全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Questions about the Criminal Reconciliation System—Taking the Provisions of Articles 288, 289 and 290 of the Criminal Procedure Law as an Example

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109305, PP. 1-7

Subject Areas: Law

Keywords: Criminal Reconciliation System, Victim, Compensation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Since the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012 fixed criminal reconciliation as a special procedure, criminal reconciliation has undergone continuous development and evolution, and its purpose is to adapt to judicial practice. However, the criminal reconciliation system still has unresolved problems from its theoretical basis and system design. This article intends to explore the traditional origins of criminal reconciliation and the loopholes in its legitimacy, question its form, explore revision suggestions for the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, and pay attention to the status and choice of the victim while protecting the human rights of the offender.

Cite this paper

Yan, C. (2022). Questions about the Criminal Reconciliation System—Taking the Provisions of Articles 288, 289 and 290 of the Criminal Procedure Law as an Example. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e9305. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109305.

References

[1]  刘凌梅. 西方国家刑事和解理论与实践介评[J]. 现代法学, 2001(1): 152-154.
[2]  陈光中, 葛琳. 刑事和解初探[J]. 中国法学, 2006(5): 3-14.
[3]  宋英辉. 刑事和解实证研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2010: 128.
[4]  陈瑞华. 刑事诉讼的私力合作模式——刑事和解在中国的兴起[J]. 中国法学, 2006(5): 15-30.
[5]  韩红兴. 我国刑事和解制度的反思及矫正[J]. 法学杂志, 2011, 32(4): 85-88.
[6]  奚玮, 江显和. 刑事和解的四项原则[N]. 检察日报, 2007-12-20(003).
[7]  岳力. 亚里士多德法治理念评述[N]. 人民法院报, 2015-01-16(005).
[8]  房保国. 被害人的刑事程序保护[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2007: 372.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413