This qualitative research is a case study focusing on leadership style and how leaders in School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University (SES, NNU), carry out their leadership. Interview method is used for the study with 5 questions, 1) What are your major responsibilities? 2) What do you look for when you observe subordinates? 3) What are some ways you provide to support for subordinates? 4) What would you say are the most pressing issues that you are deliberating on now? 5) How would you describe your leadership style? Respondents in this study are two leaders in SES, NNU. The theory of the organizational frame by Bolman and Deal (2008) is used to analyze the response and date I have collected. By study, I want to see, 1) How the leaders in SES, NNU make sense of their organization, 2) How they apply their leadership into practice leadership according to the character of their organizational situations, 3) What implication we can have to our practice? I find that two leaders understand SES and its staff. They carry out their leadership in perspective of structural frame mainly and show some skills for political frame and that of human resources as well. Their practice implies us that organization frame provides a foundation for leadership style. What’s more, organizational analysis, tacit understanding of the organization, appropriate measures, harmonious relationship and positive role by leaders and subheads are important for effective and efficient leadership.
Cite this paper
Jiang, H. (2020). Leadership in Perspective of the Organizational Frame. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e7026. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107026.
Kirkpatrick, S.A. and Locke, E.A. (1991) Leadership: Do Traits Matter? The Academy of Management Executive, 5, 48-60. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274679
Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R. and Gerhardt, M.W. (2002) Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765-780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. and White, R.K. (1939) Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 269-299.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366
Kahn, R.L. and Katz, D. (1953) Leadership Practices in Relation to Productivity and Morale. In: Cartwright, D. and Zander, A., Eds., Group Dynamics, Harper & Row, New York.
Fiedler, F.E. (1964) A Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 149-190.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60051-9
Fiedler, F.E. (1971) Validation and Extension of the Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: A Review of Empirical Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031454
Fiedler, F.E. (1976) The Leadership Game: Matching the Man to the Situation. Organizational Dynamics, 4, 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(76)90032-2
Dansereau, F. (1995) A Dyadic Approach to Leadership: Creating and Nurturing This Approach under Fire. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 479-490.
https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90022-5
Graen, G.B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
House, R. and Howell, J. (1992) Personality and Charismatic Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 3, 81-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(92)90028-E
Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1987) Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637-647.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306715
Andrews, D. and Crowther, F. (2002) Parallel Leadership: A Clue to the Contents of the “Black Box” of School Reform. International Journal of Educational Management, 16, 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540210432128
Cheng, Y.C. (1994) Principle’s Leadership as a Critical Indicator of School Performance: Evidence from Multi-levels of Primary Schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345940050306