全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

A Pragmatic Approach to Evasions at the Press Conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1107892, PP. 1-10

Subject Areas: Linguistics

Keywords: Evasion, Cooperative Principle, Relevance Theory, Press Conference

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The paper focuses on evasions at the press conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and aims at providing a linguistic explanation for the existence and strategies of those evasions within the framework of the Cooperative Principle and the Relevance Theory. The author collected 229 questions and answers from seventeen press conferences in May, 2021. Based on the analysis of the data, nine evasion strategies are recognized. And three typical evasion strategies are analyzed by three examples. The results show that Chinese spokespeople tend to use covert and overt evasions to save country’s face and safeguard the national interests. And the cooperation between the spokesperson and the questioning journalist is limited, which gives rise to evasive answers.

Cite this paper

Zhang, F. (2021). A Pragmatic Approach to Evasions at the Press Conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7892. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107892.

References

[1]  Bull, P. and Mayer, K. (1993) How Not to Answer Questions in Political Interviews. Political Psychology, 14, 651-666. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791379
[2]  Galasinski, D. (2000) The Language of Deception: A Discourse Analytical Study. Sage Publications, Inc., London.
[3]  Bavelas, J.B., Black, A., Bryson, L. & Mullett, J. (1998) Political Equivocation: A Situational Explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8800700204
[4]  Bull, P. (1994) On Identifying Questions, Replies, and Non-Replies in Political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94132002
[5]  Bull, P. (1998) Equivocation Theory and News Interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X980171002
[6]  Clayman, S.E. (1993) Reformulating the Question: A Device for Answering/Not Answering Questions in News Interviews and Press Conferences. Text—Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 13, 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1993.13.2.159
[7]  Levinson, S.C. (2001) Pragmatics. 11th Edition, Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing, China.
[8]  Orr, C.J. and Burkins, K.E. (1976) The Endorsement of Evasive Leaders: An Exploratory Study. Central States Speech Journal, 62, 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977609367898
[9]  Ng, S.H. and Bradac, J.J. (1993) Power in Language. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Newbury Park.
[10]  Wei, Z.J. (2006) Pragmatic Vagueness from the Perspective of Diplomatic Language. Foreign Language Research, 2, 45-51.
[11]  Dou, W.L. and Zhang, X.Y. (2008) A Comparative Analysis of Evasive Strategies of Chinese and American Government Spokesmen—A Case Study of the North Korean Nuclear Issue. Foreign Language Teaching, 4, 53-57 63.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413