Curriculum planning and subsequent process of course design and implementation are so important in educational programmes that we simply cannot ignore them. Curriculum is essentially a series of activities and learning outcome goals pertaining to each subject. The main purposes of curriculum development are to improve student learning experiences and enhance outcomes by facilitating quality teaching, identifying a suitable syllabus, and assessing learning outcomes. However, educational programmes fail to yield the results of the programmes due to insufficient attention paid to curriculum. Perhaps, the most salient reason for this is the synonymous identification of the terms, curriculum and syllabus. While curriculum is a comprehensive area of study which needs identification of significant disciplines, syllabus could be a factor within the curriculum framework. Literature has proved that possible frameworks or models of curriculum could bring about enormous results. The paper presents a viable curriculum framework mostly suitable for university and the higher education sector with significant areas such as planning, and interrelationships of teaching, learning, assessment, and syllabus. The paper has highlighted the important areas pertaining to curriculum in its framework as a model for curriculum which is useful for development, implementation, revision, and evaluation.
Cite this paper
Dhanapala, R. M. (2021). Triangular Framework for Curriculum Development in the Education Sector. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7490. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107490.
Finney, D. (2002) The ELT Curriculum. In: Richards, J.C. and Renandya, W.A., Eds., Methodology in Language Teaching, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 70.
Richards, J.C., Platt, J. and Platt, H. (1992) Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Longman, Pearson Education Limited, Essex.
Tyler, R.W. (1957) The Curriculum Then and Now. In: Proceedings of the 1956 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, 79.
Macdonald, J.B. (1965) Educational Models for Instruction. In: Macdonald, J.B. and Leeper, R.R., Eds., Theories in Instruction, Association for Super Vision and Curriculum Development, Washington DC, 5.
Breen, M.P. (2001) Syllabus Design. In: Carter, R. and Nunan, D., Eds., The Cambridge Guide to TESOL, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 151-159.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.023
Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. (1987) English for Specific Purposes: A Learning Centered Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
Dhanapala, R.M. (2012) Impact of ELT Programmes of the Faculty of Management Studies of Rajarata University of Sri Lanka on the English Language Proficiency Needs of the Private Sector Business Organizations: A Case Study. Unpublished M. Phil. Dissertation, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya.
Longe, R.S. (1984) Planning for a Responsive Curriculum. In: Obanya, P., Ed., Curriculum, in Theory and in Practice, Educational Research and Study Group, Ibadan.
Armstrong, P. (2010) Bloom’s Taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching, Nashville. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy
Richards, J.C. and Renandya, W.A. (2002) Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190