—A Review of India’s Municipal e-Governance Policy. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11, 334-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2017.1332458
[31]  Jefferson, E., Cole, C., Mumtaz, S., et al. (2022) A Hybrid Architecture (CO-CONNECT) to Facilitate Rapid Discovery and Access to Data across the United Kingdom in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24, e40035. https://doi.org/10.2196/40035
[32]  Li, Y. and He, Q. (2023) Techno-Biopolitics under a Tentative “State of Exception”: The Institutional Logic of the Digital Governance of Inbound Travelers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1-20.
[33]  Pirlone, F. and Spadaro, I. (2014) Towards a Waste Management Plan for Smart Cities. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 191, 1279-1290. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC141072
[34]  Palmentieri, S. (2021) Smart Cities and the Sustainability of Urban Transport: Strategic Directions for the Metropolitan City of Naples. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 15, 83-94.
[35]  Lee-Geiller, S. and Lee, T. (2019) Co-Creating Public Value in e-Government: A Case Study of Korean Municipal Government Websites. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 15, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2019100102
[36]  Palos-Sánchez, P.R., Baena-Luna, P., García-Ordaz, M., et al. (2023) Digital Transformation and Local Government Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Assessment of Its Impact on the Sustainable Development Goals. SAGE Open, 13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231167343
[37]  Marco, A., Mangano, G. and Zenezini, G. (2015) Digital Dashboards for Smart City Governance: A Case Project to Develop an Urban Safety Indicator Model. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3, 144-152. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2015.35018

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413