全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

A Study on Mystification Strategies of China’s Carbon Neutrality Initiative in American Mainstream Newspaper

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1108786, PP. 1-18

Subject Areas: Linguistics

Keywords: Critical Cognitive Linguistics, Carbon Neutrality, Mystification Strategies, Discursive Construction

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Newspaper is an important carrier of mass communication, which plays the role of orientating values and guiding public opinions. The content in the mainstream news coverage can mirror, steer and even mystify public consciousness, values and behaviors. This paper, based on critical cognitive linguistics, in particular, the discursive strategies proposed by Hart, aims to examine how news on Chinese’s carbon neutrality initiative is constructed and how news discourse mystifies text-consumers in three American newspapers from 22 September 2020 to 31 December 2021. In addition, a detailed account of high-frequency words in American coverage and a high-frequency visualized network guide readers to probe into particular themes of news. Via an array of illustrations, the study shows that employment of Hart’s discursive strategies reveals the ideological mystification or bias implied in news discourse through specific construction means, thus shaping China as an irresponsible country, a nation that ignores public environmental interests and seeks political right to gain global climate governance.

Cite this paper

Mu, J. , Zhang, L. , Ma, R. , Zhang, Q. , Chen, Z. and Yang, G. (2022). A Study on Mystification Strategies of China’s Carbon Neutrality Initiative in American Mainstream Newspaper. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e8786. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108786.

References

[1]  van Dijk, T.A. (1988) News as Discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
[2]  Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (1979) Language and Control. Routledge, London.
[3]  Mu, J.F. and Lu, S.Y. (2016) A Study on the Application of De-Mystification Strategy in Selected Readings of British and American Newspapers. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 29, 155-157.
[4]  Zhuang, G.Y., Dou, X.M. and Dou, M.X. (2022) Theoretical Interpretation and Path Analysis of “Peak Carbon Dioxide Emission and “Carbon Neutrality”. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences), 50, 57-68.
[5]  Tian, H.L. (2014) Critical Discourse Analysis: Interpretations, Reflections, and Applications. Nankai University Press, Tianjin.
[6]  Wang, G.F. (2018) A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting on China’s Air Pollution in the Official Chinese-English Language Press. Discourse & Communication, 12, 645-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318771431
[7]  Liu, M. and Li, C.Y. (2017) Competing Discursive Constructions of China’s Smog in Chinese and Anglo-American English-Language Newspapers: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study. Discourse & Communication, 11, 386-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317707379
[8]  Li, Q.Y. and Yang, Y. (2018) A Comparative Study of Discursive Constructions of Chinese Smog Documentary in Chinese and American News Coverage. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 75, 205-228. https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.61353
[9]  Vreese, C., Peter, J. and Semetko, H. (2001) Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-National Comparative Study of Frames in the News. Political Communication, 18, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322934
[10]  Tong, J.R. (2014) Environmental Risks in Newspaper Coverage: A Framing Analysis of Investigative Reports on Environmental Problems in 10 Chinese Newspapers. Environmental Communication, 8, 345-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.898675
[11]  Chen, S.B. and Zhao, Y.Z. (2022) Ecological Civilization: A Blindspot in Global Media Coverage of China’s Environmental Governance. Environmental Communication, 16, 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1981419
[12]  Pan, Y.H., Opgenhaffen, M. and Gorp, B.W. (2021) China’s Pathway to Climate Sustainability: A Diachronic Framing Analysis of People’s Daily’s Coverage of Climate Change (1995-2018). Environmental Communication, 15, 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1817766
[13]  Hart, C. (2017) Cognitive Linguistic Critical Discourse Studies. In: Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J.E., Eds., The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-6
[14]  Zhang, H. (2021) Critical Cognitive Linguistics: An Analytical Perspective from Language Comprehension and Reception—Revisiting the Theoretical Construction of Critical Cognitive Linguistics. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 3, 31-43 147-148.
[15]  Zhang, H. and Jiang, L. (2008) Integration of Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Foreign Language Research, 5, 12-19.
[16]  Hart, C. (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009
[17]  Higuchi, K. (2016) A Two-Step Approach to Quantitative Content Analysis: KH Coder Tutorial using Anne of Green Gables (Part 1). Ritsumeikan Social Sciences Review, 52, 77-91.
[18]  Ryan, W. and Bernard, H. (2003) Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods, 15, 85-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
[19]  Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. Routledge, London.
[20]  Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. In: English Language Series, Longman, London.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413