全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Lecturer-Facilitated Learning vs. Self-Directed Learning. Which Motivates Students Better? —Structural Equation Modelling Approach

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110924, PP. 1-17

Subject Areas: Teaching and Learning Technologies

Keywords: Lecturer Facilitated Learning, Malaysian Private Universities, Roger’s Theory, Self-Directed Learning, Structural Equation Modelling, Student Motivation, Gen Z-ers

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The main aim of this research is to analyze Gen Z-ers’ preferences with regard to lecturer-facilitated learning and self-directed learning. The responses gathered 214 usable responses through an online survey revealed that Gen Z-ers advocate the use of technology in learning; however, their motivation to learn is higher during face-to-face classes. They find that lecturer-facilitated learning is better than self-directed, technology-facilitated learning. Gen Z-ers also place importance on interactive classroom sessions which give them an opportunity to enhance learning through handson activities. The findings of this study can assist lecturers in having a clearer understanding of Gen Z members’ expectations, and in providing a meaningful learning experience to students from this generation. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is among the first to integrate Rogers’ Theory and Self-Directed Learning Theory (SDL) as theoretical support in examining the effect of lecturer-facilitated learning and self-directed learning on university students’ motivation. In addition to that, the findings would motivate Gen Z members to reflect on their own learning needs and guide them to be more successful academically.

Cite this paper

Nair, S. G. , Sa’dom, N. Z. M. and Utanes, G. C. (2023). Lecturer-Facilitated Learning vs. Self-Directed Learning. Which Motivates Students Better? —Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e924. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110924.

