The roles of mating cues and of intrasexual competition in humor production have not yet been assessed. Therefore, the present study explored the influence of implicit mating cues on humor enhancement. In two experiments involving 306 participants, using a priming methodology to examine sex differences and enhancement in humor production ability, participants were exposed to unattractive and attractive opposite-sex photographs, after which their humor production ability was rated. Studies differed in presentation durations of primes, and manipulation of intrasexual competition. The findings of Study 2 showed that, under conditions of intrasexual competition, men were superior to women in humor production ability and exhibited enhancement in humor ability following exposure to attractive women primes. The findings broaden the evolutionary cognitive framework in relation to sexual selection, differential parental investment, and social cognition.
Arden, R., Gottfredson, L. S., & Miller, G. (2009). Does a Fitness Factor Contribute to the Association between Intelligence and Health Outcomes? Evidence from Medical Abnormality Counts among 3654 US Veterans. Intelligence, 37, 581-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.03.008
Bressler, E. R., Martin, R. A., & Balshine, S. (2006). Production and Appreciation of Humor as Sexually Selected Traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.09.001
Brewer, G. (2017). Single and Partnered Women: Competing to Obtain and Retain High-Quality Men. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and Competition (pp. 301-317). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, M. L., & Fernández, A. M. (2017). The Influence of Women’s Mate Value on Intrasexual Competition. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and Competition (pp. 281-299). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.52
Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and Parental Investment: The Effects of Romantic Motives on Creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124
Hill, A. K., Bailey, D. H., & Puts, D. A. (2017). Gorillas in Our Midst? Human Sexual Dimorphism and Contest Competition in Men. In M. Tibayrenc, & F. J. Ayala (Eds.), On Human Nature: Biology, Psychology, Ethics, Politics, and Religion (pp. 235-249). New York: Academic Press.
Hone, L. S. E., Hurwitz, W., & Lieberman, D. (2015). Sex Differences in Preferences for Humor: A Replication, Modification, and Extension. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300110
Kordsmeyer, T. L., Hunt, J., Puts, D. A., Ostner, J., & Penke, L. (2018). The Relative Importance of Intra- and Intersexual Selection on Human Male Sexually Dimorphic Traits. Evolution & Human Behavior, 1-13.
Lundy, D. E., Tan, J., & Cunningham, M. R. (1998). Heterosexual Romantic Preferences: The Importance of Humor and Physical Attractiveness for Different Types of Relationships. Personal Relationships, 5, 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00174.x
Massar, K., & Buunk, A. P. (2010). Judging a Book by Its Cover: Jealousy after Subliminal Priming with Attractive and Unattractive Faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 634-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.037
Millar, M. G., & Ostlund, N. M. (2006). The Effects of a Parenting Prime on Sex Differences in Mate Selection Criteria. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1459-1468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291340
Miller, G. F. (1999). Sexual Selection for Cultural Displays. In R. Dunbar, C. Knight, & C. Power (Eds.), The Evolution of Culture: An Interdisciplinary View (pp. 71-91). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Miller, G. F. (2000). Sexual Selection for Indicators of Intelligence. In G. Bock, J. Goode, & K. Webb (Eds.), The Nature of Intelligence (pp. 260-275). Novartis Foundation Symposium 233. Chichester: Wiley.
Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic Fitness: How Sexual Selection Shaped Artistic Virtuosity as a Fitness Indicator and Aesthetic Preferences as Mate Choice Criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2, 20-25.
Phaf, R. H., Wendte, R., & Rotteveel, M. (2005). Privileged Processing of Low Spatial Frequencies in Emotional Faces? In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1744-1749). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Roney, J. R. (2003). Effects of Visual Exposure to the Opposite Sex: Cognitive Aspects of Mate Attraction in Human Males. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250221
Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal Dimensions of Human Mate Preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023
Zanna, M. P., & Pack, S. J. (1975). On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Apparent Sex Differences in Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 583-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90009-8