全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

The Human Language Capacity and Physics: Eleven Dimensions of Empirical Reality Proved by Construction

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110880, PP. 1-9

Subject Areas: Geometry, Linguistics

Keywords: Dimensionality, Human Language Capacity, Manifolds, Quanta, Quantum Physics, TNR-Theory, True Narrative Representations, Unextended Present Instant

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The human language capacity at the 11th dimension of the material manifold enables us to construct countless true narrative representations (TNRs) and derivatives grounded in their meaningful components. Every true narrative consists of a sequence of signs reporting a distinct sequence of material events. The simplest TNRs are constructed in a chronological order. The constructive proofs given here show that time is dynamic. Although the present instant must be unextended to be distinct from past and future instants, it includes the unbounded past and future from the vantagepoint of TNRs. Ordinary wakeful experience—during which any competent observer is not drugged, hallucinating, or cleverly deceived—reveals itself in a series of TNRs. The past is determined by existing TNRs but the future is always becoming determined as the present instant is represented. Perceptually grounded experience truthfully reported by one or many observers, outranks any system of beliefs or expectations grounded only in theories or even in the laws constructed from such theories—this follows because TNRs have been proved to be consistently (without any contradictions) connected with each other. It follows that ordinary TNRs form the whole basis for the sciences pertaining to the material world. If this is so, linguistics—at the front and center of semiotic studies, the studies of meaningful sign systems—outranks the other empirical sciences with physics at their base and material extremity.

Cite this paper

Jr., J. W. O. (2023). The Human Language Capacity and Physics: Eleven Dimensions of Empirical Reality Proved by Construction. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e880. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110880.

References

[1]  Riemann, B. (1854) Ueber Die Hypothesen, Welche Der Geometrie Zu Grunde Liegen. In: Dedekind, J., Ed., Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, Vol. 13, 133-150.
[2]  Riemann, B. and Clifford, T.W.K. (1873) On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Bases of Geometry. Nature, 8, 36-37. https://doi.org/10.1038/008036a0
[3]  Einstein, A. (1941) The Common Language of Science. In: Oller, J.W., Ed., Language and Experience: Classic Pragmatism, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 61-66.
[4]  Einstein, A. (1944) Remarks on Russell’s Theory of Knowledge. In: Oller, J.W., Ed., Language and Experience: Classic Pragmatism, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 21-29.
[5]  Peirce, C.S. (1897) The Logic of Relatives. The Monist, 7, 161-217. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist18977231
[6]  Tarski, A. (1941) The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 6, 73-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2268577
[7]  Tarski, A. (1944) The Semantic Conception of Truth. In: Feigl, H. and Sellars, W., Eds., Readings in Philosophical Analysis, Appleton, New York, NY, 341-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968
[8]  Oller, J.W. (2014) Biosemiotic Entropy: Concluding the Series. Entropy, 16, 4060-4087. https://doi.org/10.3390/e16074060
[9]  Einstein, A. (1921) Geometry and Experience. Springer Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 1-10.
[10]  Zeilinger, A. (1999) Experiment and the Foundations of Quantum Physics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, S288-S297. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S288

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413