All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Social Preferences, Financial Literacy and Intertemporal Choice

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1103699, PP. 1-11

Subject Areas: Behavioral Economics

Keywords: Social Preferences, Social Value Orientation, Financial Literacy, Intertemporal Choice, Hyperbolic Discounting, Impatience

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


We evaluate the relationship between social preferences, financial literacy and intertemporal choice in questionnaires distributed to university students. Most respondents perform well on a financial literacy test, and the majority show prosocial value orientation. Older students tend to be more prosocial, but we cannot confirm in our sample that females are more prosocial than males. We cannot confirm, either, that the prosocial are more financially literate than individualists and the competitive. Most respondents do not show hyperbolic discounting, and its incidence abates as both stakes and payoff delays increase. Prosocial participants also reveal to be more patient across the questionnaires.

Cite this paper

Silva, S. D. , Faveri, D. D. , Correa, A. and Matsushita, R. (2017). Social Preferences, Financial Literacy and Intertemporal Choice. Open Access Library Journal, 4, e3699. doi:


[1]  Jamison, J. and Wegener, J. (2010) Multiple Selves in Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 832-839.
[2]  Da Silva, S., Matsushita, R. and De Carvalho, M. (2015) Prosocial People Take Better Care of Their Own Future Well-Being. Open Access Library Journal, 2, e2181.
[3]  Spreng, R.N., Mar, R.A. and Kim, A.S.N. (2009) The Common Neural Basis of Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, Navigation, Theory of Mind and the Default Mode: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 489- 510.
[4]  Murphy, R.O., Ackermann, K.A. and Handgraaf, M.J.J. (2011) Measuring Social Value Orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 771-781.
[5]  Murphy, R.O. and Ackermann, K.A. (2011) A Review of Measurement Methods for Social Preferences. ETH Zurich Chair of Decision Theory and Behavioral Game Theory Working Paper.
[6]  Nax, H.H., Murphy, R.O. and Ackermann, K.A. (2015) Interactive Preferences. Economics Letters, 135, 133-136.
[7]  De Dreu, C.K.W. and Boles, T.L. (1998) Share and Share Alike or Winner Take All?: The Influence of Social Value Orientation upon Choice and Recall of Negotiation Heuristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 253-276.
[8]  Roch, S.G., Lane, J.A.S., Samuelson, C.D., Allison, S.T. and Dent, J.L. (2000) Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Pro- cesses, 83, 185-212.
[9]  Zeelenberg, M., Nelissen, R.M.A., Breugelmans, S.M. and Pieters, R. (2008) On Emotion Specificity in Decision Making: Why Feeling Is for Doing. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 18-27.
[10]  Van Lange, P.A.M., De Bruin, E.M.N., Otten, W. and Joireman, J.A. (1997) Development of Prosocial, Individualistic, and Competitive Orientations: Theory and Preliminary Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733-746.
[11]  Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O.S. (2011) Financial Literacy and Planning: Implications for Retirement Wellbeing. NBER Working Paper No. 17078.
[12]  Moreira, B., Matsushita, R. and Da Silva, S. (2010) Risk Seeking Behavior of Preschool Children in a Gambling Task. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 794-801.
[13]  Campbell, B.C., Dreber, A., Apicella, C.L., Eisenberg, D.T., Gray, P.B., Little, A.C., Garcia, J.R., Zamore, R.S. and Lum, J.K. (2010) Testosterone Exposure, Dopaminergic Reward, and Sensation-Seeking in Young Men. Physiology & Behavior, 99, 451-456.
[14]  Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P.J. (2008) Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence. In: Plott, C. and Smith, V., Eds., Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1, Elsevier, New York, 1061-1073.
[15]  Da Silva, S., De Faveri, D., Correa, A. and Matsushita, R. (2017) High-Income Consumers May Be Less Hyperbolic When Discounting the Future. (Unpublished)
[16]  Sutter, M., Kocher, M.G., Glatzle-Rüetzler, D. and Trautmann, S.T. (2013) Impatience and Uncertainty: Experimental Decisions Predict Adolescents’ Field Behavior. American Economic Review, 103, 510-531.
[17]  Liebrand, W.B.G. and McClintock, C.G. (1988) The Ring Measure of Social Values: A Computerized Procedure for Assessing Individual Differences in Information Processing and Social Value Orientation. European Journal of Personality, 2, 217-230.
[18]  Liebrand, W.B.G. (1984) The Effect of Social Motives, Communication and Group Size on Behaviour in an n-Person Multi-Stage Mixed-Motive Game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 239-264.
[19]  Balliet, D. and Joireman, J. (2010) Ego Depletion Reduces Proselfs’ Concern with the Well-Being of Others. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 227-239.
[20]  Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and O’Donoghue, T. (2002) Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.
[21]  Prelec, D. and Loewenstein, G. (1991) Decision Making over Time and under Uncertainty: A Common Approach. Management Science, 37, 770-786.
[22]  Bartels, D.M. and Urminsky, O. (2011) On Intertemporal Selfishness: How the Perceived Instability of Identity Underlies Impatient Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 182-198.


comments powered by Disqus