Construction of Social Cohesion and Living Together in the Cameroonian Public Space: Differences of Opinion versus the Emergence of a Common Sense in Discourse
Social cohesion and living together increasingly appear to be a response by the public authorities to the emergence of identity claims in Cameroon, in a context marked by the Anglophone crisis. Indeed, the socio-historical evolution reveals that living together in Cameroonian society changes considerably according to the social crises that animate it. It is therefore necessary to question the construction of these two concepts, in a dynamic marked by the reconfiguration of the public space characterised by occurrences in journalistic discourse. The aim of this proposal is to analyse the different conceptions that emerge from debates on cohesion and living together in the Cameroonian public space, in order to detect the true meaning that emerges from them. Our general objective is to explore the possibilities of constructing a problematic in the public space, namely living together, based on what is said by the actors in televised debates. The observation of the public space in particular that circumscribed by televised debates, reveals a frequency of their discursive use. The questions we asked ourselves were the following: How are the notions of living together and social cohesion constructed in televised debates in Cameroon? How do citizens position themselves in the face of the multitude of identity allegiances with which they identify in the public space? In order to provide some answers to this question, we observed and analysed the statements made by actors on stage in televised debates on four television channels. We were particularly interested in the debates on living together and social cohesion, and by means of discourse analysis we were able to detect the content of these notions. Our analysis of the television debates shows that social cohesion is presented as the manifestation of “living together”, in the sense that it implies an interweaving of identities between the different strata of the population with a view to their full participation in the construction of the whole society. Furthermore, “living together” is conditioned by the requirements of good governance, whereas at the level of public authorities, it is seen more as a political option.
References
[1]
Nkoyok, J. (2019) Living Together and the Dynamics of the Social Link in Cameroon Which Cameroon Do We Want for Our Children? Edition Cheick AntaDiop, Collection Politique Africaine en Mutation, Douala, 524 p.
[2]
Mbarga, D. (2020) Le challenge du vivre ensemble dans un contexte pluriethnique: le cas du Cameroun. Revue Française de Science Politique, Sciences Po University Press, Paris.
[3]
Avodo, J. (2021) The Pre-Construct of Living Together in the Cameroonian Discursive Space. Jeynitaare: Pan-African Journal of Linguistics for Development, 1.
https://doi.org/10.46711/jeynitaare.2021.1.1.1
[4]
Kameni Wendeu, A.C. (2021) Media Discourse and Its Impact on the Construction of the Living Together in Cameroon. A Panoramic Look at Two Daily Newspapers: “Cameroon Tribune” and “Le Messager”. Jeynitaare: Revue Panafricaine de Linguistique pour le Développement, 1.
https://doi.org/10.46711/jeynitaare.2021.1.1.3
[5]
Balandier, G. (1989) Le Lien Social en Question. Cahiers internationaux de Sociologie, LXXXVI, 5-13.
[6]
Burger, M. (1994) Identity Construction in Verbal Interaction: Aspects of Enunciative Identity Success. Cahiers de Linguistique Française, Words and Discourses: Contrastive Studies and Perspectives, No. 34, 101-122.
[7]
Amossy, R. (2014) Apologie de la polémique. PUF, Coll. L’interrogation Philosophique, Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, Paris, 240.
https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.amos.2014.01
[8]
Doury, M. and Moirand, S. (2005) Argumentation Today. Theoretical Positions in Confrontation, Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, 200 p.
[9]
Plantin, C. (1996) Le trilogue argumentatif. Présentation de modèle, analyse de cas. Langue Française, 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1996.5358
[10]
Fortin, G. (2006) Une dérive néo-sophistique? Les pratiques argumentatives dans les débats politiques télévisés. Communication et Langages, 148, 53-67.
https://doi.org/10.3406/colan.2006.4596
[11]
Adam, J.-M. (1992) Les Textes Types et Prototypes. Récit, Description, Argumentation, Explication et Dialogue. Université/Seuil, Paris, 240.
[12]
Bourdieu, P. (1996) Sur la télévision. Suivi de l’emprise du journalism. Raisons d’agir, Paris, 96.
[13]
Ducrot, O. (1991) Dire et ne pas dire, Paris, Hermann. 3ème Édition, Corrigée et Augmentée, 210.
[14]
Ghiglione, R. and Matalon, B. (1988) Sociological Surveys: Theory and Practice. Armand Colin, Paris, 288.
[15]
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1986) L’implicite. A. Colin, Paris, 404 p.
[16]
Maingueneau, D. (1998) Analysing of Communication Texts. Dunod, Paris, 280 p.
[17]
Véron, E. (1983) Il est là, je le vois, il me parle. Communications, 38, 98-120.
https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1983.1570
[18]
Matsanga Nziengui, M. (2018) The Production and Dissemination of Culture in African Public Television Channels. The Gabonese Experience, Université Grenoble Alpes, Saint Martin d’Hères, 486 p.
[19]
Nel, N. (1990) Le débat televise. Armand Colin, Paris 271 p.
[20]
Rouquette, S. (2003) Vie et mort des débats télévisés 1958 2000. Communication, 22, 250-252. http://journals.openedition.org/communication/4573
[21]
Nga Ndongo, V. (2020) Débats ou combats télévisés? Esquisse de socioanalyse du jeu médiatico-politique au Cameroun. L’Harmattan, Yaoundé, 92 p.
[22]
Charaudeau, P. and Ghiglione, R. (1997) La parole confisquée. Un Genre Télévisuel: Le Talkshow, Dunod, Paris, 296 p.
[23]
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2003) Learning to Live Together: Have We Failed? UNESCO International Bureau of Education, 168 p.
[24]
Fall, K. (2015) De quoi l’expression “le vivre-ensemble” est-il le nom? Cartographie d’une notion’. In: Saillant F., Ed., Pluralité et Vivre Ensemble, Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec, 21-36.
[25]
Broquet, H. (2007) Les nouveaux défis du “vivre ensemble”: Citoyennetés, cultures et démocratie. Charles Roi, Bruxelles, 126 p.
[26]
Touraine, A. (2020) Pourrons-nous vivre ensemble? Fayard, Paris, p. 396.
[27]
Larousse (2018) Dictionnaire Larousse poche. Anniversaire Bicentenaire Pierre Larousse, Paris, 1067 p.
[28]
Constitution du Cameroun (1996) Loi n°96/06 du 18 janvier 1996 portant révision de la Constitution du 02 juin 1972, modifiée et complétée par la loi n°2008/001 du 14 avril 2008, Yaoundé.
[29]
Chabrol, C. and Guérif, F. (2004) Comment Faire un Film? Payot et Rivages, Paris, 98 p.
[30]
Dze Ngwa, W. (1998) The Anglophone Problem in Cameroon: A Historical Perspective, 1916-1995. Maîtrise en Histoire thesis, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, 520 p.
[31]
Nkoum-Me-Ntseny, L.-M. (1996) Dynamique de positionnement anglophone et libéralisation politique au Cameroun: de l’identité à l’identification. Polis/Revue camerounaise de science politique, 1, 68-100.
[32]
Abwa, D. (2000) Le problème anglophone au Cameroun: Facteur d’intégration ou de désintégration nationale? In: Dubois, C., Ed., Frontières plurielles, frontières conflictuelles en Afrique subsaharienne, L’Harmattan, Paris, 115-141.
[33]
Obama, E. (2018) Club d’élites du 03 Juin 2018.
[34]
Owona Nguini, M. (2018) Club d’élites du 10 Juin 2018.
[35]
Matomba, S.-E. (2018) Scène de Presse du 17 Juin 2018.
[36]
Tjomb Yamb, T.C. (2019) Cameroon, Tribalism in Religion Is a Reproduction of the Political Field. Interview with Claude Abé. Yaoundé, Cameroon Tribune.
[37]
Momo, J.-De-D. (2018) Club d’élites du 4 Février 2018.
[38]
Djamen, C. (2019) Droit de Réponse, mars 2019.
[39]
Abolo Mbita, C. (2020) Médias, politique et opinion publique: Les logiques d’influence. Afrédit, Yaoundé, 170p.
[40]
Essomba, E. (2018) Club d’Elites Program, émission du 4 Février 2018.
