全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Advancing Trustworthy Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Principles, Goals, and Strategies

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110870, PP. 1-14

Subject Areas: Artificial Intelligence, Information Science

Keywords: Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Advancement, Trustworthiness, Transparency, Accessibility

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

In the contemporary era, artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced transformative advancements that have significant implications for society. Nevertheless, these advancements come with challenges, notably those associated with opacity, vulnerability, and interpretability. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) systems into various aspects of human life has become increasingly pervasive. Consequently, there is a growing need to prioritize the development of trustworthy and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) as a paramount concern within the field. The main purpose of this paper is to explore the paramount importance of XAI, clarify its multifaceted meanings, and outline which consists of a series of guiding principles essential for the development of XAI. These principles simultaneously act as overarching objectives, directing the course towards ensuring transparency, accountability, and reliability in AI systems. Additionally, the paper presents two novel strategies to actualize XAI, by narrowing the difference between AI’s potential and human understanding. By addressing the intricate issues associated with XAI; this study adds to the continuing dialogue on how one might tap into the complete potential of AI technology, ensuring its responsible and ethical implementation in an ever-evolving digital environment.

Cite this paper

Sadiq, Z. and Aqib, M. (2023). Advancing Trustworthy Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Principles, Goals, and Strategies. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e870. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110870.

References

[1]  Samek, W., Wiegand, T. and Müller, K.R. (2017) Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models.
[2]  Knittel, B., Coile, A., Zou, A., Saxena, S., Brenzel, L., Orobaton, N. and Kasungami, D. (2022) Critical Barriers to Sustainable Capacity Strengthening in Global Health: A Systems Perspective on Development Assistance. Gates Open Research, 6, 116. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13632.1
[3]  Kim, P.T. and Bodie, M.T. (2021) Artificial Intelligence and the Challenges of Workplace Discrimination and Privacy. Journal of Labor and Employment Law, 35, 289-315.
[4]  Ribot, J.C., Agrawal, A. and Larson, A.M. (2006) Recentralizing While Decentralizing: How National Governments Reappropriate Forest Resources. World Development, 34, 1864-1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.020
[5]  Koshiyama, A., Kazim, E. and Treleaven, P. (2022) Algorithm Auditing: Managing the Legal, Ethical, and Technological Risks of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Associated Algorithms. Computer, 55, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2021.3067225
[6]  Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K. and Müller, H. (2019) Causability and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 9, e1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1312
[7]  Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1994) Beyond Intuition and Instinct Blindness: Toward an Evolutionarily Rigorous Cognitive Science. Cognition, 50, 41-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90020-5
[8]  Franks, B., Bangerter, A. and Bauer, M.W. (2013) Conspiracy Theories as Quasi-Religious Mentality: An Integrated Account from Cognitive Science, Social Representations Theory, and Frame Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article No. 424. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00424
[9]  Campos, D.G. (2011) On the Distinction between Peirce’s Abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the Best Explanation. Synthese, 180, 419-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9709-3
[10]  Simon, D., Snow, C.J. and Read, S.J. (2004) The Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 814-837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.814
[11]  Surden, H. (2019) Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Overview. Georgia State University Law Review, 35, 19-22.
[12]  Ramesh, A.N., Kambhampati, C., Monson, J.R. and Drew, P.J. (2004) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 86, 334-338.
[13]  Russell, S.J. (2010) Artificial Intelligence a Modern Approach. Pearson Education, Inc., London.
[14]  Jiang, Y., Li, X., Luo, H., Yin, S. and Kaynak, O. (2022) Quo Vadis Artificial Intelligence? Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00022-8
[15]  Brunette, E.S., Flemmer, R.C. and Flemmer, C.L. (2009) A Review of Artificial Intelligence. 2009 4th International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents, Wellington, 10-12 February 2009, 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARA.2000.4804025
[16]  He, J., Baxter, S.L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X. and Zhang, K. (2019) The Practical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Medicine. Nature Medicine, 25, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0
[17]  Oke, S.A. (2008) A Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 19, 535-570.
[18]  Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S. and Zhang, J. (2021) Artificial Intelligence: A Powerful Paradigm for Scientific Research. The Innovation, 2, Article ID: 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179
[19]  Korteling, J.H., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G.C., Blankendaal, R.A., Boonekamp, R.C. and Eikelboom, A.R. (2021) Human versus Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article ID: 622364. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.622364

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413