All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Assessment of Dry Port Efficiency in Africa Using Data Envelopment Analysis

DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2019.92012, PP. 193-203

Keywords: Dry Port, Dry Port Efficiency, Dry Port Evaluation, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Model

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


This work involves the evaluation of dry port competitiveness through analysis of efficiencies for selected dry ports in Africa. Five dry ports were selected and analysis carried out over a period of four years. The dry ports considered were Mojo and Kality in Ethiopia, Mombasa in Kenya, Isaka in Tanzania and Casablanca in Casablanca, Morocco. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was applied for this work. Container throughputs for the various ports under consideration were used as the output variable for the data analysis model, while the number of reach stackers, the number of tractors, the number of forklifts and the size of the dry port were used as the input variables. From the results, the Mombasa dry port was found to be the most efficient with an average score of approximately 1 over the period under consideration. Casablanca was the second efficient dry port with an average score of 0.762, while Isaka was the least efficient with an average score of 0.142. This research is significant since the African countries have embraced the dry port concept, as witnessed in the huge investments in this sector, and would serve to highlight areas that need improvement for the few existing dry port facilities, most of which are undergoing expansion as well as modernization.


[1]  PIDG (2015) PIDG Project Fact Sheet Africa: Niger Dry Port.
[2]  Council, N.S. (2016) Dry Ports.
[3]  Elshaday, W.G. (2016) Assessment of the Performance of Dry Ports in Ethiopia Using SCOR Method. Addis Ababa Institute of Technology, Addis Ababa.
[4]  World Port Source.
[5]  Bentaleb, F., Mouhsene, F., Charif, M. and Alami, S. (2016) Dry Port-Seaport System Development: Application of the Product Life Cycle Theory. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 1, 115-128.
[6]  Farrell, M. (1957) Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Efficiency, 120, 253-281.
[7]  Szczepura, A., Davis, C., Fletcher, J. and Bousoffiane, A. (1992) Applied Data Envelopment Analysis in Healthcare: The Relative Efficiency of NHS General Practices. Warwick Business School Research Bureau, Coventry.
[8]  Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
[9]  Wang, T., Song, D.-W. and Cullinane, K. (2003) Container Port Production Efficiency: A Comparative Study of DEA and FDH Approaches. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, 698-713.
[10]  Martinez, B.E., Diaz, A.R., Navarro, I.M. and Ravelo, M.T. (1999) A Study of the Efficiency of Spanish Port Authorities Using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics, 26, 237-257.
[11]  Tongzon, J. (2001) Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and Other International Ports Using DEA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35, 107-122.
[12]  Itoh, H. (2002) Efficiency Changes at Major Container Ports in Japan: A Window Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 14, 133-152.
[13]  Baros, C. (2003) The Measurement of Efficiency of Portuguese Seaport Authorities with DEA. International Journal of Transport Economics, 30, 335-354.
[14]  Barros, C. and Athanassiou, M. (2004) Efficiency in European Seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 122-140.
[15]  Min, H. and Park, B. (2005) Evaluating the Inter-Temporal Efficiency Trends of International Container Terminals Using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 1, 258-277.
[16]  Cullinane, K. and Wang, T. (2006) The Efficiency of European Container Ports: A Cross-Sectional Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 9, 19-31.
[17]  Judit, O., Steffen, N., Thomas, N. and József, P. (2018) Ranking of Dry Ports in Europe-Benchmarking. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 46, 95-100.
[18]  Hercules, H., Girish, G. and Mukul, J. (2011) Dry Port Efficiency and Container Security. IAME Latin America, Santiago, 26-28 October 2011, 1-16.
[19]  Banker, R., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. (1984) Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
[20]  Tulkens, H. and Van den Eeckhaut, P. (1995) Non-Frontier Measures of Efficiency, Progress and Regress for Time Series Data. International Journal of Production Economics, 33, 83-97.
[21]  Pjevčević, D., Radonjić, A., Hrle, Z. and Čolić, V. (2012) DEA Window Analysis for Measuring Port Efficiencies in Serbia. PROMET-Traffic & Transportation, 24, 63-72.
[22]  Chung, S., Lee, A., Kang, H. and Lai, C. (2008) A DEA Window Analysis on the Product Family Mix Selector for Semi-Conductor Fabricator. Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 379-388.
[23]  George, K.V. (2015) Assessment of Port Efficiency in West Africa Using Data Envelopment Analysis. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5, 208-218.
[24]  Citizen (2013) Isaka Dry Port on Track. The Citizen Newspaper.
[25]  Gerald, W.W. and Jin, Z. (2015) A Comparative Study of Dry Ports in East Africa and China. IISTE, 7-17.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal