International business, social and economic international innovation refers to the ability to develop and implement new, unique or improved to create unique value for the Country. It includes incremental or improvements to existing products, processes, services, or solutions. Consistent international cooperation and innovation skills are necessary for a country to realize its full potential and prosperity, but many Countries lack this key skill. International cooperation and innovation are essential for growth and development of every country. While some economies in developing Asia are near the forefront of international cooperation and innovation, but many other economies lag behind. This topic section outlines what policymakers can do to promote greater international cooperation and innovation in Asia. It identifies some key drivers of international cooperation and innovation in Asia. The first is education and R & D, which is not surprising because international cooperation and innovation are essentially a human cause. In a number of Asian economies, many children lack the most basic education and numeracy power skills. Therefore, decision makers must first focus on strengthening basic skills, but they must also turn to learner centered teaching practice, broaden and diversify the skill. The second driving force is entrepreneurship. Although people tend to link entrepreneurship and international innovation, less than 2% of entrepreneurs have created more than half of employment growth and innovation. Therefore, it is essential to formulate policies to promote the potential of these productive enterprises to make better economic development. The last three drivers of international cooperation and innovation are high quality Institutions, strong financial systems and big cities. High quality institutions, including the rule of law and strong property rights, give innovative entrepreneurs the confidence they need to take risks and try new ideas. The evolution of intellectual property rights in the Republic of China shows that different institutions and types of protection may be more important at different stages of development. A strong financial system can channel resources to innovators. In fact, the analysis shows that the development of financial markets, for both equity and debt, will have a positive impact on patents. Therefore, international cooperation and innovation policy need a meticulous, bottom-up approach to support local innovators. In the final, there is no shortcut to creating an innovative environment for international cooperation and innovation in Asia. The journey of international cooperation and innovation requires long-term commitment and a lot of hard work.
Cite this paper
Sarkar, M. A. , Xie, J. and Rahman, H. (2022). International Cooperation and Innovation: Evidence from Asian Countries Trade Facilitation and Economic Cooperation. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e8991. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108991.
Sarkar, A., Xie, J.P. and Lin, L.-Q. (2022) Chinese Investment Impact on the South Asian Sustainable Infrastructure Development: A Case of Bangladesh Study. NAAR.
Lee, K., Kang, R. and Park, D. (Forthcoming) Diverse Forms of Intellectual Property Rights, Innovations, and Firm Performance at Different Stages of Development: Findings from the Firm-Level Study in the Republic of Korea, 1970s-2010s. Asian Development Bank (ADB), Mandaluyong.
Li, J., Liu, C. and Gentile, E. (Forthcoming) The Effects of the Innofund Program on Technology-Based SMEs’ Performance: Evidence from Zhongguancun National Innovation Demonstration Zone (ZNID). Asian Development Bank (ADB), Mandaluyong.
Hall, B.H., Lotti, F. and Mairesse, J. (2009) Innovation and Productivity in SMEs: Empirical Evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33, 13-33.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8
Harrison, R., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J. and Peters, B. (2008) Does Innovation Stimulate Employment? A Firm-Level Analysis Using Comparable Micro-Data from Four European Countries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 35, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14216
Hobday, M. (1995) East Asian Latecomer Firms: Learning the Technology of Electronics. World Development, 23, 1171-1193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00035-B
Kerr, W.R., Nanda, R. and Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2014) Entrepreneurship as Experimentation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 25-48.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.25
Autio, E., Fu, K. and Levie, J. (Forthcoming) Entrepreneurship as a Driver of Innovation in the Digital Age. Asian Development Bank (ADB), Mandaluyong.
Chen, L., Hasan, R. and Jiang, Y. (Forthcoming) Urban Agglomeration and Firm Innovation: Evidence from Asia. Asian Development Bank (ADB), Mandaluyong.
Aldridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J., Taylor, P.C. and Chen, C.C. (2000) Constructivist Learning Environments in a Crossnational Study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 37-55.
https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289994
Brazdauskas, M. (2015) Promoting Student Innovation-Driven Thinking and Creative Problem Solving for Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 1, 75-87.
Brinkmann, S. (2019) Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Reform in India: From “Learner-Centred” to “Learning-Centred” Education. Comparative Education, 55, 9-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1541661
Chataway, J., Hanlin, R. and Kaplinsky, R. (2014) Inclusive Innovation: An Architecture for Policy Development. Innovation and Development, 4, 33-54.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2013.876800
Christopoulou, M., Lakioti, A., Pezirkianidis, C., Karakasidou, E. and Stalikas, A. (2018) The Role of Grit in Education: A Systematic Review. Psychology, 9, 2951- 2971. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.915171
Beverelli, C., Neumueller, S. and The, R. (2015) Export Diversification Effects of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement. World Development, 76, 293-310.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.07.009
Dennis, A. and Shepherd, B. (2011) Trade Facilitation and Export Diversification. World Economy, 34, 101-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01303.x
Goldberg, P., Khandelwal, A., Pavcnik, N. and Topalova, P. (2010) Imported Intermediate Inputs and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 1727-1767. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1727
Hoekman, B. and Shepherd, B. (2015) Who Profits from Trade Facilitation Initiatives? Implications for African Countries. Journal of African Trade, 2, 51-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2015.08.001
Seker, M. (2012) Importing, Exporting, and Innovation in Developing Countries. Review of International Economics, 20, 299-314.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2012.01023.x