Aim: To compare the systolic and diastolic blood
pressure in both arms in elderly patients by mercury sphygmomanometer and
oscillometric recorders adopting standard practice of measuring blood pressure.
Materials and methods: It is a
cross sectional study done in 204 elderly patients aged more than 60 years over
a period of two months at teaching hospital, Jaffna, Sri Lanka. Blood pressure
was measured in both arms by both devices adopting the standard practice of
blood pressure measurements. Results: The mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) by
oscillometric recorder on both right and left arm was 4.18mmHg and 3.66 mmHg
higher than mercury sphygmomanometer readings. The mean Diastolic Blood
Pressure (DBP) by oscillometric recorder on both right arm and left arm was
1.67 and 1.64 mmHg lower than mercury sphygmomanometer readings. There wasn’t any significant difference in inter arm
blood pressure measurement. The study group consisted of 54.3% males and 45.7%
of females. The mean age of the study group was 69.46 years. Conclusion: Though there is no much difference observed in the
gross values in reading the blood pressure by both oscillometric recorders and
mercury sphygmomanometers, there is statistically significant discrepancy in
blood pressure readings particularly in the elderly population which needs to
be studied further in detail.
Cite this paper
Sujanitha, V. , Kumanan, T. , Guruparan, M. and Inthuja, T. (2018). Mercury versus Oscillometric Device in Measuring Blood Pressure in Elderly: Which Is Authentic?. Open Access Library Journal, 5, e4353. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104353.
Wijewardene, K., Mohideen, M.R., Mendis, S., et al. (2005) Prevalence of Hypertension, Diabetes and Obesity: Baseline Findings of a Population Based Survey in Four Provinces in Sri Lanka. Ceylon Medical Journal, 50, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v50i2.1571
Katulanda, P., Ranasinghe, P., Jayawardena, R., et al. (2014) The Prevalence, Predictors and Associations of Hypertension in Sri Lanka: A Cross-Sectional Population Based National Survey. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, 36, 484-491. https://doi.org/10.3109/10641963.2013.863321
Qaseem, A., Wilt, T.J., Rich, R., et al. (2017) Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertension in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older to Higher versus Lower Blood Pressure Targets: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 166, 430-437. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-1785
Bliziotis, I.A., Destounis, A. and Stergiou, G.S. (2012) Home versus Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressure in Predicting Target Organ Damage in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Hypertension, 30, 1289-1299. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283531eaf
Hodgkinson, J., Mant, J., Martin, U., et al. (2011) Relative Effectiveness of Clinic and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared with Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Diagnosis of Hypertension: Systematic Review. British Medical Journal, 342, d3621. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3621
Canzanello, V.J., Jensen, P.L. and Schwartz, G.L. (2001) Are Aneroid Sphyg-momanometers Accurate in Hospital and Clinic Setting. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 729-731. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.161.5.729
Bavishi, C., Bangalore, S., Messerli, F.H. (2017) Outcomes of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Older Hypertensive Patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69, 486-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.077
Shahbabu, B., Dasgupta, A., Sarkar, K. and Sahoo, S.K. (2016) Which Is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 10, 11-14.