All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Education, Science and Governance for Sustainable Development: Change of Paradigms

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1106124, PP. 1-13

Keywords: Abstract Thinking, Scientific Method, IPCC Pseudoscience, Global Warming, Food Security, Sociopaths in Governance, Hunger Apocalypse

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


The main challenges to the sustainable development of humanity were identified and ways to win those challenges proposed, by changing the key concepts in education, science and governance. We conclude that urgent measures should be implemented to avoid the impending catastrophe.


[1]  Khmelinskii, I., Fonseca, C. and Stallinga, P. (2017) Education Today: 12 5 < 4—Lessons of Educational Reforms in Portugal and Beyond. Proceedings of the II International Congress on Interdisciplinarity in Social and Human Sciences, Faro, 11-12 May 2017, 798-805.
[2]  IPCC (2014) IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.
[3]  IPCC (1992) Climate Change, 1990 and 1992 Assessments.
[4]  Laframboise, D. (2011) The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for the World’s Top Climate Expert. Ivy Avenue Press, Toronto.
[5]  Stallinga, P. and Khmelinskii, I. (2019) Climate. Ossónoba Philosophical Society, and the Papers Posted Therein.
[6]  Khmelinskii, I. and Stallinga, P. (2010) Climate Change Policies for the XXIst Century: Mechanisms, Predictions and Recommendations. International Journal of Energy and Environment, 4, 237-244.
[7]  Souza On?a, D. (2011) “When the Sun Shines, They Slip into the Shade...”: Global Warming Ideology. PhD Thesis, University of S?o Paulo, S?o Paulo. (In Portuguese)
[8]  Krug, T. (2020) Prose Contras TV Show, January 27th, RTP1, Portugal, Quote: “It Took Us 30 Years to Persuade Governments and the Public”. (in Portuguese)
[9]  Miranda, M. (2020) IPCC Contact Point in Portugal. Pros e Contras TV Show, January 27th, RTP1, Portugal, Quote: “It Took 30 Years Till Most of Powers Understand That There Is No Discussion to Do, That Really the Greenhouse Gases Are the Main Phenomenon Causing Climate Change … and It Were Natural Phenomena That Really Convinced People and Governments”. (In Portuguese)
[10]  ALLEA (2017) The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.
[11]  Khmelinskii, I. (2013) In Expert and Government Review Comments on the IPCC WGI AR5 Second Order Draft.
[12]  Soon, W. and Yaskell, S.H. (2003) Year without a Summer. Mercury, 32, 13-14.
[13]  Zielinski, S. (2015) Sixth-Century Misery Tied to Not One, But Two, Volcanic Eruptions.
[14]  Real Agriculture News Team (2019) Dutch Farmers Protest Recommendations That Would Decrease Their Livestock Numbers by 50%.
[15]  Krok, M. (2019) The Mystery of the Disappeared Heat Waves. (In Dutch)
[16]  Heller, T. (2020) Are Government Temperature Graphs Credible?
[17]  Monckton, C. (2009) Caught Green Handed! Cold Facts about the Hot Topic of Global Temperature Change after the Climate Gate Scandal.
[18]  Wallace III, J.P., D’Aleo, J.S. and Idso, C.D. (2017) On the Validity of NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU Global Average Surface Temperature Data & the Validity of EPA’s CO2 Endangerment Finding.
[19]  Stallinga, P. and Khmelinskii, I. (2018) On the Stochastic Analysis of Contemporary Global Temperature Data. SciFed Biotech & Bioengineering Journal, 1, 1.
[20]  Stallinga, P. and Khmelinskii, I. (2016, 2018) Two Projects Submitted to FCT (Portugal), with the Main Objective to Test the IPCC Climate Models, Receiving Negative Expert Evaluation (the Lowest Grade of 1 Point, on the Scale of 1 to 8 Points).
[21]  Zeldin-O’Neill, S. (2019) “It’s a Crisis, Not a Change”: The Six Guardian Language Changes on Climate Matters.
[22]  Lobaczewski, A.M. (2013) Political Ponerology. 2nd Edition, Red Pill Press, Grande Prairie.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal