As the dual attribute of both science and revolution, Marxism has not achieved a reasonable and balanced development in the domestic academic circle, and its value interpretation has been continuously demonstrated, while its scientific nature has not attracted enough attention in China. As a scientific interpretation, Marxist research presents the following characteristics abroad: the deep interpretation of the philosophy of science in the classical text of Marxist International and communist International; the repositioning of the relationship between Marxism and contemporary philosophy of science; the tentative exploration of Western Marxism.
Cite this paper
Zhang, J. (2022). Literature History of Marxism as a Philosophy of Science in Foreign Countries. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e8772. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108772.
Stanley, J.L. (1995) The Marxism of Marx’s Doctoral Dissertation. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33, 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1995.0006
Fenves, P. (1986) Marx’s Doctoral Thesis on Two Greek Atomists and the Post-Kantian Interpretations. Journal of the History of Ideas, 47, 433-452.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2709662
Bunyard, T. (2014) Book Review: Karl Marx on Technology and Alienation, Written by Amy E. Wendling. Historical Materialism, 22, 505-519.
https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341362
Amsler, S. (2007) The Politics of Knowledge in Central Asia: Science between Marx and the Market. Routledge, Florence. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961742
Graham, L.R. (1998) What Have We Learned about Science and Technology from the Russian Experience? Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616639
Creaven, S. (2013) Emergentist Marxism: Dialectical Philosophy and Social Theory. Taylor and Francis, Milton Park. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203607091
Burkett, P. (2006) Marxism and Ecological Economics, a Red and Green Political Economics. Brill Publishers, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047408567