References

[1]  Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Escobar, C.A. and Morales-Menendez, R. (2020) Educational Experiences with Generation Z. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14, 847-859. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343356700_Educational_experiences_with_Generation_Z https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9
[2]  Dimock, M. (2019) Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins
[3]  Pearson (2018) Meeting the Expectations of Gen Z in Higher Education. https://www.pearson.com/us/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/us/en/files/PSONA5646-8150_TIDL_GenZ_Infographic_Print_FINAL.pdf
[4]  Goldman, Z. and Martin, M. (2017) Millennial Students in the College Classroom: Adjusting to Academic Entitlement. Communication Education, 65, 365-367. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303711566_Millennial_students_in_the_college_classroom_adjusting_to_academic_entitlement https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1177841
[5]  Ishak, N.M., Ranganathan, H. and Harikrishnan, K. (2022) Learning Preferences of Generation Z Undergraduates at the University of Cyberjaya. Journal of Learning for Development, 9, 331-339. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v9i2.584
[6]  Florkowski, R., Wiza, A. and Banaszak, E. (2022) The Rogerian Student-Centered Learning Approach and the Democratization of Education. Polish Sociological Review, 218, 273-288.
[7]  Miller, A.C. and Mills, B. (2019) ‘If They Don’t Care, I Don’t Care’: Millennial and Generation Z Students and the Impact of Faculty Caring. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19, 78-89. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1234123.pdf https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i4.24167
[8]  Nair, S.G. and Sa’dom, N.Z.M. (2022) Online Teaching vs Face to Face (F2F)—Insight from Lecturers and Students of Manipal International University. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11, 1610-1625. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i3/15128
[9]  Nair, S.G., Sa’dom, N.Z.M., Yusoff, S.H.M. and Altounjy, R. (2023) The Influence of Leadership in Academia on The Standard of Teaching in Malaysian Private Universities. Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12, 763-782. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/16956
[10]  Sundresan, K., Nyen, V.C., Sa’dom, N.Z.M. and Yusoff, S.H.M. (2023) Learn from Anywhere, Anytime: Factors Influencing the Adoption of E-Learning System in Malaysian Private University. International Journal of Innovation and Business Strategy (IJIBS), 18, 26-36.
[11]  University of Wyoming (2023) Learning Theories for Educators. https://www.uwyo.edu/aded5050/5050unit9/rogers.asp
[12]  Boyatzis, R.E. (2001) Unleashing the Power of Self-Directed Learning. Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations. http://www.eiconsortium.org/pdf/self_directed_learning.pdf
[13]  Learning Theories (2013) Facilitation Theories. https://www.learning-theories.org/doku.php?id=instructional_design:facilitation_theory
[14]  Culatta, R. (2023) Experiential Learning (Carl Rogers). https://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/experiential-learning/
[15]  Trainer’s Library (2020) Boyatzis’ Theory of Self-Directed Learning. https://www.trainerslibrary.org/boyatzis-theory-of-self-directed-learning/
[16]  Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar (2014) Self-Directed Learning (SDL): A Brief Comprehensive Analysis. https://qatar-weill.cornell.edu/continuing-professional-development/topic-of-the-month/archive/self-directed-learning-sdl-a-brief-comprehensive-analysis
[17]  Geng, S., Law, K.M.Y. and Niu, B. (2019) Investigating Self-Directed Learning and Technology Readiness in Blending Learning Environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article No. 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
[18]  Robertson Jr., D.N., Zach, S. Choresh, N. and Rosenthal, I. (2021) Self Directed Learning: A Longstanding Tool for Uncertain Times. Creative Education, 12, 1011-1026. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.125074
[19]  Nair, S.G. and Bhandar, M. (2022) Impact of Academic Leaders on the Teaching Quality in Malaysian Private Universities. The 9th National and 7th International Conference on Research and Innovation Development for the Next Normal Society: Transition from the New Normal, Thailand, 1200-1230. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365614651_IC-03_Impact_of_Academic_Leaders_on_the_Teaching_Quality_in_Malaysian_Private_Universities
[20]  Cetin, S.Y. and Erel, S. (2018) Determining the Learning Preferences of the Students of the Faculty of Health Sciences in Cyprus International University. SHS Web of Conferences, 48, Article 01026. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184801026
[21]  Diz, M.R. (2021) Gen Z and Millennials in the Workplace: How Are Leaders Adapting to Their Short Attention Span and How Will They Keep Them from Leaving a Qualitative Study. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6163&context=etd
[22]  Giunta, C. (2017) An Emerging Awareness of Generation Z Students for Higher Education Professors. Archives of Business Research, 5, 90-104. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.54.2962
[23]  Schwieger, D. and Ladwig, C. (2018) Reaching and Retaining the Next Generation: Adapting to the Expectations of Gen Z in the Classroom. Information Systems Education Journal (ISEDJ), 16, 45-54. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1179303.pdf
[24]  DeLuca, C. and Chi, Y.L. (2014) Preparing Teachers for Assessment within Diverse Classrooms: An Analysis of Teacher Candidates’ Conceptualizations. Teacher Education Quarterly, 3-24. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078652.pdf
[25]  Moldenhauer, L., Londt, C. and Le Grange, J. (2017) Academic Leadership Challenges—Ensuring Relevance in the Work Integrated Learning Space. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge, Cape Town, 330-335.
[26]  Johnson, D. (2017) The Role of Teachers in Motivating Students to Learn. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 9, 46-49.
[27]  Cameron, E.A. and Pagnattaro, M.A. (2017) Beyond Millennials: Engaging Generation Z in Business Law Classes. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 34, 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlse.12064
[28]  Sharma, G. (2017) Pros and Cons of Different Sampling Techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3, 749-752.
[29]  Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2011) PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
[30]  Cavana, R., Delahaye, B. and Sekeran, U. (2001) Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
[31]  Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2014) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[32]  Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C.M. (2019) Rethinking Some of the Rethinking of Partial Least Squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53, 558-566. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665
[33]  Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.-M. (2015) SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS, Bönningstedt.
[34]  Cepeda-Carrion, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G. and Cillo, V. (2018) Tips to Use Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) in Knowledge Management Article Information. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23, 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0322
[35]  Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988) Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
[36]  Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[37]  Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., et al. (2017) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
[38]  Astrachan, C.B., Patel, V.K. and Wanzenried, G. (2014) A Comparative Study of CBSEM and PLS-SEM for Theory Development in Family Firm Research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.002
[39]  Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000) Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413