|
- 2018
CBCT转化的二维平片与头颅侧位片对上气道二维测量的比较研究
|
Abstract:
摘要 目的: 研究三维CBCT转化的二维侧位片(CCB)和数值化头颅侧位片(LCR)对于上气道相同解剖部位的测量结果是否有差异,并且进行两种测量方法的可靠性分析。方法: 将个别正常牙合志愿者的CCB和LCR分别导入Winceph8.0中进行上气道矢状面的距离测量;同一测试者分别进行3次测量; 采用SPSS24.0统计软件,进行组内相关系数、配对t检验来检验不同测量的可靠性和统计学差异。结果: 个别正常牙合志愿者的CCB和LCR分别对上气道进行测量,测量结果符合正态分布后,用配对t检验发现两组不同测量方法所得的PNS-Ba、PNS-Ad1、H-C3、H-FH有统计学差异;每项测量项目都进行3次测量,发现ICC值均大于0.75,说明两种测量方法可靠性均较高,但CBCT转化的二维平片ICC平均值为0.930,而头颅侧位片的ICC平均值为0.830,说明CBCT转化所得的二维平片可靠性高于头颅侧位片。结论: 个别正常牙合的CCB和LCR在骨性标志点的测量值有统计学差异,而软组织标志点的测量值则没有统计学差异;两种测量方法可靠性均较高,但CCB可重复性高于LCR
| [1] | Stabrun AE, Danielsen K. Precision in cephalometric landmark indentification [J]. Eur J Orthod, 1982,4(3)∶185-196 |
| [2] | Olszewski R, Frison L, Wisniewski M, et al. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography [J]. Clin Oral Investig,2012, 17(1)∶285-292 |
| [3] | Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012,81(2)∶267-271 |
| [4] | Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, et al. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2004,33(2)∶83-86 |
| [5] | Vig PS, Hall DJ . The inadequacy of cephalometric radiographs for airway assessment [J]. Am J Orthod, 1980,77(2)∶230-232 |
| [6] | Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, et al. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2007, 36(5)∶263-269 |
| [7] | Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, et al. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2008,134(6)∶798-802 |
| [8] | Araki K, Maki K, Seki K,et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2004, 33(1)∶51-59 |
| [9] | Angelopoulos C. Cone beam tomographic imaging anatomy of the maxillofacial region [J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2008, 52(4)∶731-752 |
| [10] | Ogawa T, Enciso R, Shintaku WH, et al. Evaluation of cross-section airway configuration of obstructive sleep apnea [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2007, 103(1)∶102-108 |
| [11] | Abramson Z, Susarla S, Troulis M, et al. Age-related changes of the upper airway assessed by 3-dimensional computed tomography [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2009,20 Suppl 1∶657-663 |
| [12] | Noffke CE, Farman AG, Nel S, et al. Guidelines for the safe use of dental and maxillofacial CBCT: a review with recommendations for South Africa [J]. SADJ, 2011,66(6)∶262,264-266 |
| [13] | Lenza MG, Lenza MM, Dalstra M, et al. An analysis of different approaches to the assessment of upper airway morphology: a CBCT study [J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2010,13(2)∶96-105 |
| [14] | Schwab RJ. Upper airway imaging [J]. Clin Chest Med, 1998,19(1)∶33-54 |
| [15] | Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, et al. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014,56(29)∶55-77 |
