全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Interpretation of the Positive Functions of English Pragmatic Ambiguity Based on Adaptation Theory

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109757, PP. 1-14

Subject Areas: Linguistics

Keywords: The Positive Functions of Pragmatic Ambiguity, Adaptation Theory, Communicative Context

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Pragmatic ambiguity is a universal linguistic feature. It is often regarded as a negative phenomenon and its positive functions are often ignored. Based on Verschueren’s adaptation theory, this paper takes English as an example to study the positive functions of pragmatic ambiguity. This paper first introduces the theory of adaptation theory and its correlation with the positive function of pragmatic ambiguity. Then this paper concludes that the positive function of pragmatic ambiguity is the result of the speaker’s language choice in the process of language use and his adaptation to the physical world, social world and mental world. This result proves that language use is a dynamic process. In this process, language users choose language on the basis of strategy and adapt to contextual variables and linguistic structural elements.

Cite this paper

Wei, C. (2023). Interpretation of the Positive Functions of English Pragmatic Ambiguity Based on Adaptation Theory. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e9757. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109757.

References

[1]  Leech, G.N. (1987) Semantics. Penguin Books Ltd., London, 112.
[2]  Leech, G.N. (1981) Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 217. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.i.5
[3]  Bolinger, D. (1981) Aspects of Language. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 896.
[4]  武丽果. 英语歧义及其积极语用功能研究[J]. 山西师大学报(社会科学版), 2014, 41(S4): 139-140. https://doi.org/10.16207/j.cnki.1001-5957.2014.s4.036
[5]  阮先凤. 论英语中歧义的产生、表现形式和积极作用[J]. 襄樊学院学报, 2004, 25(3): 80-85.
[6]  和春芳. 英语歧义及其语用功能[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2003.
[7]  俞东明. 语法歧义和语用模糊对比研究[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 1997(6): 30-36.
[8]  项成东. 语用歧义再探[J]. 绍兴文理学院学报, 2001, 21(5): 86-90.
[9]  姚涛. “语用歧义”辨析[J]. 科技信息, 2009(16): 147 150.
[10]  项成东. 杨坚定. 歧义的积极作用[J]. 绍兴文理学院学报, 1999(4): 35-42.
[11]  刘景霞. 语用歧义及其话语功能[J]. 山西农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 6(3): 311-314. https://doi.org/10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-816x.2007.03.025
[12]  Verschueren, J. (2000) Understanding Pragmatics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing.
[13]  王竞越. 英语歧义的形成机制及其消解、利用[J]. 知识经济, 2011(2): 168. https://doi.org/10.15880/j.cnki.zsjj.2011.02.092
[14]  宋冬梅. 语用歧义的认知机制初探——关联视角致力于有意歧义认知机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 信阳: 信阳师范学院, 2010: 52-55.
[15]  Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 103.
[16]  何自然. 认知语用学: 言语交际的认知研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2006: 18-36.
[17]  项成东. 歧义的认知机制[J]. 四川外语学院报, 2003, 19(4): 80-84.
[18]  熊学亮. 语用学和认知语境[J]. 外文学刊(黑龙江大学学报), 1996(3): 1-7.
[19]  宋冬梅. 关联理论视角下语用歧义认知机制的研究[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 37(4): 79-82.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413