All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Psychology  2019 

The Effects of Mating Cues and Intrasexual Competition on Humor Production

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2019.103023, PP. 320-335

Keywords: Sex Differences, Sexual Selection, Humor Production, Intrasexual Competition, Priming, Mating Cues

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The roles of mating cues and of intrasexual competition in humor production have not yet been assessed. Therefore, the present study explored the influence of implicit mating cues on humor enhancement. In two experiments involving 306 participants, using a priming methodology to examine sex differences and enhancement in humor production ability, participants were exposed to unattractive and attractive opposite-sex photographs, after which their humor production ability was rated. Studies differed in presentation durations of primes, and manipulation of intrasexual competition. The findings of Study 2 showed that, under conditions of intrasexual competition, men were superior to women in humor production ability and exhibited enhancement in humor ability following exposure to attractive women primes. The findings broaden the evolutionary cognitive framework in relation to sexual selection, differential parental investment, and social cognition.

References

[1]  Alexander, R. D. (1986). Ostracism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Reproductive Significance of Humor. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7, 253-270.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(86)90052-X
[2]  Arden, R., Gottfredson, L. S., & Miller, G. (2009). Does a Fitness Factor Contribute to the Association between Intelligence and Health Outcomes? Evidence from Medical Abnormality Counts among 3654 US Veterans. Intelligence, 37, 581-591.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.03.008
[3]  Baker, M., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-Taking as a Situationally Sensitive Male Mating Strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391-395.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.06.001
[4]  Bressler, E. R., & Balshine, S. (2006). The Influence of Humor on Desirability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.002
[5]  Bressler, E. R., Martin, R. A., & Balshine, S. (2006). Production and Appreciation of Humor as Sexually Selected Traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 121-130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.09.001
[6]  Brewer, G. (2017). Single and Partnered Women: Competing to Obtain and Retain High-Quality Men. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and Competition (pp. 301-317). New York: Oxford University Press.
[7]  Buss, D. M. (1988). The Evolution of Human Intrasexual Competition: Tactics of Mate Attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616-628.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.616
[8]  Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992
[9]  Buss, D. M. (2003). The Evolution of Desire (Revision ed.). New York: Basic Books.
[10]  Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of Competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 395-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590073006
[11]  Campbell, A. (2013). A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Women (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609543.001.0001
[12]  Chang, Y-T., Ku, L-C., & Chen, H-C. (2018). Sex Differences in Humor Processing: An Event-Related Potential Study. Brain and Cognition, 120, 34-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2017.11.002
[13]  Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Vincent, A. C. J. (1991). Sexual Selection and the Potential Reproductive Rates of Males and Females. Nature, 351, 58-60.
https://doi.org/10.1038/351058a0
[14]  Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.
[15]  Dawkins, R. (2004). The Ancestor’s Tale. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
[16]  De Waal, F. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. New York: Harper and Row.
[17]  Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1991). Psychometric Intelligence and Verbal Humor Ability. Personality & Individual Differences, 12, 427-435.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90060-O
[18]  Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1993). Preliminary Validation of a Multidimensional Model of Wittiness. Journal of Personality, 61, 439-456.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00288.x
[19]  Fisher, M. L., & Fernández, A. M. (2017). The Influence of Women’s Mate Value on Intrasexual Competition. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and Competition (pp. 281-299). New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.52
[20]  Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and Proximate Expression of Human Paternal Investment. Psychological Review, 126, 55-77.
[21]  Greengross, G., & Miller, G. (2011). Humor Ability Reveals Intelligence, Predicts Mating Success, and Is Higher in Males. Intelligence, 39, 188-192.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.006
[22]  Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and Parental Investment: The Effects of Romantic Motives on Creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.63
[23]  Hill, A. K., Bailey, D. H., & Puts, D. A. (2017). Gorillas in Our Midst? Human Sexual Dimorphism and Contest Competition in Men. In M. Tibayrenc, & F. J. Ayala (Eds.), On Human Nature: Biology, Psychology, Ethics, Politics, and Religion (pp. 235-249). New York: Academic Press.
[24]  Hone, L. S. E., Hurwitz, W., & Lieberman, D. (2015). Sex Differences in Preferences for Humor: A Replication, Modification, and Extension. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300110
[25]  Howrigan, D. P., & MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Humor as a Mental Fitness Indicator. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 652-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600411
[26]  Jung, W. E. (2003). The Inner Eye Theory of Laughter: Mindreader Signals Cooperator Value. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 214-253.
https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490300100118
[27]  Kanazawa, S. (2000). Scientific Discoveries as Cultural Displays: A Further Test of Miller’s Courtship Model. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 317-321.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00051-9
[28]  Kordsmeyer, T. L., Hunt, J., Puts, D. A., Ostner, J., & Penke, L. (2018). The Relative Importance of Intra- and Intersexual Selection on Human Male Sexually Dimorphic Traits. Evolution & Human Behavior, 1-13.
[29]  Lundy, D. E., Tan, J., & Cunningham, M. R. (1998). Heterosexual Romantic Preferences: The Importance of Humor and Physical Attractiveness for Different Types of Relationships. Personal Relationships, 5, 311-325.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00174.x
[30]  Martin, R. A. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrated Approach. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press.
[31]  Massar, K., & Buunk, A. P. (2010). Judging a Book by Its Cover: Jealousy after Subliminal Priming with Attractive and Unattractive Faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 634-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.037
[32]  Masten, A. S. (1986). Humor and Competence in School-Aged Children. Child Development, 57, 461-473.
[33]  Millar, M. G., & Ostlund, N. M. (2006). The Effects of a Parenting Prime on Sex Differences in Mate Selection Criteria. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1459-1468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291340
[34]  Miller, G. F. (1999). Sexual Selection for Cultural Displays. In R. Dunbar, C. Knight, & C. Power (Eds.), The Evolution of Culture: An Interdisciplinary View (pp. 71-91). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
[35]  Miller, G. F. (2000). Sexual Selection for Indicators of Intelligence. In G. Bock, J. Goode, & K. Webb (Eds.), The Nature of Intelligence (pp. 260-275). Novartis Foundation Symposium 233. Chichester: Wiley.
[36]  Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic Fitness: How Sexual Selection Shaped Artistic Virtuosity as a Fitness Indicator and Aesthetic Preferences as Mate Choice Criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2, 20-25.
[37]  Morier, D., & Seroy, C. (1994). The Effect of Interpersonal Expectancies on Men’s Self-Presentation of Gender Role Attitudes to Women. Sex Roles, 31, 493-504.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544203
[38]  Phaf, R. H., Wendte, R., & Rotteveel, M. (2005). Privileged Processing of Low Spatial Frequencies in Emotional Faces? In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1744-1749). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
[39]  Polimeni, J., & Reiss, J. P. (2006). The First Joke: Exploring the Evolutionary Origins of Humor. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 347-366.
https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490600400129
[40]  Reay, M. (2015). Using “Wild” Laughter to Explore the Social Sources of Humor. Social Forces, 93, 1241-1265. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou106
[41]  Roney, J. R. (2003). Effects of Visual Exposure to the Opposite Sex: Cognitive Aspects of Mate Attraction in Human Males. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250221
[42]  Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal Dimensions of Human Mate Preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447-458.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023
[43]  Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine.
[44]  Walters, S., & Crawford, C. B. (1994). The Importance of Mate Attraction for Intrasexual Competition in Men and Women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 5-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90025-6
[45]  Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do Pretty Women Inspire Men to Discount the Future? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 271, S177-S179.
[46]  Yong, J. C., & Li, N. P. (2012). Cash in Hand, Want Better Looking Mate: Significant Resource Cues Raise Men’s Mating Standards. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.018
[47]  Zanna, M. P., & Pack, S. J. (1975). On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Apparent Sex Differences in Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 583-591.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90009-8

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus