All Title Author
Keywords Abstract


Statistics and Analysis of the Results of the First-Class Think Tanks in the United States

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1106005, PP. 1-14

Subject Areas: Education, Sociology

Keywords: Think Tank, Think Tank Results, Think Tanks in the United States, SciVal

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This article conducts quantitative analysis and research on the results of the first-class think tanks in the United States, and aims to provide reference for China’s developing first-rate think tanks and provide suggestions for future development routes. This article uses Elsevier’s Scopus database and SciVal analysis platform to quantitatively analyze the research results of 5 first-class think tanks in the United States in the past 10 years, using indicators such as h index, normalized impact factor, and high cited literature ratio to make a horizontal comparison of the development trends of the institutions, and further summarize and analyze on this basis. Through the analysis and research of the results of the five first-class think tanks in the United States, it provides a quantitative and in-depth important reference for China to build a world-class think tank.

Cite this paper

Liu, J. , Li, J. and Qin, J. (2020). Statistics and Analysis of the Results of the First-Class Think Tanks in the United States. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106005.

References

[1]  Cui, Y.H. (2018) Research on Frontier Topic Detection and Feature Analysis Based on Global Micromodel. Library and Information Service, 62, 75-82.
[2]  Guo, B. (2018) Research on Strategies for Increasing the Influence of Think Tank’s Overall Products. Information Magazine, No. 9, 86-92.
[3]  Xu, Z.W. (2012) Principle of SciVal Spotlight Evaluation Index and Comparative Study with ESI. Library and Information Service, No. 14, 86-92.
[4]  Zhang, X. (2018) Reflections on the Dilemma and Construction of Chinese Think Tank Evaluation System. Information Magazine, No. 8, 68-70.
[5]  Cao, J. (2016) Investigation Analysis and Enlightenment of Think Tank Results in Foreign Universities. Journal of Information, 35, 59-64.
[6]  Ren, H. (2018) Research on the Connotation Characteristics, Operation Mechanism and Optimization Strategies of Chinese Think Tank Market. Journal of Information, 37, 7-14. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1167.G3.20180820.1358.004.html
[7]  Xia, C.H. (2013) Comparative Study on External Environmental Factors of Chinese and American Think Tanks. Frontiers, No. 1, 7-9.
[8]  Fu, G.W. (2017) Differential Policy Analysis of Think Tank Development Path. Nanjing Social Sciences, No. 9, 7-19.
[9]  Feng, X.B. (2018) Knowledge Base and Hot Trend of Corporate Reverse Internationalization Research, Bibliometric Analysis Based on Web of Science. Journal of Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, No. 10, 449-458.
[10]  Song, Z.H. (2018) RAND’s Product Overview and Enlightenment of Output Strategy. Information Magazine, No. 6, 27-32.
[11]  Luan, R.Y. (2017) Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Social Science Abstracts, No. 9, 8-10.
[12]  Qi, Y. (2016) Brookings Institution of 100 Years: From helping decision-making to improving governance. Social Governance, No. 6, 137-140.
[13]  McGann, J. (2018) Global Think Tank Report 2017. University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA.
[14]  Weeks, J.M. (2011) The Carnegie institution of Washington current reports, 1952-1957.
[15]  Winthrop, R. (2014) The Case for Global Education. Brookings Institution, How Think Tanks Shape Social Development Policies, 65-75.
[16]  Rescher, N. (2018) Early RAND as a Talent Incubator: An Extraordinary Experiment. Independent Review, 22, 417-427.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

微信:OALib Journal