全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

An Analysis on Stance Projection Function of Modal Resources in Academic Discourse

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110265, PP. 1-11

Subject Areas: Linguistics

Keywords: Modal Resources, Academic Discourse, Stance Projection

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Persuasion is one of the important and fundamental goals for authors in academic discourse to “promote” their academic research. As for academic authors, modal resources are the key language carriers to achieve such purpose and also a major rhetorical strategy. However, the interpersonal function of modality resources as a projection of academic stance still needs further exploration. Therefore, this article attempts to explore the contribution of modal resources to the projection of academic author stances. Firstly, a general illustration is given about the interpersonal functional of academic discourse; Then, a brief introduction to the theoretical knowledge of modal resources is made as well; Finally, the stance projection function of modal resources in academic discourse is explored from the dimensions of Congruency and Metaphor. The Analysis shows that modal resources are an important rhetorical mechanism for academic authors to implicitly/explicitly project their stance evaluation, providing more flexible and diverse discourse strategies to help academic authors achieve the goal of persuasion and interpersonal communication. This has positive implications for improving academic English writing and academic discourse research.

Cite this paper

Wang, G. (2023). An Analysis on Stance Projection Function of Modal Resources in Academic Discourse. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e265. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110265.

References

[1]  Bernhardt, S.A. (1985) The Writer, the Reader and the Scientific Text. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 15, 163-174. https://doi.org/10.2190/X9D9-V33E-REN0-PDQM
[2]  Thompson, G. and Thetela, P. (1955) The Sound of One Hand Clapping: The Management of Interaction in Written Discourse. Text, 15, 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.103
[3]  Hoye, M.P. (2001) Textual Interaction. Routledge, New York.
[4]  Hyland, K. (2004) Metadiscourse in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 25, 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
[5]  Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (1988) Adverbial Stance Types in English. Discourse Processes, 11, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544689
[6]  Ignatieva, N. (2019) Transitive and Attitudinal Aspects in a Functional Analysis of Academic Discourse in Spanish. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 9, 165-178. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2019.93016
[7]  Halliday, M.A.K. (2001) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing.
[8]  Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (1989) Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect. Text, 9, 93-124. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93
[9]  Chafe, W.L. (1986) Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing. In: Wallace, L., and Nichols, C.J., Eds., Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Praeger, Westport, 261-272.
[10]  Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (1989) Language Has a Heart. Text, 9, 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
[11]  Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., et al. (1999) The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman, London.
[12]  Hyland, K. (2005) Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
[13]  Huston, S. and Thompson, G. (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[14]  Martin, J. and White, P. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Continuum, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
[15]  龙满英, 许家金. 大学生英汉同题议论文中立场标记的对比研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2010(3): 21-24.
[16]  赵晓临, 卫乃兴. 中国大学生英语书面语中的态度立场表达[J]. 外语研究, 2010(1): 59-63.
[17]  徐洪亮. 中国高级英语学习者学术语篇中的作者立场标记语的使用特点: 一项基于语料库的对比研究[J]. 外语教学, 2011(6): 44-48.
[18]  徐昉. 二语学术语篇中的作者立场标记研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2015(5): 1-7.
[19]  周惠, 刘永兵. 中国英语学习者投射语言的语篇评价研究[J]. 现代外语, 2014, 37(3): 390-399.
[20]  王冰昕, 卫乃兴. 中西学者学术论文特征性it评价型式与意义的对比研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2018(6): 53-64.
[21]  徐昉. 中国学生英语学术写作中身份语块的语料库研究[J]. 外语研究, 2011(3): 57-63.
[22]  徐昉. 二语学术写作介入标记语的使用与发展特征: 语料库视角[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2013(2): 5-10.
[23]  姜峰. 元话语名词: 学术语篇人际互动研究的新视角[J].解放军外国语学院学报, 2019, 42(2): 63-72, 159.
[24]  李战子. 情态——从语法到语篇的推广[J]. 外语学刊, 2000(4): 7-12.
[25]  Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd Edition, Hodder, London.
[26]  王根莲. 情态资源的人际意义考察[J]. 绍兴文学院学报, 2014, 34(5): 82-85.
[27]  Thompson, G. (2004) Introducing Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, London.
[28]  Hyland, K. (1999) Disciplinary Discourses: Writer Stance in Research Articles. In: Candlin, C.N. and Hyland, K., Eds., Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices, Routledge, London, 99-121.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413