全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

A Review on the Evaluation of Traditional Villages in China Based on Citespace

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110007, PP. 1-10

Subject Areas: Culture, Tourism Economy, Architecture

Keywords: Traditional Villages, Knowledge Graph, Research Review

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The protection of traditional villages is currently a hot topic of research, and the evaluation of traditional villages is the basic research content of village protection. Its research is conducive to promoting the protection of traditional villages. Through CNKI retrieval tool, 309 articles related to traditional village evaluation were retrieved, and the development trend of research related to traditional village evaluation was studied using CiteSpace data visualization method. The research shows that: 1) factors such as traditional village evaluation research and relevant policy release, regional economic situation, and the number of colleges and universities are normal distribution. 2) Scholars related to traditional village evaluation research have strong “geographical” and “academic” connections, and weak connections between institutions and disciplines. 3) Traditional village evaluation research increases the perception of the main factor evaluation of the village from the initial evaluation of the village itself. 4) The research content of traditional village evaluation is highly repetitive, lacks certain innovation and adapts to local conditions, and there is a significant gap in research between regions. 5) The research method combines qualitative and quantitative methods. 6) The research and evaluation of villages mainly focus on the evaluation of two types of villages: utilization and protection. Utilization villages often develop tourism, and the evaluation indicators mainly combine natural resources with human resources.

Cite this paper

Mo, Q. (2023). A Review on the Evaluation of Traditional Villages in China Based on Citespace. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110007.

References

[1]  袁宁, 黄纳, 张龙, 范文静, 孙克勤. 基于层次分析法的古村落旅游资源评价——以世界遗产地西递、宏村为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2012, 28(2): 179-181.
[2]  邓庆, 吴吉林, 廖珊, 尹祺玉, 石佳玉, 黄贤. 武陵山片区传统村落保护成效评价研究——以张家界石堰坪村为例[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2018(4): 103-107.
[3]  白雪. 北京焦庄户历史文化名村保护历程及其实施评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京建筑大学, 2014.
[4]  庄晨薇, 李霄鹤, 兰思仁, 张逸君. 闽北地区传统村落人文景观的分析与评价[J]. 福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 19(2): 25-29 36.
[5]  刘沛林, 于海波. 旅游开发中的古村落乡村性传承评价——以北京市门头沟区爨底下村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(11): 1304-1310.
[6]  李伯华, 杨家蕊, 刘沛林, 陈驰, 刘一曼. 传统村落景观价值居民感知与评价研究——以张谷英村为例[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 52(2): 248-255.
[7]  杨立国, 刘小兰, 陈伟杨. 传统村落利用度与评价指标体系研究——以湖南省首批中国传统村落为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2018, 34(4): 561-567 591.
[8]  邹君, 陈菡, 黄文容, 刘沛林. 传统村落活态性定量评价研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 908-917.
[9]  王云才, 郭焕成, 杨丽. 北京市郊区传统村落价值评价及可持续利用模式探讨——以北京市门头沟区传统村落的调查研究为例[J]. 地理科学, 2006(6): 735-742.
[10]  吴冰, 马耀峰. 古村落旅游资源评价与保护研究——以陕西省韩城市党家村为例[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2004(1): 121-124.
[11]  朱晓翔. 我国古村落旅游资源及其评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 河南大学, 2005.
[12]  侯国林, 黄震方. 旅游地社区参与度熵权层次分析评价模型与应用[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(10): 1802-1813.
[13]  邹君, 刘媛, 谭芳慧, 刘沛林. 传统村落景观脆弱性及其定量评价——以湖南省新田县为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(8): 1292-1300.
[14]  徐菁, 黄凯瑞. 古村落旅游开发中的乡村性评价——以南京杨柳村为例[J]. 南京晓庄学院学报, 2018(2): 102-106.
[15]  戴聪. 基于旅游资源价值评价的传统村落更新研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 湖北美术学院, 2017.
[16]  汪清蓉, 李凡. 古村落综合价值的定量评价方法及实证研究——以大旗头古村为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2006(1): 19-24.
[17]  付俊. 基于游客感知的古村落旅游资源评价方法比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2012.
[18]  周丽, 胡金龙, 李琳, 艾烨. 桂北地区传统村落旅游开发潜力评价[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(2): 21-29.
[19]  王永帅, 张中华. 传统村落景观的地方性知识构成及评价研究——以袁家村为例[J]. 中国园林, 2021, 37(12): 98-103.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413