All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Assessing the Need for PhD in Information Studies: Stakeholder Insights

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1105322, PP. 1-18

Subject Areas: Information Science, Education

Keywords: Information Studies Higher Education, Doctoral Programs, Stakeholder Insights, PhD Program Development

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Seeking insights of stakeholders is an important element of the needs assessment process for starting a doctoral program. This paper reports a study that reviewed the perspectives of stakeholders with regard to a PhD in information studies. Feedback from major stakeholders was sought using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods: a web-based survey of 180 relevant stakeholders (including current master students, alumni of the department, faculty members and working information professionals) followed by a focus group discussion with 7 faculty members from Kuwait University and Public Authority for Training and Education. Findings showed that there was a need for starting a PhD program in information studies at Kuwait University. Data also provided important insights about the structure of the proposed program, its content, areas of coursework and specializations. Results of the study might be useful for developing a PhD program in other universities. The findings are also expected to provide guidelines for conducting needs assessment for doctoral programs in information studies.

Cite this paper

Rehman, S. , Chaudhry, A. S. and Alasousi, H. O. (2019). Assessing the Need for PhD in Information Studies: Stakeholder Insights. Open Access Library Journal, 6, e5322. doi:


[1]  Robbins-Carter, J. and Seavey, C.A. (1986) The Master’s Degree: Basic Preparation for Professional Practice. Library Trends, 34, 561-580.
[2]  Williamson, C.C. (1923) Training for Library Service: A Report Prepared for the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Carnegie Corp., New York.
[3]  Bobinski, G.S. (1986) Doctoral Programs in Library and Information Science in the United States and Canada. Library Trends, 697-714.
[4]  Hayes, R.M. (1986) Accreditation. Library Trends, 34, 537-559.
[5]  Rehman, S. (2000) Preparing the Information Professional: An Agenda for the Future. Greenwood Publishing, Westport.
[6]  Paris, M. (1991) Library School Closings: The Need for Action. The Library Quarterly, 61, 259-262.
[7]  Saracevic, T. (1994) Closing of Library Schools in North America: What Role Accreditation? Libri, 44, 190-200.
[8]  Mokros, H.B. (2008) One iSchool’s Ideas and Identity: Doctoral Research and Training at Rutger’s—SCILS 1959-2007.
[9]  Jaeger, P.T., Golbeck, J., Druin, A. and Fleischmann, K.R. (2010) The First Workshop on the Future of iSchool Doctoral Education: Issues, Challenges, and Aspirations. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 51, 201-208.
[10]  Powell, R.R., Baker, L.M. and Mika, J.J. (2002) Library and Information Science Practitioners and Research. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 49-72.
[11]  Fleming-May, R. and Yuro, L. (2009) From Student to Scholar: The Academic Library and Social Sciences PhD Students’ Transformation. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9, 199-221.
[12]  Kniffel, L. (2009) Illinois’s Dominican University Establishes LIS PhD Program. American Libraries, 40, 21.
[13]  Sugimoto, C.R. (2012) Initiation, Cultivation, Separation and Redefinition: Application of Kram’s Mentoring Framework to Doctoral Education in Information and Library Science. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53, 98-114.
[14]  Bennett-Kapusniak, R., Glover, J., McCleer, A., Thiele, J. and Wolfram, D. (2016) Planning LIS Doctoral Education around a Focused Theme: A Report on the B2A Program. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 57, 69-78.
[15]  Servage, L. (2009) Alternative and Professional Doctoral Programs: What Is Driving the Demand? Studies in Higher Education, 34, 765-779.
[16]  Garcia-Quevedo, J., Mas-Verdú, F. and Polo-Otero, J. (2012) Which Firms Want PhDs? An Analysis of the Determinants of the Demand. Higher Education, 63, 607-620.
[17]  Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D. and Shmatko, N. (2017) Myths and Realities of Highly Qualified Labor and What It Means for PhDs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8, 758-767.
[18]  Grimm, K. (2018) Assessing the Industrial PhD: Stakeholder Insights. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8, 214-230.
[19]  Edwards, M.L. (2003) A Web-Based Assessment for the Need to Develop Graduate Degree Programs in Prosthetics and Orthotics. Thesis for Master’s of Health Professions Education in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois, Chicago.
[20]  Valera, G. (2007) A Needs Assessment for a Ph.D. Program in Public Administration for Texas State University. An Applied Research Project (Political Science 5397), Department of Political Science Texas State University.
[21]  Cansiz, M. and Cansiz, N. (2015) A Needs Assessment for Graduate Programs in Education Faculties. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 5, 2146-7463.
[22]  Rehman, S. (2018) Doctoral Studies: Development and Design. In: Chaudhry, A.S., Rehman, S. and Majid, S., Eds., Information Education: Imperative of the Digital Environment, Noor Publishing, Saarbrücken, 280 p.
[23]  Smith, R.L., Maroney, K., Nelson, K.W., Abel, A.L. and Abel, H.S. (2006) Doctoral Programs: Changing High Rates of Attrition. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 45, 17.
[24]  Ng, S.F., Muhd, N.M.N., AbRahman, K. and Ismail, N. (2011) Influential Factors to Pursue Doctorate Degree in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2028-2032.
[25]  Basil, M.D. and Basil, D.Z. (2006) The Marketing Market: A Study of PhD Supply, Demand, Hiring Institutions, and Job Candidates. Journal of Business Research, 59, 516-523.
[26]  Druin, A., Jaeger, P.T., Golbeck, J., Fleischmann, K.R., Lin, J., Qu, Y., Xie, B., et al. (2009) The Maryland Modular Method: An Approach to Doctoral Education in Information Studies. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 293-301.
[27]  Nelson, K. (2014) Challenges and Opportunities for PhD’s: Expectations of Employment in Non-Academic or Non-Tenure Environments. Aaua, 29, 68-77.
[28]  Cooke, N.A. (2014) The Spectrum Doctoral Fellowship Program: Enhancing the LIS Professoriate. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 10.


comments powered by Disqus