Biolinguistics is an interdisciplinary subject derived from the interaction of biology and linguistics. In 1967, after the publication of Biological Foundations of Language by Lenneberg E.H., the vision of Language study has been introduced into the field of biology. Later, Chomsky proposed the term of language faculty and regarded language as “an organ of the body”. Different from traditional linguists’ description of the rules of language externalization, Chomsky focuses on the biological mechanism of internalized language. The challenge of theory of evolution in biology has also enriched the study of the origin and evolution of language. This thesis will begin with the mythological origin and philosophical foundation of language, chase the challenge of evolutionary theory, and discuss two groups of basic properties of language, which is unity and diversity, recursiveness and thinking, so as to further study the relation between language and its biological basis, that is, from language and speech organ, language and thought to language and gene, to analyze the uniqueness of human language competence.
Cite this paper
Shao, Z. (2019). Language Evolution in Biolinguistics from a Multi-Factor Perspective. Open Access Library Journal, 6, e5867. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105867.
Ferretti, F., Adornetti, I., Chiera, A., Cosentino, E. and Nicchiarelli, S. (2018) Introduction: Origin and Evolution of Lan-guage—An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Topoi, 37,219-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9560-6
Corballis, M.C. (2017) Language Evolution: A Changing Perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.013
Laland, K.N., Uller, T., Feldman, M.W., et al. (2015) The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, Article ID: 20151019. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019
Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. (1990) Natural Language and Natural Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707-727. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00081061
Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. (1979) The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 205, 581-598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086
Gould, S.J. and Eldredge, N. (1977) Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3, 115-151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300005224
Fischmeister, F.P., Mauricio, M.J.F., Beisteiner, R. and Fitch, W.T. (2016) Self-Similarity and Recursion as Default Modes in Human Cognition. Cortex, 97, 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.08.016
Janik, V.M. and Slater, P.J.B. (1997) Vocal Learning in Mammals. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 26, 59-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60377-0
Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Murphy, J., Sevcik, R.A., Brakke, K.E., Williams, S.L., Rumbaugh, D.M. and Bates, E. (1993) Language Comprehension in Ape and Child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 122, 231-263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166068
Jürgens, U. (1998) Neuronal Control of Mammalian Vocalization, with Special Reference to the Squirrel Monkey. Naturwissenschaften, 85,376-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050519
Moore, B.R. (1992) Avian Movement Imitation and a New Form of Mimicry: Tracing the Evolution of a Complex Form of Learning. Behaviour, 122, 231-263. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853992X00525
Kuhl, P.K. and Miller, J.D. (1978) Speech Perception by the Chinchilla: Identification Functions for Synthetic VOT Stimuli. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 905-917. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381770
Kluender, K.R., Lotto, A.J., Holt, L.L., et al. (1998) Role of Experience for Language-Specific Functional Mappings of Vowel Sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 3568-3582. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423939
Fitch, W.T. (1997) Vocal Tract Length and Formant Frequency Dispersion Correlate with Body Size in Rhesus Macaques. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1213-1222. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.421048
Ramus, F., Hauser, M.D., Miller, C., Morris, D. and Mehler, J. (2000) Language Discrimination by Human Newborns and by Cotton-Top Tamarin Monkeys. Science, 288, 349-351. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5464.349
Martins, M.J.D., Mur?i?, Z., Oh, J. and Fitch, W.T. (2015) Representing Visual Recursion Does Not Require Verbal or Motor Resources. Cognitive Psychology, 77, 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.01.004
Martins, M.D., Gingras, B., Puig-Waldmueller, E. and Fitch, W.T. (2017) Cognitive Representation of ‘‘Musical Fractals”: Processing Hierarchy and Recursion in the Auditory Domain. Cognition, 161, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.001
Dong, Y.Z. and Zhang, R. (2009) New Horizons in the Study on the Biological Mechanism of Language: FOXP2 and Human Language Faculty. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 4, 355-359.
Lai, C.S.L., Fisher, S.E., Hurst, J.A., Vargha-Khadem, F. and Monaco, A.P. (2001) A Forkhead-Domain Gene Is Mutated in a Severe Speech and Language Disorder. Nature, 413, 519-523. https://doi.org/10.1038/35097076
Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S.E., Lai, S.L., Wiebe, V., Kitano, T., Monaco, A.P. and Paabo, S. (2002) Molecular Evolution of FOXP2, a Gene Involved in Speech and Language. Nature, 418, 869-972. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01025
Atkinson, E.G., Audesse, A.J., Palacios, J.A., Bobo, D.M., Webb, A.E., Ramachandran, S. and Henn, B.M. (2018) No Evidence for Recent Selection at FOXP2 among Diverse Human Populations. Cell, 174, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.048
Zhao, Y.G. (2018) Explanations on the Evolution of Language and the Forward Road of Bio-Linguistics: Concurrent Comments on Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. Academic Exploration, 6, 107-116.
Berwick, R.C. and Chomsky, N. (2016) Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001